{"title":"脑电驱动的手臂运动解码:结合连接和振幅特征增强脑机接口性能。","authors":"Hamidreza Darvishi, Ahmadreza Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein Maghami, Meysam Sadeghi, Mohamad Sawan","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12060614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate electroencephalography (EEG) signals into control commands, offering potential solutions for motor-impaired individuals. While traditional BCI studies often focus solely on amplitude variations or inter-channel connectivity, movement-related brain activity is inherently dynamic, involving interactions across regions and frequency bands. We propose that combining amplitude-based (filter bank common spatial patterns, FBCSP) and phase-based connectivity features (phase-locking value, PLV) improves decoding accuracy. EEG signals from ten healthy subjects were recorded during arm movements, with electromyography (EMG) as ground truth. After preprocessing (resampling, normalization, bandpass filtering), FBCSP and multi-lag PLV features were fused, and the ReliefF algorithm selected the most informative subset. A feedforward neural network achieved average metrics of: Pearson correlation 0.829 ± 0.077, R-squared value 0.675 ± 0.126, and root mean square error (RMSE) 0.579 ± 0.098 in predicting EMG amplitudes indicative of arm movement angles. Analysis highlighted contributions from both FBCSP and PLV, particularly in the 4-8 Hz and 24-28 Hz bands. This fusion approach, augmented by data-driven feature selection, significantly enhances movement decoding accuracy, advancing robust neuroprosthetic control systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EEG-Driven Arm Movement Decoding: Combining Connectivity and Amplitude Features for Enhanced Brain-Computer Interface Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Darvishi, Ahmadreza Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein Maghami, Meysam Sadeghi, Mohamad Sawan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12060614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate electroencephalography (EEG) signals into control commands, offering potential solutions for motor-impaired individuals. While traditional BCI studies often focus solely on amplitude variations or inter-channel connectivity, movement-related brain activity is inherently dynamic, involving interactions across regions and frequency bands. We propose that combining amplitude-based (filter bank common spatial patterns, FBCSP) and phase-based connectivity features (phase-locking value, PLV) improves decoding accuracy. EEG signals from ten healthy subjects were recorded during arm movements, with electromyography (EMG) as ground truth. After preprocessing (resampling, normalization, bandpass filtering), FBCSP and multi-lag PLV features were fused, and the ReliefF algorithm selected the most informative subset. A feedforward neural network achieved average metrics of: Pearson correlation 0.829 ± 0.077, R-squared value 0.675 ± 0.126, and root mean square error (RMSE) 0.579 ± 0.098 in predicting EMG amplitudes indicative of arm movement angles. Analysis highlighted contributions from both FBCSP and PLV, particularly in the 4-8 Hz and 24-28 Hz bands. This fusion approach, augmented by data-driven feature selection, significantly enhances movement decoding accuracy, advancing robust neuroprosthetic control systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060614\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
EEG-Driven Arm Movement Decoding: Combining Connectivity and Amplitude Features for Enhanced Brain-Computer Interface Performance.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate electroencephalography (EEG) signals into control commands, offering potential solutions for motor-impaired individuals. While traditional BCI studies often focus solely on amplitude variations or inter-channel connectivity, movement-related brain activity is inherently dynamic, involving interactions across regions and frequency bands. We propose that combining amplitude-based (filter bank common spatial patterns, FBCSP) and phase-based connectivity features (phase-locking value, PLV) improves decoding accuracy. EEG signals from ten healthy subjects were recorded during arm movements, with electromyography (EMG) as ground truth. After preprocessing (resampling, normalization, bandpass filtering), FBCSP and multi-lag PLV features were fused, and the ReliefF algorithm selected the most informative subset. A feedforward neural network achieved average metrics of: Pearson correlation 0.829 ± 0.077, R-squared value 0.675 ± 0.126, and root mean square error (RMSE) 0.579 ± 0.098 in predicting EMG amplitudes indicative of arm movement angles. Analysis highlighted contributions from both FBCSP and PLV, particularly in the 4-8 Hz and 24-28 Hz bands. This fusion approach, augmented by data-driven feature selection, significantly enhances movement decoding accuracy, advancing robust neuroprosthetic control systems.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering