商用人工智能软件在胸腹CT扫描中检测偶发椎体压缩性骨折的临床验证

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Vinu Mathew, Dawn Pearce, Noah Kates Rose, Sidharth Saini, Earl Bogoch
{"title":"商用人工智能软件在胸腹CT扫描中检测偶发椎体压缩性骨折的临床验证","authors":"Vinu Mathew, Dawn Pearce, Noah Kates Rose, Sidharth Saini, Earl Bogoch","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The objective of this study was to clinically validate the performance of the Nanox.AI HealthOST software in detecting incidental vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on outpatient chest and abdomen CT scans using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A secondary aim was to assess the rate of missed VCFs using initial radiologist reports. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was performed on 590 outpatient CT scans. HealthOST, an artificial intelligence solution from Nanox.AI that allows for automated spine analysis using CT images was evaluated against a consensus ground truth established by two radiologists, including a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. Two vertebral body height reduction thresholds were tested: mild (>20%) and moderate (>25%). Original radiologist reports were reviewed to identify missed VCFs. <b>Results:</b> At the 20% threshold, the AI achieved a sensitivity of 92.0%, a specificity of 52.7%, a PPV of 16.5%, and an NPV of 98.5%. At the 25% threshold, sensitivity decreased to 78.0%, while specificity improved to 94.2%, with a PPV of 51.1% and an NPV of 98.2%. The AI identified 88% and 92% of fractures missed by radiologists at the 20% and 25% thresholds, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Nanox HealthOST AI solution demonstrates potential as an effective screening tool, with threshold selection adaptable to clinical needs with a secondary review by a radiologist that is advisable to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The study further indicates that radiologists often overlook VCFs in reporting non-indicated cases and that AI has a role in enhancing the detection and reporting of vertebral compression fractures in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Validation of Commercial AI Software for the Detection of Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans of the Chest and Abdomen.\",\"authors\":\"Vinu Mathew, Dawn Pearce, Noah Kates Rose, Sidharth Saini, Earl Bogoch\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The objective of this study was to clinically validate the performance of the Nanox.AI HealthOST software in detecting incidental vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on outpatient chest and abdomen CT scans using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A secondary aim was to assess the rate of missed VCFs using initial radiologist reports. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was performed on 590 outpatient CT scans. HealthOST, an artificial intelligence solution from Nanox.AI that allows for automated spine analysis using CT images was evaluated against a consensus ground truth established by two radiologists, including a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. Two vertebral body height reduction thresholds were tested: mild (>20%) and moderate (>25%). Original radiologist reports were reviewed to identify missed VCFs. <b>Results:</b> At the 20% threshold, the AI achieved a sensitivity of 92.0%, a specificity of 52.7%, a PPV of 16.5%, and an NPV of 98.5%. At the 25% threshold, sensitivity decreased to 78.0%, while specificity improved to 94.2%, with a PPV of 51.1% and an NPV of 98.2%. The AI identified 88% and 92% of fractures missed by radiologists at the 20% and 25% thresholds, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Nanox HealthOST AI solution demonstrates potential as an effective screening tool, with threshold selection adaptable to clinical needs with a secondary review by a radiologist that is advisable to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The study further indicates that radiologists often overlook VCFs in reporting non-indicated cases and that AI has a role in enhancing the detection and reporting of vertebral compression fractures in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究的目的是临床验证Nanox的性能。AI healththost软件在门诊胸部和腹部CT扫描中检测偶发性椎体压缩性骨折(vcf)的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。第二个目的是利用放射科医生的初步报告来评估VCFs的漏诊率。方法:对590例门诊CT扫描资料进行回顾性分析。Nanox的人工智能解决方案healththost。人工智能允许使用CT图像进行自动脊柱分析,并根据两名放射科医生(包括一名高级肌肉骨骼放射科医生)建立的共识进行评估。测试两种椎体高度降低阈值:轻度(>20%)和中度(>25%)。回顾放射科医生的原始报告,以确定遗漏的vcf。结果:在20%阈值下,人工智能的敏感性为92.0%,特异性为52.7%,PPV为16.5%,NPV为98.5%。在25%阈值下,敏感性降至78.0%,特异性提高至94.2%,PPV为51.1%,NPV为98.2%。在20%和25%的阈值下,人工智能分别识别出88%和92%的放射科医生遗漏的骨折。结论:Nanox healththost人工智能解决方案显示了作为一种有效筛查工具的潜力,其阈值选择可适应临床需要,并由放射科医生进行二次审查,以确保诊断准确性。该研究进一步表明,放射科医生在报告非指征病例时往往会忽略vcf,而人工智能在常规临床实践中对加强椎体压缩性骨折的发现和报告具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Validation of Commercial AI Software for the Detection of Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans of the Chest and Abdomen.

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to clinically validate the performance of the Nanox.AI HealthOST software in detecting incidental vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on outpatient chest and abdomen CT scans using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A secondary aim was to assess the rate of missed VCFs using initial radiologist reports. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 590 outpatient CT scans. HealthOST, an artificial intelligence solution from Nanox.AI that allows for automated spine analysis using CT images was evaluated against a consensus ground truth established by two radiologists, including a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. Two vertebral body height reduction thresholds were tested: mild (>20%) and moderate (>25%). Original radiologist reports were reviewed to identify missed VCFs. Results: At the 20% threshold, the AI achieved a sensitivity of 92.0%, a specificity of 52.7%, a PPV of 16.5%, and an NPV of 98.5%. At the 25% threshold, sensitivity decreased to 78.0%, while specificity improved to 94.2%, with a PPV of 51.1% and an NPV of 98.2%. The AI identified 88% and 92% of fractures missed by radiologists at the 20% and 25% thresholds, respectively. Conclusions: The Nanox HealthOST AI solution demonstrates potential as an effective screening tool, with threshold selection adaptable to clinical needs with a secondary review by a radiologist that is advisable to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The study further indicates that radiologists often overlook VCFs in reporting non-indicated cases and that AI has a role in enhancing the detection and reporting of vertebral compression fractures in routine clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信