采用专门降噪的新型LED内镜系统改善结肠镜图像质量。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Naohisa Yoshida, Masahiro Okada, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshito Itoh, Ryohei Hirose, Lucas Cardoso, Kohei Suzuki, Tomonori Yano, Hironori Yamamoto
{"title":"采用专门降噪的新型LED内镜系统改善结肠镜图像质量。","authors":"Naohisa Yoshida, Masahiro Okada, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshito Itoh, Ryohei Hirose, Lucas Cardoso, Kohei Suzuki, Tomonori Yano, Hironori Yamamoto","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> A new LED endoscopy system featuring advanced noise-reduction technology, the EP-8000 with the EC-860ZP colonoscope (Fujifilm), was introduced in 2024. We evaluated the improvements in colonoscopic image quality of this system, comparing it with a previous system/scope (VP-7000/EC-760ZP). <b>Methods:</b> This is a multicenter, observational study. From January 2024 to February 2025, 150 patients undergoing colonoscopy at two institutions were enrolled. Images of the cecum and lesions were captured using white light imaging (WLI), blue light imaging (BLI), and linked color imaging (LCI) under similar conditions. Participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 (EP-8000+EC-860ZP; 50 cases), Group 2 (EP-8000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases), and Group 3 (VP-7000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases). Cecal and lesion images were evaluated for brightness, halation, and visibility using a four-point scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) by endoscopists and original values by image-analysis software. <b>Results:</b> In cecal images, the endoscopists' scores in Group 1 were significantly better than in Group 3 for brightness (WLI: 3.71 ± 0.55 vs. 3.51 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001, BLI: 3.15 ± 0.85 vs. 2.23 ± 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001; LCI: 3.83 ± 0.42 vs. 3.54 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and for halation (WLI: 3.60 ± 0.51 vs. 3.18 ± 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001, BLI: 2.99 ± 0.69 vs. 2.71 ± 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001; LCI: 3.33 ± 0.60 vs. 3.10 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Software analysis confirmed that Group 1 had superior brightness values compared with Group 3 for WLI, BLI, and LCI, as well as lower halation values for WLI and LCI. Regarding lesion images, brightness, halation, and visibility for WLI, BLI, and LCI were superior in Group 1 than in Group 3. <b>Conclusions:</b> The new LED system provided improvements in brightness, halation, and lesion visibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Colonoscopic Image Quality Using a New LED Endoscopic System with Specialized Noise Reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Naohisa Yoshida, Masahiro Okada, Yoshikazu Hayashi, Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yoshito Itoh, Ryohei Hirose, Lucas Cardoso, Kohei Suzuki, Tomonori Yano, Hironori Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> A new LED endoscopy system featuring advanced noise-reduction technology, the EP-8000 with the EC-860ZP colonoscope (Fujifilm), was introduced in 2024. We evaluated the improvements in colonoscopic image quality of this system, comparing it with a previous system/scope (VP-7000/EC-760ZP). <b>Methods:</b> This is a multicenter, observational study. From January 2024 to February 2025, 150 patients undergoing colonoscopy at two institutions were enrolled. Images of the cecum and lesions were captured using white light imaging (WLI), blue light imaging (BLI), and linked color imaging (LCI) under similar conditions. Participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 (EP-8000+EC-860ZP; 50 cases), Group 2 (EP-8000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases), and Group 3 (VP-7000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases). Cecal and lesion images were evaluated for brightness, halation, and visibility using a four-point scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) by endoscopists and original values by image-analysis software. <b>Results:</b> In cecal images, the endoscopists' scores in Group 1 were significantly better than in Group 3 for brightness (WLI: 3.71 ± 0.55 vs. 3.51 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001, BLI: 3.15 ± 0.85 vs. 2.23 ± 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001; LCI: 3.83 ± 0.42 vs. 3.54 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and for halation (WLI: 3.60 ± 0.51 vs. 3.18 ± 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001, BLI: 2.99 ± 0.69 vs. 2.71 ± 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001; LCI: 3.33 ± 0.60 vs. 3.10 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Software analysis confirmed that Group 1 had superior brightness values compared with Group 3 for WLI, BLI, and LCI, as well as lower halation values for WLI and LCI. Regarding lesion images, brightness, halation, and visibility for WLI, BLI, and LCI were superior in Group 1 than in Group 3. <b>Conclusions:</b> The new LED system provided improvements in brightness, halation, and lesion visibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121569\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:采用先进降噪技术的新型LED内窥镜系统EP-8000与EC-860ZP结肠镜(富士胶片)于2024年推出。我们评估了该系统在结肠镜图像质量方面的改进,并将其与以前的系统/范围(VP-7000/EC-760ZP)进行了比较。方法:这是一项多中心观察性研究。从2024年1月到2025年2月,150名患者在两家机构接受结肠镜检查。在相似的条件下,采用白光成像(WLI)、蓝光成像(BLI)和联色成像(LCI)捕获盲肠和病变的图像。参与者分为三组:第一组(EP-8000+EC-860ZP);2组(EP-8000+EC-760ZP;第3组(VP-7000+EC-760ZP;50例)。内镜医师采用4分制(1 =差至4 =优)评估盲肠和病变图像的亮度、光晕和可见度,图像分析软件采用原始值。结果:盲肠图像上,1组内镜医师亮度评分明显优于3组(WLI: 3.71±0.55比3.51±0.58,p < 0.001; BLI: 3.15±0.85比2.23±0.92,p < 0.001;LCI: 3.83±0.42比3.54±0.58,p < 0.001)和halation (WLI: 3.60±0.51比3.18±0.59,p < 0.001, BLI: 2.99±0.69比2.71±0.78,p < 0.001;LCI: 3.33±0.60 vs. 3.10±0.58,p < 0.001)。软件分析证实,与组3相比,组1在WLI、BLI和LCI方面的亮度值更高,而WLI和LCI的光晕值更低。在病变图像方面,组1的WLI、BLI和LCI的亮度、光晕和可见度优于组3。结论:新的LED系统改善了亮度、光晕和病变可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement of Colonoscopic Image Quality Using a New LED Endoscopic System with Specialized Noise Reduction.

Background/Objectives: A new LED endoscopy system featuring advanced noise-reduction technology, the EP-8000 with the EC-860ZP colonoscope (Fujifilm), was introduced in 2024. We evaluated the improvements in colonoscopic image quality of this system, comparing it with a previous system/scope (VP-7000/EC-760ZP). Methods: This is a multicenter, observational study. From January 2024 to February 2025, 150 patients undergoing colonoscopy at two institutions were enrolled. Images of the cecum and lesions were captured using white light imaging (WLI), blue light imaging (BLI), and linked color imaging (LCI) under similar conditions. Participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 (EP-8000+EC-860ZP; 50 cases), Group 2 (EP-8000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases), and Group 3 (VP-7000+EC-760ZP; 50 cases). Cecal and lesion images were evaluated for brightness, halation, and visibility using a four-point scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) by endoscopists and original values by image-analysis software. Results: In cecal images, the endoscopists' scores in Group 1 were significantly better than in Group 3 for brightness (WLI: 3.71 ± 0.55 vs. 3.51 ± 0.58, p < 0.001, BLI: 3.15 ± 0.85 vs. 2.23 ± 0.92, p < 0.001; LCI: 3.83 ± 0.42 vs. 3.54 ± 0.58, p < 0.001) and for halation (WLI: 3.60 ± 0.51 vs. 3.18 ± 0.59, p < 0.001, BLI: 2.99 ± 0.69 vs. 2.71 ± 0.78, p < 0.001; LCI: 3.33 ± 0.60 vs. 3.10 ± 0.58, p < 0.001). Software analysis confirmed that Group 1 had superior brightness values compared with Group 3 for WLI, BLI, and LCI, as well as lower halation values for WLI and LCI. Regarding lesion images, brightness, halation, and visibility for WLI, BLI, and LCI were superior in Group 1 than in Group 3. Conclusions: The new LED system provided improvements in brightness, halation, and lesion visibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信