血液培养对转移到四级护理中心的软组织感染患者的有限诊断价值。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mira H Ghneim, Gregory M Schrank, William Teeter, Brooke Andersen, Anna Brown, Quincy K Tran
{"title":"血液培养对转移到四级护理中心的软组织感染患者的有限诊断价值。","authors":"Mira H Ghneim, Gregory M Schrank, William Teeter, Brooke Andersen, Anna Brown, Quincy K Tran","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12060609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Patients with soft tissue infection are often encountered in clinical practice. The mainstay of treatment typically includes antimicrobial therapy, followed by surgical debridement when indicated. Blood cultures are often performed prior to starting the first dose of antibiotics. However, when patients require transfer to tertiary/quaternary-level care for more advanced surgical interventions, blood cultures are often repeated despite patients being on broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our study aims to investigate the utility of blood cultures following transfer to a higher level of care. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective study involving adult patients (≥18 years of age) who were transferred to a quaternary academic center with soft tissue infections between 15 June 2018 and 15 February 2022. Patients with incomplete medical records and/or without blood culture data after arrival were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of positive blood cultures post-transfer. Descriptive analyses were performed, and comparisons between groups were expressed as absolute differences and 95% CI. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 303 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 54 (14) years, and 199 (66%) were male. Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) predominated, 198 patients (65%), with a majority of the NSTIs involving the perineum (112, 37%). The prevalence of positive blood cultures was 20 (7%) for pre-transfer and 14 (5%) for post-transfer. Among post-transfer positive blood cultures, 3 (21%) were coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus aureus,</i> with 2 (14%) cases each for the blood culture categories of polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, and 2 (14%) with <i>Candida species</i>. Among 112 patients with NSTIs of the perineum, 2 (14%) patients had positive blood cultures post-transfer, compared with 110 (38%) patients with negative blood cultures (difference 24%, 95% CI -0.40, -0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> For patients with soft tissue infection, the prevalence of positive blood culture after arrival at our quaternary care center was low at 5%. Pathogenic cases of positive blood cultures after transfer were polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Candida</i> species. However, the low number of post-transfer positive blood cultures limits the strength of the inference and should be interpreted cautiously. Further studies are necessary to confirm our observation. Clinicians at tertiary/quaternary care centers should consider the utility of obtaining blood cultures from patients with soft tissue infections transferred from other facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Diagnostic Value of Blood Cultures in Patients with Soft Tissue Infections Transferred to a Quaternary Care Center.\",\"authors\":\"Mira H Ghneim, Gregory M Schrank, William Teeter, Brooke Andersen, Anna Brown, Quincy K Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12060609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Patients with soft tissue infection are often encountered in clinical practice. The mainstay of treatment typically includes antimicrobial therapy, followed by surgical debridement when indicated. Blood cultures are often performed prior to starting the first dose of antibiotics. However, when patients require transfer to tertiary/quaternary-level care for more advanced surgical interventions, blood cultures are often repeated despite patients being on broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our study aims to investigate the utility of blood cultures following transfer to a higher level of care. <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective study involving adult patients (≥18 years of age) who were transferred to a quaternary academic center with soft tissue infections between 15 June 2018 and 15 February 2022. Patients with incomplete medical records and/or without blood culture data after arrival were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of positive blood cultures post-transfer. Descriptive analyses were performed, and comparisons between groups were expressed as absolute differences and 95% CI. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed 303 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 54 (14) years, and 199 (66%) were male. Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) predominated, 198 patients (65%), with a majority of the NSTIs involving the perineum (112, 37%). The prevalence of positive blood cultures was 20 (7%) for pre-transfer and 14 (5%) for post-transfer. Among post-transfer positive blood cultures, 3 (21%) were coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus aureus,</i> with 2 (14%) cases each for the blood culture categories of polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, and 2 (14%) with <i>Candida species</i>. Among 112 patients with NSTIs of the perineum, 2 (14%) patients had positive blood cultures post-transfer, compared with 110 (38%) patients with negative blood cultures (difference 24%, 95% CI -0.40, -0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> For patients with soft tissue infection, the prevalence of positive blood culture after arrival at our quaternary care center was low at 5%. Pathogenic cases of positive blood cultures after transfer were polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Candida</i> species. However, the low number of post-transfer positive blood cultures limits the strength of the inference and should be interpreted cautiously. Further studies are necessary to confirm our observation. Clinicians at tertiary/quaternary care centers should consider the utility of obtaining blood cultures from patients with soft tissue infections transferred from other facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060609\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床实践中,经常会遇到软组织感染患者。主要的治疗方法通常包括抗菌药物治疗,然后在需要时进行手术清创。血液培养通常在开始使用第一剂抗生素之前进行。然而,当患者需要转到三级/四级护理以进行更高级的手术干预时,尽管患者使用了广谱抗生素,但仍经常重复血液培养。我们的研究旨在调查血液培养的效用后转移到更高的护理水平。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及2018年6月15日至2022年2月15日期间因软组织感染转移到第四学术中心的成年患者(≥18岁)。医疗记录不完整和/或到达后没有血液培养数据的患者被排除在外。主要结果是移植后血培养阳性的比率。进行描述性分析,组间比较用绝对差异和95% CI表示。结果:我们分析了303例患者,平均(+/-SD)年龄为54(14)岁,其中199例(66%)为男性。坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)占多数,198例(65%),其中大部分NSTIs累及会阴(112,37%)。移植前血培养阳性率为20(7%),移植后血培养阳性率为14(5%)。移植后阳性血培养中,凝固酶阴性金黄色葡萄球菌3例(21%),多微生物、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌血培养各2例(14%),念珠菌血培养2例(14%)。112例会阴NSTIs患者中,2例(14%)患者移植后血培养阳性,110例(38%)患者血培养阴性(差异24%,95% CI -0.40, -0.12, p < 0.001)。结论:软组织感染患者到本中心后血培养阳性的比例较低,仅为5%。转移后血培养阳性的病原菌为多微生物、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌和念珠菌。然而,移植后阳性血培养的低数量限制了推断的强度,应谨慎解释。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的观察。三级/四级护理中心的临床医生应考虑从其他机构转移的软组织感染患者获得血培养的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited Diagnostic Value of Blood Cultures in Patients with Soft Tissue Infections Transferred to a Quaternary Care Center.

Introduction: Patients with soft tissue infection are often encountered in clinical practice. The mainstay of treatment typically includes antimicrobial therapy, followed by surgical debridement when indicated. Blood cultures are often performed prior to starting the first dose of antibiotics. However, when patients require transfer to tertiary/quaternary-level care for more advanced surgical interventions, blood cultures are often repeated despite patients being on broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our study aims to investigate the utility of blood cultures following transfer to a higher level of care. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving adult patients (≥18 years of age) who were transferred to a quaternary academic center with soft tissue infections between 15 June 2018 and 15 February 2022. Patients with incomplete medical records and/or without blood culture data after arrival were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of positive blood cultures post-transfer. Descriptive analyses were performed, and comparisons between groups were expressed as absolute differences and 95% CI. Results: We analyzed 303 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 54 (14) years, and 199 (66%) were male. Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) predominated, 198 patients (65%), with a majority of the NSTIs involving the perineum (112, 37%). The prevalence of positive blood cultures was 20 (7%) for pre-transfer and 14 (5%) for post-transfer. Among post-transfer positive blood cultures, 3 (21%) were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus, with 2 (14%) cases each for the blood culture categories of polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis, and 2 (14%) with Candida species. Among 112 patients with NSTIs of the perineum, 2 (14%) patients had positive blood cultures post-transfer, compared with 110 (38%) patients with negative blood cultures (difference 24%, 95% CI -0.40, -0.12, p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients with soft tissue infection, the prevalence of positive blood culture after arrival at our quaternary care center was low at 5%. Pathogenic cases of positive blood cultures after transfer were polymicrobial, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Candida species. However, the low number of post-transfer positive blood cultures limits the strength of the inference and should be interpreted cautiously. Further studies are necessary to confirm our observation. Clinicians at tertiary/quaternary care centers should consider the utility of obtaining blood cultures from patients with soft tissue infections transferred from other facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信