实时SPR生物传感检测和表征端点检测错过的快速解离率结合相互作用和脱靶毒性筛选的意义。

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomolecules Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/biom15060882
William Martelly, Rebecca L Cook, Chidozie Victor Agu, Lydia R Gushgari, Salvador Moreno, Sailaja Kesiraju, Mukilan Mohan, Bharath Takulapalli
{"title":"实时SPR生物传感检测和表征端点检测错过的快速解离率结合相互作用和脱靶毒性筛选的意义。","authors":"William Martelly, Rebecca L Cook, Chidozie Victor Agu, Lydia R Gushgari, Salvador Moreno, Sailaja Kesiraju, Mukilan Mohan, Bharath Takulapalli","doi":"10.3390/biom15060882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate detection of biomolecular interactions is essential in many areas, from the detection of the presence of biomarkers in the clinic to the development of therapeutic drugs and biologics in biopharma to the understanding of various biological processes in basic research. Traditional endpoint approaches can suffer from false-negative results for biomolecular interactions with fast kinetics. By contrast, real-time detection techniques like surface plasmon resonance (SPR) monitor interactions as they form and disassemble, reducing the risk of false-negative results. By leveraging cell-free expressed proteins captured on either glass or SPR biosensors and using two different commercial antibodies with variable off-rates that both target HaloTag antigens as a model, we compare and contrast results from a fluorescence endpoint assay versus real-time sensor-integrated proteome on chip (SPOC<sup>®</sup>) SPR-based detection. In this study, we illustrate the limitations of the representative immunofluorescent endpoint assay when investigating transient interactions characterized by fast dissociation rates. We highlight the importance of choosing reagents well suited to the selected assay, as well as the importance of considering binding kinetics and protein ligand conformational states when interpreting results from binding assays, especially for applications as critical as the off-target screening of therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8943,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Time SPR Biosensing to Detect and Characterize Fast Dissociation Rate Binding Interactions Missed by Endpoint Detection and Implications for Off-Target Toxicity Screening.\",\"authors\":\"William Martelly, Rebecca L Cook, Chidozie Victor Agu, Lydia R Gushgari, Salvador Moreno, Sailaja Kesiraju, Mukilan Mohan, Bharath Takulapalli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biom15060882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate detection of biomolecular interactions is essential in many areas, from the detection of the presence of biomarkers in the clinic to the development of therapeutic drugs and biologics in biopharma to the understanding of various biological processes in basic research. Traditional endpoint approaches can suffer from false-negative results for biomolecular interactions with fast kinetics. By contrast, real-time detection techniques like surface plasmon resonance (SPR) monitor interactions as they form and disassemble, reducing the risk of false-negative results. By leveraging cell-free expressed proteins captured on either glass or SPR biosensors and using two different commercial antibodies with variable off-rates that both target HaloTag antigens as a model, we compare and contrast results from a fluorescence endpoint assay versus real-time sensor-integrated proteome on chip (SPOC<sup>®</sup>) SPR-based detection. In this study, we illustrate the limitations of the representative immunofluorescent endpoint assay when investigating transient interactions characterized by fast dissociation rates. We highlight the importance of choosing reagents well suited to the selected assay, as well as the importance of considering binding kinetics and protein ligand conformational states when interpreting results from binding assays, especially for applications as critical as the off-target screening of therapeutics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecules\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15060882\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15060882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从临床中检测生物标志物的存在,到生物制药中治疗药物和生物制剂的开发,再到基础研究中对各种生物过程的理解,准确检测生物分子相互作用在许多领域都是必不可少的。对于快速动力学的生物分子相互作用,传统的终点方法可能会出现假阴性结果。相比之下,像表面等离子体共振(SPR)这样的实时检测技术可以监测它们形成和分解时的相互作用,从而降低了假阴性结果的风险。通过利用在玻璃或SPR生物传感器上捕获的无细胞表达蛋白,并使用两种不同的商业抗体,其具有可变的脱靶率,都以HaloTag抗原为模型,我们比较和对比了荧光终点分析和实时传感器集成的蛋白质组芯片(SPOC®)基于SPR的检测结果。在这项研究中,我们说明了代表性免疫荧光终点分析在研究以快速解离率为特征的瞬时相互作用时的局限性。我们强调选择非常适合所选分析的试剂的重要性,以及在解释结合分析结果时考虑结合动力学和蛋白质配体构象状态的重要性,特别是对于治疗方法脱靶筛选等关键应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-Time SPR Biosensing to Detect and Characterize Fast Dissociation Rate Binding Interactions Missed by Endpoint Detection and Implications for Off-Target Toxicity Screening.

Accurate detection of biomolecular interactions is essential in many areas, from the detection of the presence of biomarkers in the clinic to the development of therapeutic drugs and biologics in biopharma to the understanding of various biological processes in basic research. Traditional endpoint approaches can suffer from false-negative results for biomolecular interactions with fast kinetics. By contrast, real-time detection techniques like surface plasmon resonance (SPR) monitor interactions as they form and disassemble, reducing the risk of false-negative results. By leveraging cell-free expressed proteins captured on either glass or SPR biosensors and using two different commercial antibodies with variable off-rates that both target HaloTag antigens as a model, we compare and contrast results from a fluorescence endpoint assay versus real-time sensor-integrated proteome on chip (SPOC®) SPR-based detection. In this study, we illustrate the limitations of the representative immunofluorescent endpoint assay when investigating transient interactions characterized by fast dissociation rates. We highlight the importance of choosing reagents well suited to the selected assay, as well as the importance of considering binding kinetics and protein ligand conformational states when interpreting results from binding assays, especially for applications as critical as the off-target screening of therapeutics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecules
Biomolecules Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.28 days
期刊介绍: Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on biogenic substances and their biological functions, structures, interactions with other molecules, and their microenvironment as well as biological systems. Biomolecules publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications.  Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信