Andrés Camargo, Rafael Vargas, Alexander Rincón-Rodríguez, Elena Jiménez, Martha Trujillo-Güiza
{"title":"影响哥伦比亚武装冲突受害者复原力的心理社会因素:一项定量研究","authors":"Andrés Camargo, Rafael Vargas, Alexander Rincón-Rodríguez, Elena Jiménez, Martha Trujillo-Güiza","doi":"10.3390/bs15060816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the psychosocial factors influencing resilience in Colombian victims of armed conflict, highlighting the role of personal, family, and community resources in mitigating trauma. Resilience is a dynamic process that enables individuals and communities to adapt to adversity. Given Colombia's prolonged violence and forced displacement, trauma has significantly impacted both physical and emotional health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>200 adult conflict victims were recruited through snowball sampling and completed validated scales via a secure online platform. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), the APGAR Family Scale, and the Brief Resilience Coping Scale assessed resilience, social support, and psychological well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that family support was strongly associated with higher resilience, with participants exhibiting higher family support scores (mean = 15.6, SD = 4.47) demonstrating significantly greater resilience (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, resilient coping strategies (Exp(B) = 0.772, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and higher subjective happiness (Exp(B) = 0.864, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were identified as key predictors of resilience. Significant correlations were found between resilience and mental health outcomes, with higher resilience linked to lower anxiety (ρ = -0.388, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and depression (ρ = -0.388, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Education, employment, and socioeconomic status also positively influenced resilience, with individuals with higher educational levels (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.265, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and income (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.945, <i>p</i> = 0.030) showing higher resilience scores. In contrast, alcohol consumption (Exp(B) = 0.813, <i>p</i> = 0.014) was negatively associated with resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that resilience in conflict victims is influenced by both individual and social factors. Strengthening family and community support, along with improving coping strategies, is essential for long-term recovery, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance psychosocial well-being in affected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial Factors Influencing Resilience in a Sample of Victims of Armed Conflict in Colombia: A Quantitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Camargo, Rafael Vargas, Alexander Rincón-Rodríguez, Elena Jiménez, Martha Trujillo-Güiza\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bs15060816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the psychosocial factors influencing resilience in Colombian victims of armed conflict, highlighting the role of personal, family, and community resources in mitigating trauma. Resilience is a dynamic process that enables individuals and communities to adapt to adversity. Given Colombia's prolonged violence and forced displacement, trauma has significantly impacted both physical and emotional health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>200 adult conflict victims were recruited through snowball sampling and completed validated scales via a secure online platform. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), the APGAR Family Scale, and the Brief Resilience Coping Scale assessed resilience, social support, and psychological well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that family support was strongly associated with higher resilience, with participants exhibiting higher family support scores (mean = 15.6, SD = 4.47) demonstrating significantly greater resilience (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, resilient coping strategies (Exp(B) = 0.772, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and higher subjective happiness (Exp(B) = 0.864, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were identified as key predictors of resilience. Significant correlations were found between resilience and mental health outcomes, with higher resilience linked to lower anxiety (ρ = -0.388, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and depression (ρ = -0.388, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Education, employment, and socioeconomic status also positively influenced resilience, with individuals with higher educational levels (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.265, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and income (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.945, <i>p</i> = 0.030) showing higher resilience scores. In contrast, alcohol consumption (Exp(B) = 0.813, <i>p</i> = 0.014) was negatively associated with resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that resilience in conflict victims is influenced by both individual and social factors. Strengthening family and community support, along with improving coping strategies, is essential for long-term recovery, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance psychosocial well-being in affected populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060816\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究考察了影响哥伦比亚武装冲突受害者恢复力的社会心理因素,强调了个人、家庭和社区资源在减轻创伤方面的作用。弹性是一个动态的过程,它使个人和社区能够适应逆境。鉴于哥伦比亚长期的暴力和被迫流离失所,创伤严重影响了身心健康。方法:采用滚雪球抽样的方法招募200名成年冲突受害者,并通过安全的在线平台完成有效的量表。采用康诺-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC-10)、APGAR家庭量表和简要弹性应对量表评估弹性、社会支持和心理健康。结果:研究结果表明,家庭支持与心理弹性有显著相关,家庭支持得分越高(平均= 15.6,SD = 4.47)的被试心理弹性越强(p < 0.001)。此外,弹性应对策略(Exp(B) = 0.772, p < 0.001)和较高的主观幸福感(Exp(B) = 0.864, p = 0.001)被认为是弹性的关键预测因子。心理弹性与心理健康结果之间存在显著相关性,较高的心理弹性与较低的焦虑(ρ = -0.388, p < 0.001)和抑郁(ρ = -0.388, p < 0.001)相关。教育、就业、社会经济地位对心理弹性也有正向影响,受教育程度越高(χ2 = 21.265, p = 0.006)、收入越高(χ2 = 8.945, p = 0.030)的个体心理弹性得分越高。相反,酒精消耗(Exp(B) = 0.813, p = 0.014)与恢复力呈负相关。结论:本研究表明,冲突受害者的心理弹性受到个人和社会因素的双重影响。加强家庭和社区支持,同时改进应对战略,对于长期恢复至关重要,强调需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以增强受影响人群的社会心理健康。
Psychosocial Factors Influencing Resilience in a Sample of Victims of Armed Conflict in Colombia: A Quantitative Study.
Background: This study examines the psychosocial factors influencing resilience in Colombian victims of armed conflict, highlighting the role of personal, family, and community resources in mitigating trauma. Resilience is a dynamic process that enables individuals and communities to adapt to adversity. Given Colombia's prolonged violence and forced displacement, trauma has significantly impacted both physical and emotional health.
Methods: 200 adult conflict victims were recruited through snowball sampling and completed validated scales via a secure online platform. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), the APGAR Family Scale, and the Brief Resilience Coping Scale assessed resilience, social support, and psychological well-being.
Results: Findings indicate that family support was strongly associated with higher resilience, with participants exhibiting higher family support scores (mean = 15.6, SD = 4.47) demonstrating significantly greater resilience (p < 0.001). Additionally, resilient coping strategies (Exp(B) = 0.772, p < 0.001) and higher subjective happiness (Exp(B) = 0.864, p = 0.001) were identified as key predictors of resilience. Significant correlations were found between resilience and mental health outcomes, with higher resilience linked to lower anxiety (ρ = -0.388, p < 0.001) and depression (ρ = -0.388, p < 0.001). Education, employment, and socioeconomic status also positively influenced resilience, with individuals with higher educational levels (χ2 = 21.265, p = 0.006) and income (χ2 = 8.945, p = 0.030) showing higher resilience scores. In contrast, alcohol consumption (Exp(B) = 0.813, p = 0.014) was negatively associated with resilience.
Conclusions: This study shows that resilience in conflict victims is influenced by both individual and social factors. Strengthening family and community support, along with improving coping strategies, is essential for long-term recovery, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance psychosocial well-being in affected populations.