Ting-Shuo Hsu, Chang-Jung Chiang, Hsuan-Wen Wang, Yu-San Chen, Chun-Li Lin
{"title":"新型椭圆套筒椎弓根螺钉增强脊柱固定稳定性的生物力学设计与验证。","authors":"Ting-Shuo Hsu, Chang-Jung Chiang, Hsuan-Wen Wang, Yu-San Chen, Chun-Li Lin","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12060668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a novel modular pedicle screw system incorporating an elliptical sleeve to conform the pedicle's elliptical cross-section and enhance fixation strength with mechanical stability. The biomechanical evaluation was conducted based on fundamental mechanics principles, followed by a finite element (FE) analysis to assess stress distribution under compressive and torsional loads. Subsequently, mechanical testing was performed to evaluate static and fatigue bending performance and in vitro biomechanical fatigue in porcine vertebrae by pull-out testing after 5000 and 100,000 cycles to assess fixation stability. The FE analysis demonstrated that the elliptical sleeve design improved bending resistance by 1.21× and torsional resistance by 1.91× compared to conventional cylindrical screws. Mechanical testing revealed greater bending/torsion stiffness and fatigue resistance, with the elliptical sleeve screw withstanding 5 million cycles at 235.4 N, compared to 175.46 N for cylindrical screws. Biomechanical pull-out testing further confirmed significantly higher retention strength after 100,000 cycles (1229.75 N vs. 867.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.0101), whereas cylindrical screws failed prematurely at 10,663 cycles due to excessive displacement (>2 mm). The elliptical sleeve pedicle screw system demonstrated enhanced fixation strength, reduced micromotion, and superior fatigue resistance, making it a promising alternative to conventional pedicle screws for improving long-term spinal fixation stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Design and Validation of a Novel Elliptical Sleeve Pedicle Screw for Enhanced Spinal Fixation Stability.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Shuo Hsu, Chang-Jung Chiang, Hsuan-Wen Wang, Yu-San Chen, Chun-Li Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12060668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a novel modular pedicle screw system incorporating an elliptical sleeve to conform the pedicle's elliptical cross-section and enhance fixation strength with mechanical stability. The biomechanical evaluation was conducted based on fundamental mechanics principles, followed by a finite element (FE) analysis to assess stress distribution under compressive and torsional loads. Subsequently, mechanical testing was performed to evaluate static and fatigue bending performance and in vitro biomechanical fatigue in porcine vertebrae by pull-out testing after 5000 and 100,000 cycles to assess fixation stability. The FE analysis demonstrated that the elliptical sleeve design improved bending resistance by 1.21× and torsional resistance by 1.91× compared to conventional cylindrical screws. Mechanical testing revealed greater bending/torsion stiffness and fatigue resistance, with the elliptical sleeve screw withstanding 5 million cycles at 235.4 N, compared to 175.46 N for cylindrical screws. Biomechanical pull-out testing further confirmed significantly higher retention strength after 100,000 cycles (1229.75 N vs. 867.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.0101), whereas cylindrical screws failed prematurely at 10,663 cycles due to excessive displacement (>2 mm). The elliptical sleeve pedicle screw system demonstrated enhanced fixation strength, reduced micromotion, and superior fatigue resistance, making it a promising alternative to conventional pedicle screws for improving long-term spinal fixation stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060668\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在开发一种新型的模块化椎弓根螺钉系统,该系统包含一个椭圆套筒,以符合椎弓根的椭圆横截面,并增强固定强度和机械稳定性。基于基本力学原理进行生物力学评估,然后进行有限元分析以评估压缩和扭转载荷下的应力分布。随后,进行力学测试,通过5000次和10万次的拔出测试来评估猪椎骨的静态和疲劳弯曲性能以及体外生物力学疲劳,以评估固定稳定性。有限元分析表明,与常规圆柱螺杆相比,椭圆螺杆的抗弯曲能力提高了1.21倍,抗扭转能力提高了1.91倍。机械测试显示,椭圆套筒螺杆在235.4 N的载荷下可承受500万次循环,而圆柱螺杆则为175.46 N,具有更高的弯曲/扭转刚度和抗疲劳性能。生物力学拔出试验进一步证实,在100,000次循环后(1229.75 N对867.83 N, p = 0.0101),柱形螺钉在10,663次循环时由于过度位移(>.2 mm)而过早失效。椭圆套筒椎弓根螺钉系统显示出增强的固定强度,减少微动和优异的抗疲劳性,使其成为传统椎弓根螺钉改善长期脊柱固定稳定性的有希望的替代方案。
Biomechanical Design and Validation of a Novel Elliptical Sleeve Pedicle Screw for Enhanced Spinal Fixation Stability.
This study aimed to develop a novel modular pedicle screw system incorporating an elliptical sleeve to conform the pedicle's elliptical cross-section and enhance fixation strength with mechanical stability. The biomechanical evaluation was conducted based on fundamental mechanics principles, followed by a finite element (FE) analysis to assess stress distribution under compressive and torsional loads. Subsequently, mechanical testing was performed to evaluate static and fatigue bending performance and in vitro biomechanical fatigue in porcine vertebrae by pull-out testing after 5000 and 100,000 cycles to assess fixation stability. The FE analysis demonstrated that the elliptical sleeve design improved bending resistance by 1.21× and torsional resistance by 1.91× compared to conventional cylindrical screws. Mechanical testing revealed greater bending/torsion stiffness and fatigue resistance, with the elliptical sleeve screw withstanding 5 million cycles at 235.4 N, compared to 175.46 N for cylindrical screws. Biomechanical pull-out testing further confirmed significantly higher retention strength after 100,000 cycles (1229.75 N vs. 867.83 N, p = 0.0101), whereas cylindrical screws failed prematurely at 10,663 cycles due to excessive displacement (>2 mm). The elliptical sleeve pedicle screw system demonstrated enhanced fixation strength, reduced micromotion, and superior fatigue resistance, making it a promising alternative to conventional pedicle screws for improving long-term spinal fixation stability.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering