沿海的滨鸟比内陆的更晚成熟

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Danny I. Rogers, Theunis Piersma, Clive D. T. Minton, Adrian N. Boyle, Chris J. Hassell, Ken G. Rogers, Andrew Silcocks, Jorge S. Gutiérrez
{"title":"沿海的滨鸟比内陆的更晚成熟","authors":"Danny I. Rogers,&nbsp;Theunis Piersma,&nbsp;Clive D. T. Minton,&nbsp;Adrian N. Boyle,&nbsp;Chris J. Hassell,&nbsp;Ken G. Rogers,&nbsp;Andrew Silcocks,&nbsp;Jorge S. Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71679","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coastal Shorebirds Delay Maturity More Than Inland Ones\",\"authors\":\"Danny I. Rogers,&nbsp;Theunis Piersma,&nbsp;Clive D. T. Minton,&nbsp;Adrian N. Boyle,&nbsp;Chris J. Hassell,&nbsp;Ken G. Rogers,&nbsp;Andrew Silcocks,&nbsp;Jorge S. Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推迟初次繁殖的年龄将降低终生的生殖产出,除非通过增加繁殖力或存活率来补偿。然而,在许多迁徙的滨鸟物种(Charadriiformes)中,个体将第一次返回繁殖地的迁徙推迟到几岁。利用非繁殖区滨鸟的非繁殖期和繁殖期的数据,再捕获和长期的带带研究,我们评估了37种迁移到澳大利亚非繁殖地的滨鸟的首次返回迁徙年龄(作为成熟的衡量标准)。本文以沿海湿地和内陆湿地为例,对非繁殖期湿地的成熟度与生境利用之间的关系进行了比较分析。在控制纬度和系统发育协变量后,我们发现体型与首次回迁年龄呈正相关。然而,与使用的非繁殖栖息地的类型仍然有更强的关系。沿海滨鸟比在内陆无潮湿地度过非繁殖期的滨鸟早熟。这一发现扩展了先前确定的沿海和内陆滨鸟之间的生态和生理差异,并引发了关于栖息地对比所体现的环境特征的问题。我们认为,复杂的潮汐动态和猎物的差异使得个体成为有能力的沿海(而不是内陆淡水)觅食者变得更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coastal Shorebirds Delay Maturity More Than Inland Ones

Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信