非典型脂肪瘤与脂肪瘤:多模式诊断方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wolfram Weschenfelder, Katharina Lucia Koeglmeier, Friederike Weschenfelder, Christian Spiegel, Amer Malouhi, Nikolaus Gassler, Gunther Olaf Hofmann
{"title":"非典型脂肪瘤与脂肪瘤:多模式诊断方法。","authors":"Wolfram Weschenfelder, Katharina Lucia Koeglmeier, Friederike Weschenfelder, Christian Spiegel, Amer Malouhi, Nikolaus Gassler, Gunther Olaf Hofmann","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to develop a reliable scoring system combining clinical and radiological parameters to distinguish atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs) from lipomas, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing expensive molecular pathology testing. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis of 188 patients who underwent surgery for lipomatous tumours was conducted. Patient data, including medical history, pathology, and MRI imaging results, were reviewed. Four predictive models were developed using various clinical and imaging parameters, including age, tumour size, location, and MRI characteristics (homogeneity, contrast enhancement). Statistical analysis, including ROC curve analysis and logistic regression, was performed to assess the accuracy of these models. <b>Results</b>: The highest predictive accuracy was achieved with Model 1, which included seven parameters, yielding an AUC of 0.952. This model achieved a sensitivity of 96.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.2%. Reducing the number of parameters lowered the accuracy, with contrast enhancement playing a significant role in Model 1. A risk calculator based on the optimal model was developed, offering an effective tool for clinical use that can be provided. Notably, 21 out of 37 ALTs lacked atypia and would have been missed without molecular testing. <b>Conclusions</b>: The developed scoring system, based on clinical and imaging parameters, accurately distinguishes ALTs from lipomas, offering a practical alternative to molecular pathology testing. This multi-parameter approach significantly improves diagnostic reliability, reducing the risk of misclassification and false negatives, while also potentially lowering healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical Lipomatous Tumours vs. Lipomas: A Multimodal Diagnostic Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfram Weschenfelder, Katharina Lucia Koeglmeier, Friederike Weschenfelder, Christian Spiegel, Amer Malouhi, Nikolaus Gassler, Gunther Olaf Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to develop a reliable scoring system combining clinical and radiological parameters to distinguish atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs) from lipomas, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing expensive molecular pathology testing. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis of 188 patients who underwent surgery for lipomatous tumours was conducted. Patient data, including medical history, pathology, and MRI imaging results, were reviewed. Four predictive models were developed using various clinical and imaging parameters, including age, tumour size, location, and MRI characteristics (homogeneity, contrast enhancement). Statistical analysis, including ROC curve analysis and logistic regression, was performed to assess the accuracy of these models. <b>Results</b>: The highest predictive accuracy was achieved with Model 1, which included seven parameters, yielding an AUC of 0.952. This model achieved a sensitivity of 96.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.2%. Reducing the number of parameters lowered the accuracy, with contrast enhancement playing a significant role in Model 1. A risk calculator based on the optimal model was developed, offering an effective tool for clinical use that can be provided. Notably, 21 out of 37 ALTs lacked atypia and would have been missed without molecular testing. <b>Conclusions</b>: The developed scoring system, based on clinical and imaging parameters, accurately distinguishes ALTs from lipomas, offering a practical alternative to molecular pathology testing. This multi-parameter approach significantly improves diagnostic reliability, reducing the risk of misclassification and false negatives, while also potentially lowering healthcare costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在建立一种结合临床和影像学参数的可靠评分系统,以区分非典型脂肪瘤(ALTs)和脂肪瘤,提高诊断准确性,减少昂贵的分子病理学检测。方法:对188例脂肪瘤性肿瘤手术患者进行回顾性分析。回顾了患者资料,包括病史、病理和MRI成像结果。使用不同的临床和影像学参数,包括年龄、肿瘤大小、位置和MRI特征(均匀性、对比度增强),建立了四种预测模型。统计分析包括ROC曲线分析和logistic回归分析,以评估模型的准确性。结果:模型1的预测精度最高,模型1包含7个参数,AUC为0.952。该模型的敏感性为96.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为97.2%。减少参数数量会降低准确率,其中对比度增强在模型1中起着重要作用。基于最优模型开发了风险计算器,为临床提供了一种有效的工具。值得注意的是,37个alt中有21个缺乏异型性,如果没有分子检测就会被遗漏。结论:基于临床和影像学参数开发的评分系统可以准确区分脂肪瘤和脂肪瘤,为分子病理学检测提供了一种实用的替代方法。这种多参数方法显著提高了诊断可靠性,降低了错误分类和假阴性的风险,同时还可能降低医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atypical Lipomatous Tumours vs. Lipomas: A Multimodal Diagnostic Approach.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to develop a reliable scoring system combining clinical and radiological parameters to distinguish atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs) from lipomas, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing expensive molecular pathology testing. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 188 patients who underwent surgery for lipomatous tumours was conducted. Patient data, including medical history, pathology, and MRI imaging results, were reviewed. Four predictive models were developed using various clinical and imaging parameters, including age, tumour size, location, and MRI characteristics (homogeneity, contrast enhancement). Statistical analysis, including ROC curve analysis and logistic regression, was performed to assess the accuracy of these models. Results: The highest predictive accuracy was achieved with Model 1, which included seven parameters, yielding an AUC of 0.952. This model achieved a sensitivity of 96.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.2%. Reducing the number of parameters lowered the accuracy, with contrast enhancement playing a significant role in Model 1. A risk calculator based on the optimal model was developed, offering an effective tool for clinical use that can be provided. Notably, 21 out of 37 ALTs lacked atypia and would have been missed without molecular testing. Conclusions: The developed scoring system, based on clinical and imaging parameters, accurately distinguishes ALTs from lipomas, offering a practical alternative to molecular pathology testing. This multi-parameter approach significantly improves diagnostic reliability, reducing the risk of misclassification and false negatives, while also potentially lowering healthcare costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信