通过深度学习重建MRI扫描增强海马子场可视化。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nikolaus Clodi, Benjamin Bender, Gretha Hecke, Karolin Hauptvogel, Georg Gohla, Till-Karsten Hauser, Patrick Ghibes, Klaus Hergan, Ulrike Ernemann, Arne Estler
{"title":"通过深度学习重建MRI扫描增强海马子场可视化。","authors":"Nikolaus Clodi, Benjamin Bender, Gretha Hecke, Karolin Hauptvogel, Georg Gohla, Till-Karsten Hauser, Patrick Ghibes, Klaus Hergan, Ulrike Ernemann, Arne Estler","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Assessing hippocampal pathology in epilepsy is challenging, and improving diagnostic accuracy can benefit from deep learning image reconstruction, standardized imaging protocols, and advanced post-processing methods. This study compares T2 TSE DRB (Deep Resolve Boost) sequences with standard T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation and volumetry using FreeSurfer, focusing on how DRB affects image acquisition time without compromising diagnostic accuracy. <b>Methods:</b> FreeSurfer (version 7.4.1) was used to segment hippocampal subregions in 36 subjects (mean age of 39 ± 14 years; 21 males, 15 females) using both T2 TSE DRB and T2 TSE sequences. The segmented volumes were compared with a two-tailed <i>t</i>-test, and pathological volume differences were assessed using z-values based on a 95% confidence interval (-2 < z < 2). <b>Results:</b> Overall hippocampal segment volumes were identical between sequences. However, significant volume differences were noted in the CA1-Body (<i>p</i> = 0.003), CA4-Body (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and whole hippocampal body (<i>p</i> = 0.012) in the right hippocampus. Despite these differences, the low effect sizes suggest DRB sequences are comparable to conventional sequences. Additionally, DRB reduced image acquisition time by 61%. Z-scores identified pathological volume changes between the left and right hippocampus in individual subjects. <b>Conclusions:</b> T2 TSE DRB sequences are non-inferior to conventional T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation. The DRB method improves efficiency while providing clinically reliable results, and the proposed 95% confidence interval can aid in more objective assessments of hippocampal pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Hippocampal Subfield Visualization Through Deep Learning Reconstructed MRI Scans.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Clodi, Benjamin Bender, Gretha Hecke, Karolin Hauptvogel, Georg Gohla, Till-Karsten Hauser, Patrick Ghibes, Klaus Hergan, Ulrike Ernemann, Arne Estler\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Assessing hippocampal pathology in epilepsy is challenging, and improving diagnostic accuracy can benefit from deep learning image reconstruction, standardized imaging protocols, and advanced post-processing methods. This study compares T2 TSE DRB (Deep Resolve Boost) sequences with standard T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation and volumetry using FreeSurfer, focusing on how DRB affects image acquisition time without compromising diagnostic accuracy. <b>Methods:</b> FreeSurfer (version 7.4.1) was used to segment hippocampal subregions in 36 subjects (mean age of 39 ± 14 years; 21 males, 15 females) using both T2 TSE DRB and T2 TSE sequences. The segmented volumes were compared with a two-tailed <i>t</i>-test, and pathological volume differences were assessed using z-values based on a 95% confidence interval (-2 < z < 2). <b>Results:</b> Overall hippocampal segment volumes were identical between sequences. However, significant volume differences were noted in the CA1-Body (<i>p</i> = 0.003), CA4-Body (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and whole hippocampal body (<i>p</i> = 0.012) in the right hippocampus. Despite these differences, the low effect sizes suggest DRB sequences are comparable to conventional sequences. Additionally, DRB reduced image acquisition time by 61%. Z-scores identified pathological volume changes between the left and right hippocampus in individual subjects. <b>Conclusions:</b> T2 TSE DRB sequences are non-inferior to conventional T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation. The DRB method improves efficiency while providing clinically reliable results, and the proposed 95% confidence interval can aid in more objective assessments of hippocampal pathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:评估癫痫的海马病理是具有挑战性的,提高诊断准确性可以受益于深度学习图像重建、标准化成像方案和先进的后处理方法。本研究比较了T2 TSE DRB (Deep Resolve Boost)序列与使用FreeSurfer进行海马分割和体积测定的标准T2 TSE序列,重点研究了DRB如何在不影响诊断准确性的情况下影响图像采集时间。方法:使用FreeSurfer (version 7.4.1)软件对36例(平均年龄39±14岁;21名男性,15名女性)同时使用T2 TSE DRB和T2 TSE序列。采用双尾t检验对分割的体积进行比较,并使用基于95%置信区间(-2 < z < 2)的z值评估病理体积差异。结果:两个序列的海马节段总体体积相同。而右侧海马CA1-Body (p = 0.003)、CA4-Body (p = 0.002)和整个海马体(p = 0.012)的体积差异有统计学意义。尽管存在这些差异,但低效应量表明DRB序列与常规序列相当。此外,DRB将图像采集时间减少了61%。z分数显示了个体受试者左右海马体之间的病理性体积变化。结论:T2 TSE DRB序列对海马分割的效果不逊于常规T2 TSE序列。DRB方法在提供临床可靠结果的同时提高了效率,提出的95%置信区间有助于更客观地评估海马病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Hippocampal Subfield Visualization Through Deep Learning Reconstructed MRI Scans.

Background/Objectives: Assessing hippocampal pathology in epilepsy is challenging, and improving diagnostic accuracy can benefit from deep learning image reconstruction, standardized imaging protocols, and advanced post-processing methods. This study compares T2 TSE DRB (Deep Resolve Boost) sequences with standard T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation and volumetry using FreeSurfer, focusing on how DRB affects image acquisition time without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Methods: FreeSurfer (version 7.4.1) was used to segment hippocampal subregions in 36 subjects (mean age of 39 ± 14 years; 21 males, 15 females) using both T2 TSE DRB and T2 TSE sequences. The segmented volumes were compared with a two-tailed t-test, and pathological volume differences were assessed using z-values based on a 95% confidence interval (-2 < z < 2). Results: Overall hippocampal segment volumes were identical between sequences. However, significant volume differences were noted in the CA1-Body (p = 0.003), CA4-Body (p = 0.002), and whole hippocampal body (p = 0.012) in the right hippocampus. Despite these differences, the low effect sizes suggest DRB sequences are comparable to conventional sequences. Additionally, DRB reduced image acquisition time by 61%. Z-scores identified pathological volume changes between the left and right hippocampus in individual subjects. Conclusions: T2 TSE DRB sequences are non-inferior to conventional T2 TSE sequences for hippocampal segmentation. The DRB method improves efficiency while providing clinically reliable results, and the proposed 95% confidence interval can aid in more objective assessments of hippocampal pathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信