Ali Momen, Ali Taherkhani, Kosar Shahabi, Roohollah Rostami
{"title":"揭示住宅建筑和学校中乙苯暴露的全面系统综述","authors":"Ali Momen, Ali Taherkhani, Kosar Shahabi, Roohollah Rostami","doi":"10.1155/ina/8893958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the contemporary context of lifestyles, where individuals typically spend around 90% of their lifetimes indoors, indoor air quality becomes a crucial concern with implications for human health. This research examines ethylbenzene concentration in residential and educational buildings, evaluating associated risks. Extensive searches of databases such as Science Direct, PubMed, and Springer were conducted, encompassing data from inception to April 13<sup>th</sup>, 2023, focusing on English-language sources. Search terms contained “BTEX,” “Indoor,” “Cigarette,” “Waterpipe,” “Shisha,” “Hookah,” “Tobacco,” and “ETS”. Thirty-one studies were deemed eligible for analysis. Time-series analysis does not show significant trends for ethylbenzene in both indoor and outdoor environments over years. However, ethylbenzene concentrations in residential buildings generally exceeded those in schools (7.49 ± 9.86 vs. 4.67 ± 7.81 <i> μ</i>g/m<sup>3</sup>). Moreover, smoking within residential buildings correlated with higher ethylbenzene concentrations compared to nonsmoking environments (17.75 ± 18.96 vs. 7.16 ± 7.79 <i> μ</i>g/m<sup>3</sup>). Additionally, indoor ethylbenzene concentrations surpassed outdoor concentrations. The calculated cancer risk for all studies related to residential buildings, across genders and age groups, and schools in Group 3, exceeded the established permissible limit (i.e., 10<sup>−6</sup>). Conversely, the calculated hazard quotient for all studies remained below the permissible limit (i.e., 1).</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/8893958","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unmasking Ethylbenzene Exposure in Residential Buildings and Schools With a Comprehensive Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ali Momen, Ali Taherkhani, Kosar Shahabi, Roohollah Rostami\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ina/8893958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the contemporary context of lifestyles, where individuals typically spend around 90% of their lifetimes indoors, indoor air quality becomes a crucial concern with implications for human health. This research examines ethylbenzene concentration in residential and educational buildings, evaluating associated risks. Extensive searches of databases such as Science Direct, PubMed, and Springer were conducted, encompassing data from inception to April 13<sup>th</sup>, 2023, focusing on English-language sources. Search terms contained “BTEX,” “Indoor,” “Cigarette,” “Waterpipe,” “Shisha,” “Hookah,” “Tobacco,” and “ETS”. Thirty-one studies were deemed eligible for analysis. Time-series analysis does not show significant trends for ethylbenzene in both indoor and outdoor environments over years. However, ethylbenzene concentrations in residential buildings generally exceeded those in schools (7.49 ± 9.86 vs. 4.67 ± 7.81 <i> μ</i>g/m<sup>3</sup>). Moreover, smoking within residential buildings correlated with higher ethylbenzene concentrations compared to nonsmoking environments (17.75 ± 18.96 vs. 7.16 ± 7.79 <i> μ</i>g/m<sup>3</sup>). Additionally, indoor ethylbenzene concentrations surpassed outdoor concentrations. The calculated cancer risk for all studies related to residential buildings, across genders and age groups, and schools in Group 3, exceeded the established permissible limit (i.e., 10<sup>−6</sup>). Conversely, the calculated hazard quotient for all studies remained below the permissible limit (i.e., 1).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor air\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/8893958\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/8893958\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/8893958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在当代生活方式的背景下,人们通常在室内度过一生中约90%的时间,室内空气质量成为影响人类健康的关键问题。本研究考察了住宅和教育建筑中的乙苯浓度,评估了相关风险。对Science Direct、PubMed和施普林格等数据库进行了广泛的搜索,涵盖了从成立到2023年4月13日的数据,重点是英语来源。搜索词包括“BTEX”、“室内”、“香烟”、“水管”、“水烟”、“水烟”、“烟草”和“ETS”。31项研究被认为有资格进行分析。时间序列分析没有显示出室内和室外环境中乙苯多年来的显著趋势。住宅楼乙苯浓度普遍高于学校(7.49±9.86 vs 4.67±7.81)。此外,与非吸烟环境相比,居住建筑内吸烟与更高的乙苯浓度相关(17.75±18.96比7.16±7.79 μg/m3)。此外,室内乙苯浓度超过室外浓度。与住宅楼有关的所有研究,不分性别和年龄组,以及第三组学校的计算癌症风险都超过了既定的允许限度(即10 - 6)。相反,所有研究计算出的危险商数仍低于允许限度(即1)。
Unmasking Ethylbenzene Exposure in Residential Buildings and Schools With a Comprehensive Systematic Review
In the contemporary context of lifestyles, where individuals typically spend around 90% of their lifetimes indoors, indoor air quality becomes a crucial concern with implications for human health. This research examines ethylbenzene concentration in residential and educational buildings, evaluating associated risks. Extensive searches of databases such as Science Direct, PubMed, and Springer were conducted, encompassing data from inception to April 13th, 2023, focusing on English-language sources. Search terms contained “BTEX,” “Indoor,” “Cigarette,” “Waterpipe,” “Shisha,” “Hookah,” “Tobacco,” and “ETS”. Thirty-one studies were deemed eligible for analysis. Time-series analysis does not show significant trends for ethylbenzene in both indoor and outdoor environments over years. However, ethylbenzene concentrations in residential buildings generally exceeded those in schools (7.49 ± 9.86 vs. 4.67 ± 7.81 μg/m3). Moreover, smoking within residential buildings correlated with higher ethylbenzene concentrations compared to nonsmoking environments (17.75 ± 18.96 vs. 7.16 ± 7.79 μg/m3). Additionally, indoor ethylbenzene concentrations surpassed outdoor concentrations. The calculated cancer risk for all studies related to residential buildings, across genders and age groups, and schools in Group 3, exceeded the established permissible limit (i.e., 10−6). Conversely, the calculated hazard quotient for all studies remained below the permissible limit (i.e., 1).
期刊介绍:
The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health.
Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques.
The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.