Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel
{"title":"氯虫腈对天然和人工土壤中念珠菌和隐翅虫的毒性研究。","authors":"Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity of Chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus in natural and artificial soil.\",\"authors\":\"Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toxicity of Chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus in natural and artificial soil.
Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.