Octavian Enciu, Elena-Adelina Toma, Valentin Calu, Dumitru Cătălin Pîrîianu, Andrei Ludovic Poroșnicu, Adrian Miron, Mircea Ioan Popa
{"title":"肺炎克雷伯菌侵袭性肝脓肿综合征(Klas/Ilas)-单一中心的经验和最新文献综述。","authors":"Octavian Enciu, Elena-Adelina Toma, Valentin Calu, Dumitru Cătălin Pîrîianu, Andrei Ludovic Poroșnicu, Adrian Miron, Mircea Ioan Popa","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15121533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> liver abscess (KLAS) is a potentially life-threatening condition with variable outcomes. Identifying risk factors for mortality is crucial for improving patient management. We aimed to analyze factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with KLAS and review current diagnostic and treatment challenges. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and treatment data from 20 patients admitted with KLAS. Patients were divided into survivor (<i>n</i> = 15) and non-survivor (<i>n</i> = 5) groups. Univariate analyses were performed using appropriate statistical tests to compare groups and identify mortality-related factors. <b>Results</b>: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 25.0% (5/20). Factors significantly associated with mortality included undergoing laparotomy drainage (60.0% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and developing in-hospital complications (80.0% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Laparoscopic drainage was significantly associated with survival (93.3% vs. 40.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Trends toward increased mortality were observed with diabetes mellitus and higher glucose levels at admission. Despite <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 from prior Fisher's exact test, and the fact that ESBL positivity (OR = 22, 95% CI 0.86-571.32) and septic shock at admission (OR = 16.08, 95% CI 0.75-343.64) showed a very high point estimate for risk of mortality, the association was not statistically significant in our study. <b>Conclusions</b>: Mortality in this KLAS cohort was considerable. The necessity for open drainage and the development of in-hospital complications emerged as significant predictors of death, while other independent risk factor such as diabetes mellitus, high blood glucose levels at admission, septic shock at admission, and ESBL-positive strains indicated a trend towards unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of aggressive sepsis management and addressing antimicrobial resistance. Conflicting results regarding the statistical significance of independent risk factors due to a limited sample size highlight the need for larger studies to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> Invasive Liver Abscess Syndrome (Klas/Ilas)-Experience of a Single Center and Up-to-Date Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Octavian Enciu, Elena-Adelina Toma, Valentin Calu, Dumitru Cătălin Pîrîianu, Andrei Ludovic Poroșnicu, Adrian Miron, Mircea Ioan Popa\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15121533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> liver abscess (KLAS) is a potentially life-threatening condition with variable outcomes. Identifying risk factors for mortality is crucial for improving patient management. We aimed to analyze factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with KLAS and review current diagnostic and treatment challenges. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and treatment data from 20 patients admitted with KLAS. Patients were divided into survivor (<i>n</i> = 15) and non-survivor (<i>n</i> = 5) groups. Univariate analyses were performed using appropriate statistical tests to compare groups and identify mortality-related factors. <b>Results</b>: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 25.0% (5/20). Factors significantly associated with mortality included undergoing laparotomy drainage (60.0% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and developing in-hospital complications (80.0% vs. 6.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Laparoscopic drainage was significantly associated with survival (93.3% vs. 40.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Trends toward increased mortality were observed with diabetes mellitus and higher glucose levels at admission. Despite <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 from prior Fisher's exact test, and the fact that ESBL positivity (OR = 22, 95% CI 0.86-571.32) and septic shock at admission (OR = 16.08, 95% CI 0.75-343.64) showed a very high point estimate for risk of mortality, the association was not statistically significant in our study. <b>Conclusions</b>: Mortality in this KLAS cohort was considerable. The necessity for open drainage and the development of in-hospital complications emerged as significant predictors of death, while other independent risk factor such as diabetes mellitus, high blood glucose levels at admission, septic shock at admission, and ESBL-positive strains indicated a trend towards unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of aggressive sepsis management and addressing antimicrobial resistance. Conflicting results regarding the statistical significance of independent risk factors due to a limited sample size highlight the need for larger studies to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121533\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿(KLAS)是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,预后不一。确定死亡率的危险因素对于改善患者管理至关重要。我们的目的是分析与KLAS患者队列中住院死亡率相关的因素,并回顾当前的诊断和治疗挑战。方法:回顾性分析20例KLAS患者的临床、实验室、微生物学和治疗资料。患者分为生存组(n = 15)和非生存组(n = 5)。采用适当的统计检验进行单变量分析,以比较各组并确定与死亡相关的因素。结果:住院总死亡率为25.0%(5/20)。与死亡率显著相关的因素包括开腹引流(60.0%比6.7%,p = 0.018)和院内并发症(80.0%比6.7%,p = 0.002)。腹腔镜引流与生存率显著相关(93.3% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.026)。入院时伴有糖尿病和高血糖的患者死亡率有增加的趋势。尽管先前Fisher精确检验的p值< 0.05,而且入院时ESBL阳性(OR = 22, 95% CI 0.86-571.32)和脓毒性休克(OR = 16.08, 95% CI 0.75-343.64)对死亡风险的点估计值非常高,但在我们的研究中,这种关联没有统计学意义。结论:该KLAS队列的死亡率相当高。开放引流的必要性和院内并发症的发展成为死亡的重要预测因素,而其他独立的危险因素,如糖尿病、入院时高血糖水平、入院时感染性休克和esbl阳性菌株,表明了不利结果的趋势。这些发现强调了积极脓毒症管理和解决抗菌素耐药性的重要性。由于样本量有限,关于独立风险因素的统计意义的相互矛盾的结果强调需要进行更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
Klebsiella pneumoniae Invasive Liver Abscess Syndrome (Klas/Ilas)-Experience of a Single Center and Up-to-Date Review of the Literature.
Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KLAS) is a potentially life-threatening condition with variable outcomes. Identifying risk factors for mortality is crucial for improving patient management. We aimed to analyze factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with KLAS and review current diagnostic and treatment challenges. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and treatment data from 20 patients admitted with KLAS. Patients were divided into survivor (n = 15) and non-survivor (n = 5) groups. Univariate analyses were performed using appropriate statistical tests to compare groups and identify mortality-related factors. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 25.0% (5/20). Factors significantly associated with mortality included undergoing laparotomy drainage (60.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.018) and developing in-hospital complications (80.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.002). Laparoscopic drainage was significantly associated with survival (93.3% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.026). Trends toward increased mortality were observed with diabetes mellitus and higher glucose levels at admission. Despite p-values < 0.05 from prior Fisher's exact test, and the fact that ESBL positivity (OR = 22, 95% CI 0.86-571.32) and septic shock at admission (OR = 16.08, 95% CI 0.75-343.64) showed a very high point estimate for risk of mortality, the association was not statistically significant in our study. Conclusions: Mortality in this KLAS cohort was considerable. The necessity for open drainage and the development of in-hospital complications emerged as significant predictors of death, while other independent risk factor such as diabetes mellitus, high blood glucose levels at admission, septic shock at admission, and ESBL-positive strains indicated a trend towards unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of aggressive sepsis management and addressing antimicrobial resistance. Conflicting results regarding the statistical significance of independent risk factors due to a limited sample size highlight the need for larger studies to confirm these findings.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.