{"title":"布里渊光学扫描系统在圆锥角膜局部生物力学评价中的应用及其与Corvis ST参数的相关性。","authors":"Qiuruo Jiang, Yichen Sun, Zhanhao Gu, Lumeng Wang, Yiqiang Wu, Jialu Chen, Zhiyi Chen, Xiaobo Zheng, Shihao Chen","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12060634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: The early diagnosis of keratoconus is critical for prognosis. Traditional methods like ORA and Corvis ST measure overall corneal biomechanics but lack regional specificity and are affected by intraocular pressure. In contrast, Brillouin microscopy assesses regional corneal biomechanics without such limitations; (2) Methods: In total, 25 keratoconus patients and 28 healthy controls were included in this study. Corneal biomechanics were measured using the BOSS system (Brillouin Optical Scanning System) in a 10-point mode within an 8 mm diameter, and included the mean, maximum, minimum and standard Brillouin shift. The Corvis ST parameters extracted included the CBI (Corneal Biomechanical Index), CCBI (Corvis Biomechanical Index for Chinese populations), SSI (Stress-Strain Index), DA (Deformation Amplitude), IIR (Inverse Integrated Radius), and SP-A1 (Stiffness Parameter at First Applanation); (3) Results: BOSS showed significant differences in the inferior nasal region (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and central region (<i>p</i> = 0.029) between groups, but not in peripheral regions (<i>p</i> = 0.781). In a comparison of the Brillouin frequency shifts measured between groups, there was no difference in the Mean (<i>p</i> = 0.452) and Max (<i>p</i> = 0.487), but the Min (<i>p</i> = 0.003), Standard (<i>p</i> = 0.000), and Max-Min (<i>p</i> = 0.006) all showed differences. Corvis ST identified significant differences in six parameters (CBI, CCBI, SSI, DA, IIR, and SP-A1) between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Correlations were found between the BOSS and Corvis ST results, with moderate correlations in the inferior nasal region; (4) Conclusions: The BOSS Brillouin microscope can provide an accurate diagnostic evaluation for the corneal biomechanical differences between normal eyes and keratoconus, independent of IOP (Intraocular Pressure) and CCT (Central Corneal Thickness), with a good correlation with Corvis ST, especially in assessing regional biomechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Brillouin Optical Scanning System in the Regional Corneal Biomechanical Evaluation of Keratoconus and Its Correlation with Corvis ST Parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Qiuruo Jiang, Yichen Sun, Zhanhao Gu, Lumeng Wang, Yiqiang Wu, Jialu Chen, Zhiyi Chen, Xiaobo Zheng, Shihao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12060634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Background: The early diagnosis of keratoconus is critical for prognosis. Traditional methods like ORA and Corvis ST measure overall corneal biomechanics but lack regional specificity and are affected by intraocular pressure. In contrast, Brillouin microscopy assesses regional corneal biomechanics without such limitations; (2) Methods: In total, 25 keratoconus patients and 28 healthy controls were included in this study. Corneal biomechanics were measured using the BOSS system (Brillouin Optical Scanning System) in a 10-point mode within an 8 mm diameter, and included the mean, maximum, minimum and standard Brillouin shift. The Corvis ST parameters extracted included the CBI (Corneal Biomechanical Index), CCBI (Corvis Biomechanical Index for Chinese populations), SSI (Stress-Strain Index), DA (Deformation Amplitude), IIR (Inverse Integrated Radius), and SP-A1 (Stiffness Parameter at First Applanation); (3) Results: BOSS showed significant differences in the inferior nasal region (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and central region (<i>p</i> = 0.029) between groups, but not in peripheral regions (<i>p</i> = 0.781). In a comparison of the Brillouin frequency shifts measured between groups, there was no difference in the Mean (<i>p</i> = 0.452) and Max (<i>p</i> = 0.487), but the Min (<i>p</i> = 0.003), Standard (<i>p</i> = 0.000), and Max-Min (<i>p</i> = 0.006) all showed differences. Corvis ST identified significant differences in six parameters (CBI, CCBI, SSI, DA, IIR, and SP-A1) between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Correlations were found between the BOSS and Corvis ST results, with moderate correlations in the inferior nasal region; (4) Conclusions: The BOSS Brillouin microscope can provide an accurate diagnostic evaluation for the corneal biomechanical differences between normal eyes and keratoconus, independent of IOP (Intraocular Pressure) and CCT (Central Corneal Thickness), with a good correlation with Corvis ST, especially in assessing regional biomechanics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of the Brillouin Optical Scanning System in the Regional Corneal Biomechanical Evaluation of Keratoconus and Its Correlation with Corvis ST Parameters.
(1) Background: The early diagnosis of keratoconus is critical for prognosis. Traditional methods like ORA and Corvis ST measure overall corneal biomechanics but lack regional specificity and are affected by intraocular pressure. In contrast, Brillouin microscopy assesses regional corneal biomechanics without such limitations; (2) Methods: In total, 25 keratoconus patients and 28 healthy controls were included in this study. Corneal biomechanics were measured using the BOSS system (Brillouin Optical Scanning System) in a 10-point mode within an 8 mm diameter, and included the mean, maximum, minimum and standard Brillouin shift. The Corvis ST parameters extracted included the CBI (Corneal Biomechanical Index), CCBI (Corvis Biomechanical Index for Chinese populations), SSI (Stress-Strain Index), DA (Deformation Amplitude), IIR (Inverse Integrated Radius), and SP-A1 (Stiffness Parameter at First Applanation); (3) Results: BOSS showed significant differences in the inferior nasal region (p = 0.004) and central region (p = 0.029) between groups, but not in peripheral regions (p = 0.781). In a comparison of the Brillouin frequency shifts measured between groups, there was no difference in the Mean (p = 0.452) and Max (p = 0.487), but the Min (p = 0.003), Standard (p = 0.000), and Max-Min (p = 0.006) all showed differences. Corvis ST identified significant differences in six parameters (CBI, CCBI, SSI, DA, IIR, and SP-A1) between groups (p < 0.001). Correlations were found between the BOSS and Corvis ST results, with moderate correlations in the inferior nasal region; (4) Conclusions: The BOSS Brillouin microscope can provide an accurate diagnostic evaluation for the corneal biomechanical differences between normal eyes and keratoconus, independent of IOP (Intraocular Pressure) and CCT (Central Corneal Thickness), with a good correlation with Corvis ST, especially in assessing regional biomechanics.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering