通过IVIM-DWI参数和信号衰减分析表征乳腺肿瘤异质性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Si-Wa Chan, Chun-An Lin, Yen-Chieh Ouyang, Guan-Yuan Chen, Chein-I Chang, Chin-Yao Lin, Chih-Chiang Hung, Chih-Yean Lum, Kuo-Chung Wang, Ming-Cheng Liu
{"title":"通过IVIM-DWI参数和信号衰减分析表征乳腺肿瘤异质性。","authors":"Si-Wa Chan, Chun-An Lin, Yen-Chieh Ouyang, Guan-Yuan Chen, Chein-I Chang, Chin-Yao Lin, Chih-Chiang Hung, Chih-Yean Lum, Kuo-Chung Wang, Ming-Cheng Liu","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This research presents a novel analytical method for breast tumor characterization and tissue classification by leveraging intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) combined with hyperspectral imaging techniques and deep learning. Traditionally, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is employed for breast tumor diagnosis, but it involves gadolinium-based contrast agents, which carry potential health risks. IVIM imaging extends conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by explicitly separating the signal decay into components representing true molecular diffusion (D) and microcirculation of capillary blood (pseudo-diffusion or D*). This separation allows for a more comprehensive, non-invasive assessment of tissue characteristics without the need for contrast agents, thereby offering a safer alternative for breast cancer diagnosis. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods for breast tumor characterization using IVIM-DWI data treated as hyperspectral image stacks. Dice similarity coefficients and Jaccard indices were specifically used to evaluate the spatial segmentation accuracy of tumor boundaries, confirmed by experienced physicians on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), emphasizing detailed tumor characterization rather than binary diagnosis of cancer. <b>Methods:</b> The data source for this study consisted of breast MRI scans obtained from 22 patients diagnosed with mass-type breast cancer, resulting in 22 distinct mass tumor cases analyzed. MR images were acquired using a 3T MRI system (Discovery MR750 3.0 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with axial IVIM sequences and a bipolar pulsed gradient spin echo sequence. Multiple b-values ranging from 0 to 2500 s/mm<sup>2</sup> were utilized, specifically thirteen original b-values (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>), with the last four b-value images replicated once for a total of 17 bands used in the analysis. The methodology involved several steps: acquisition of multi-b-value IVIM-DWI images, image pre-processing, including correction for motion and intensity inhomogeneity, treating the multi-b-value data as hyperspectral image stacks, applying hyperspectral techniques like band expansion, and evaluating three tumor detection methods: kernel-based constrained energy minimization (KCEM), iterative KCEM (I-KCEM), and deep neural networks (DNNs). The comparisons were assessed by evaluating the similarity of the detection results from each method to ground truth tumor areas, which were manually drawn on DCE-MRI images and confirmed by experienced physicians. Similarity was quantitatively measured using the Dice similarity coefficient and the Jaccard index. Additionally, the performance of the detectors was evaluated using 3D-ROC analysis and its derived criteria (<i>AUC<sub>OD</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>TD</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>BS</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>TD</sub></i><sub>-<i>BS</i></sub>, <i>AUC<sub>ODP</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>SNPR</sub></i>). <b>Results:</b> The findings objectively demonstrated that the DNN method achieved superior performance in breast tumor detection compared to KCEM and I-KCEM. Specifically, the DNN yielded a Dice similarity coefficient of 86.56% and a Jaccard index of 76.30%, whereas KCEM achieved 78.49% (Dice) and 64.60% (Jaccard), and I-KCEM achieved 78.55% (Dice) and 61.37% (Jaccard). Evaluation using 3D-ROC analysis also indicated that the DNN was the best detector based on metrics like target detection rate and overall effectiveness. The DNN model further exhibited the capability to identify tumor heterogeneity, differentiating high- and low-cellularity regions. Quantitative parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (PF), were calculated and analyzed, providing insights into the diffusion characteristics of different breast tissues. Analysis of signal intensity decay curves generated from these parameters further illustrated distinct diffusion patterns and confirmed that high cellularity tumor regions showed greater water molecule confinement compared to low cellularity regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential of combining IVIM-DWI, hyperspectral imaging techniques, and deep learning as a robust, safe, and effective non-invasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer, offering a valuable alternative to contrast-enhanced methods by providing detailed information about tissue microstructure and heterogeneity without the need for contrast agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through IVIM-DWI Parameters and Signal Decay Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Wa Chan, Chun-An Lin, Yen-Chieh Ouyang, Guan-Yuan Chen, Chein-I Chang, Chin-Yao Lin, Chih-Chiang Hung, Chih-Yean Lum, Kuo-Chung Wang, Ming-Cheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> This research presents a novel analytical method for breast tumor characterization and tissue classification by leveraging intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) combined with hyperspectral imaging techniques and deep learning. Traditionally, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is employed for breast tumor diagnosis, but it involves gadolinium-based contrast agents, which carry potential health risks. IVIM imaging extends conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by explicitly separating the signal decay into components representing true molecular diffusion (D) and microcirculation of capillary blood (pseudo-diffusion or D*). This separation allows for a more comprehensive, non-invasive assessment of tissue characteristics without the need for contrast agents, thereby offering a safer alternative for breast cancer diagnosis. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods for breast tumor characterization using IVIM-DWI data treated as hyperspectral image stacks. Dice similarity coefficients and Jaccard indices were specifically used to evaluate the spatial segmentation accuracy of tumor boundaries, confirmed by experienced physicians on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), emphasizing detailed tumor characterization rather than binary diagnosis of cancer. <b>Methods:</b> The data source for this study consisted of breast MRI scans obtained from 22 patients diagnosed with mass-type breast cancer, resulting in 22 distinct mass tumor cases analyzed. MR images were acquired using a 3T MRI system (Discovery MR750 3.0 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with axial IVIM sequences and a bipolar pulsed gradient spin echo sequence. Multiple b-values ranging from 0 to 2500 s/mm<sup>2</sup> were utilized, specifically thirteen original b-values (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>), with the last four b-value images replicated once for a total of 17 bands used in the analysis. The methodology involved several steps: acquisition of multi-b-value IVIM-DWI images, image pre-processing, including correction for motion and intensity inhomogeneity, treating the multi-b-value data as hyperspectral image stacks, applying hyperspectral techniques like band expansion, and evaluating three tumor detection methods: kernel-based constrained energy minimization (KCEM), iterative KCEM (I-KCEM), and deep neural networks (DNNs). The comparisons were assessed by evaluating the similarity of the detection results from each method to ground truth tumor areas, which were manually drawn on DCE-MRI images and confirmed by experienced physicians. Similarity was quantitatively measured using the Dice similarity coefficient and the Jaccard index. Additionally, the performance of the detectors was evaluated using 3D-ROC analysis and its derived criteria (<i>AUC<sub>OD</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>TD</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>BS</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>TD</sub></i><sub>-<i>BS</i></sub>, <i>AUC<sub>ODP</sub></i>, <i>AUC<sub>SNPR</sub></i>). <b>Results:</b> The findings objectively demonstrated that the DNN method achieved superior performance in breast tumor detection compared to KCEM and I-KCEM. Specifically, the DNN yielded a Dice similarity coefficient of 86.56% and a Jaccard index of 76.30%, whereas KCEM achieved 78.49% (Dice) and 64.60% (Jaccard), and I-KCEM achieved 78.55% (Dice) and 61.37% (Jaccard). Evaluation using 3D-ROC analysis also indicated that the DNN was the best detector based on metrics like target detection rate and overall effectiveness. The DNN model further exhibited the capability to identify tumor heterogeneity, differentiating high- and low-cellularity regions. Quantitative parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (PF), were calculated and analyzed, providing insights into the diffusion characteristics of different breast tissues. Analysis of signal intensity decay curves generated from these parameters further illustrated distinct diffusion patterns and confirmed that high cellularity tumor regions showed greater water molecule confinement compared to low cellularity regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential of combining IVIM-DWI, hyperspectral imaging techniques, and deep learning as a robust, safe, and effective non-invasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer, offering a valuable alternative to contrast-enhanced methods by providing detailed information about tissue microstructure and heterogeneity without the need for contrast agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121499\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究提出了一种利用体素内非相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)结合高光谱成像技术和深度学习的乳腺肿瘤特征和组织分类的新分析方法。传统上,动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)用于乳腺肿瘤的诊断,但它涉及到基于钆的对比剂,具有潜在的健康风险。IVIM成像通过明确地将信号衰减分为代表真分子扩散(D)和毛细血管微循环(伪扩散或D*)的分量,扩展了传统的弥散加权成像(DWI)。这种分离可以在不需要造影剂的情况下对组织特征进行更全面、无创的评估,从而为乳腺癌诊断提供了一种更安全的选择。本研究的主要目的是评估将IVIM-DWI数据作为高光谱图像堆栈处理的乳腺肿瘤表征的不同方法。采用骰子相似系数和Jaccard指数评估肿瘤边界的空间分割准确性,由经验丰富的医生在动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)上证实,强调肿瘤的详细特征,而不是癌症的二元诊断。方法:本研究的数据来源为22例肿块型乳腺癌患者的乳腺MRI扫描,分析22例不同的肿块性肿瘤病例。使用3T MRI系统(Discovery MR750 3.0 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA),轴向IVIM序列和双极脉冲梯度自旋回波序列获得MR图像。使用了从0到2500 s/mm2的多个b值,特别是13个原始b值(0、15、30、45、60、100、200、400、600、1000、1500、2000和2500 s/mm2),最后四个b值图像复制一次,用于分析的总共17个波段。该方法包括以下几个步骤:获取多b值IVIM-DWI图像,图像预处理,包括校正运动和强度不均匀性,将多b值数据处理为高光谱图像堆栈,应用波段扩展等高光谱技术,并评估三种肿瘤检测方法:基于核的约束能量最小化(KCEM),迭代KCEM (I-KCEM)和深度神经网络(dnn)。通过评估每种方法的检测结果与真实肿瘤区域的相似性来评估比较,这些区域是人工绘制在DCE-MRI图像上并由经验丰富的医生确认的。使用Dice相似系数和Jaccard指数定量测量相似性。此外,使用3D-ROC分析及其衍生标准(AUCOD, AUCTD, AUCBS, AUCTD- bs, AUCODP, AUCSNPR)评估检测器的性能。结果:研究结果客观地证明了DNN方法在乳腺肿瘤检测方面优于KCEM和I-KCEM。其中,DNN的Dice相似系数为86.56%,Jaccard相似系数为76.30%,而KCEM的Dice相似系数为78.49%,Jaccard相似系数为64.60%,I-KCEM的Dice相似系数为78.55%,Jaccard相似系数为61.37%。使用3D-ROC分析的评估也表明,基于目标检出率和总体有效性等指标,DNN是最佳检测器。DNN模型进一步显示出识别肿瘤异质性、区分高细胞区和低细胞区的能力。计算并分析表观扩散系数(ADC)、纯扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)、灌注分数(PF)等定量参数,深入了解乳腺不同组织的扩散特征。由这些参数产生的信号强度衰减曲线分析进一步说明了不同的扩散模式,并证实高细胞肿瘤区域比低细胞肿瘤区域表现出更大的水分子限制。结论:本研究强调了将IVIM-DWI、高光谱成像技术和深度学习结合起来作为一种强大、安全、有效的非侵入性乳腺癌诊断工具的潜力,通过提供有关组织微观结构和异质性的详细信息而无需造影剂,为对比增强方法提供了有价值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through IVIM-DWI Parameters and Signal Decay Analysis.

Background/Objectives: This research presents a novel analytical method for breast tumor characterization and tissue classification by leveraging intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) combined with hyperspectral imaging techniques and deep learning. Traditionally, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is employed for breast tumor diagnosis, but it involves gadolinium-based contrast agents, which carry potential health risks. IVIM imaging extends conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by explicitly separating the signal decay into components representing true molecular diffusion (D) and microcirculation of capillary blood (pseudo-diffusion or D*). This separation allows for a more comprehensive, non-invasive assessment of tissue characteristics without the need for contrast agents, thereby offering a safer alternative for breast cancer diagnosis. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods for breast tumor characterization using IVIM-DWI data treated as hyperspectral image stacks. Dice similarity coefficients and Jaccard indices were specifically used to evaluate the spatial segmentation accuracy of tumor boundaries, confirmed by experienced physicians on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), emphasizing detailed tumor characterization rather than binary diagnosis of cancer. Methods: The data source for this study consisted of breast MRI scans obtained from 22 patients diagnosed with mass-type breast cancer, resulting in 22 distinct mass tumor cases analyzed. MR images were acquired using a 3T MRI system (Discovery MR750 3.0 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with axial IVIM sequences and a bipolar pulsed gradient spin echo sequence. Multiple b-values ranging from 0 to 2500 s/mm2 were utilized, specifically thirteen original b-values (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm2), with the last four b-value images replicated once for a total of 17 bands used in the analysis. The methodology involved several steps: acquisition of multi-b-value IVIM-DWI images, image pre-processing, including correction for motion and intensity inhomogeneity, treating the multi-b-value data as hyperspectral image stacks, applying hyperspectral techniques like band expansion, and evaluating three tumor detection methods: kernel-based constrained energy minimization (KCEM), iterative KCEM (I-KCEM), and deep neural networks (DNNs). The comparisons were assessed by evaluating the similarity of the detection results from each method to ground truth tumor areas, which were manually drawn on DCE-MRI images and confirmed by experienced physicians. Similarity was quantitatively measured using the Dice similarity coefficient and the Jaccard index. Additionally, the performance of the detectors was evaluated using 3D-ROC analysis and its derived criteria (AUCOD, AUCTD, AUCBS, AUCTD-BS, AUCODP, AUCSNPR). Results: The findings objectively demonstrated that the DNN method achieved superior performance in breast tumor detection compared to KCEM and I-KCEM. Specifically, the DNN yielded a Dice similarity coefficient of 86.56% and a Jaccard index of 76.30%, whereas KCEM achieved 78.49% (Dice) and 64.60% (Jaccard), and I-KCEM achieved 78.55% (Dice) and 61.37% (Jaccard). Evaluation using 3D-ROC analysis also indicated that the DNN was the best detector based on metrics like target detection rate and overall effectiveness. The DNN model further exhibited the capability to identify tumor heterogeneity, differentiating high- and low-cellularity regions. Quantitative parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (PF), were calculated and analyzed, providing insights into the diffusion characteristics of different breast tissues. Analysis of signal intensity decay curves generated from these parameters further illustrated distinct diffusion patterns and confirmed that high cellularity tumor regions showed greater water molecule confinement compared to low cellularity regions. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of combining IVIM-DWI, hyperspectral imaging techniques, and deep learning as a robust, safe, and effective non-invasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer, offering a valuable alternative to contrast-enhanced methods by providing detailed information about tissue microstructure and heterogeneity without the need for contrast agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信