Danny I. Rogers, Theunis Piersma, Clive D. T. Minton, Adrian N. Boyle, Chris J. Hassell, Ken G. Rogers, Andrew Silcocks, Jorge S. Gutiérrez
{"title":"沿海的滨鸟比内陆的更晚成熟","authors":"Danny I. Rogers, Theunis Piersma, Clive D. T. Minton, Adrian N. Boyle, Chris J. Hassell, Ken G. Rogers, Andrew Silcocks, Jorge S. Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71679","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coastal Shorebirds Delay Maturity More Than Inland Ones\",\"authors\":\"Danny I. Rogers, Theunis Piersma, Clive D. T. Minton, Adrian N. Boyle, Chris J. Hassell, Ken G. Rogers, Andrew Silcocks, Jorge S. Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coastal Shorebirds Delay Maturity More Than Inland Ones
Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.