氯虫腈对天然和人工土壤中念珠菌和隐翅虫的毒性研究。

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel
{"title":"氯虫腈对天然和人工土壤中念珠菌和隐翅虫的毒性研究。","authors":"Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity of Chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus in natural and artificial soil.\",\"authors\":\"Sam van Loon, Bart G van Hall, Sven Janse, Cornelis A M van Gestel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要具有不同作用方式的农药来对付具有多种农药抗性的害虫。一种建议的替代方法是吡咯类杀虫剂氯虫腈。这种亲农药需要CYP450酶的生物活化才能形成更有效的代谢物曲洛吡里尔。然而,它对非目标土壤生物的影响在很大程度上是未知的。本研究旨在根据经济合作与发展组织(OECD)土壤生态毒理学指南,评价虫螨腈对土壤生态毒理学模式物种念珠菌(Folsomia candida)和隐翅虫(Enchytraeus crypticus)的毒性。试验在Lufa 2.2天然土壤和含5%泥炭的OECD人工土壤(OECD5)中进行。假丝酵母菌暴露28 d,隐隐假丝酵母菌暴露21 d。氯虫腈对念珠菌的毒性较高,Lufa 2.2和OECD5土壤lc10分别为1.88和0.64 mg/kg干土,lc50分别为2.44和1.01 mg/kg干土。在Lufa 2.2和OECD5土壤中,ec10分别为0.36和0.25 mg/kg, ec50分别为0.79和0.35 mg/kg。在试验浓度范围内(即无观察效应浓度(NOEC)为0 ~ 900 mg/kg干土),虫螨腈对隐夜蛾无毒性,表明对田间斑蝽无直接危害。观察到的对念珠菌的影响浓度在氯虫腈农业使用的预期环境浓度范围内,因此表明对线虫具有直接危害。两种试验土壤和两种试验物种的毒性差异表明,使用不同的土壤和不同的试验生物进行农药环境风险评价的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toxicity of Chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus in natural and artificial soil.

Pesticides with vastly different modes of action are needed to combat pests that have become multi-pesticide resistant. One proposed alternative is the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr. This pro-pesticide needs bioactivation by CYP450 enzymes to form the more potent metabolite tralopyril. However, its effects on non-target soil organisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the toxicity of chlorfenapyr to Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus, two model species for soil ecotoxicology, following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. Tests were performed in Lufa 2.2 natural soil and in OECD artificial soil containing 5% sphagnum peat (OECD5). F. candida were exposed for 28 days, E. crypticus for 21 days. High toxicity of chlorfenapyr was observed to F. candida, with LC10s of 1.88 and 0.64 mg/kg dry soil, and LC50s of 2.44 and 1.01 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. For reproduction, EC10s were 0.36 and 0.25 mg/kg dry soil, and EC50s 0.79 and 0.35 mg/kg dry soil in Lufa 2.2 and OECD5 soils, respectively. Chlorfenapyr was not toxic to E. crypticus within the tested concentration range (ie No-Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) >900 mg/kg dry soil), indicating no immediate hazard to enchytraeids in the field. The observed effect concentrations for F. candida are within the predicted environmental concentrations for agricultural use of chlorfenapyr and therefore indicate an immediate hazard towards Collembola. The differences in toxicity observed between the two test soils and the two test species show the importance of using different soils and different test organisms in the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信