ABC方法在巴西不同CagA状态和亚型幽门螺杆菌感染中胃癌风险分层的验证

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1002/cam4.71016
Luis Masuo Maruta, Asuka Furukawa, Heinrich Bender Kohnert Seidler, Aloisio Felipe-Silva, Keisuke Uchida, Daisuke Kobayashi, Kurara Yamamoto, Junko Minami, Masaki Sekine, Minako Takagi, Renato Takayuki Hassegawa, Eduardo Koji Marchi Ogawa, Rodrigo Barbosa Villaça, Tecio de Araujo Couto, Jorge Alberto Capra Biasuz, Edmar Tafner, Ana Luiza Werneck-Silva, Simone Perez Pilli, José Guilherme Nogueira da Silva, Leonard Medeiros da Silva, Ricardo Ambrosio Fock, Chinatsu Ogura, Yumi Mizuguchi, Keiko Miura, Kouhei Yamamoto, Yoshinobu Eishi, Kenichi Ohashi
{"title":"ABC方法在巴西不同CagA状态和亚型幽门螺杆菌感染中胃癌风险分层的验证","authors":"Luis Masuo Maruta,&nbsp;Asuka Furukawa,&nbsp;Heinrich Bender Kohnert Seidler,&nbsp;Aloisio Felipe-Silva,&nbsp;Keisuke Uchida,&nbsp;Daisuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kurara Yamamoto,&nbsp;Junko Minami,&nbsp;Masaki Sekine,&nbsp;Minako Takagi,&nbsp;Renato Takayuki Hassegawa,&nbsp;Eduardo Koji Marchi Ogawa,&nbsp;Rodrigo Barbosa Villaça,&nbsp;Tecio de Araujo Couto,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Capra Biasuz,&nbsp;Edmar Tafner,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Werneck-Silva,&nbsp;Simone Perez Pilli,&nbsp;José Guilherme Nogueira da Silva,&nbsp;Leonard Medeiros da Silva,&nbsp;Ricardo Ambrosio Fock,&nbsp;Chinatsu Ogura,&nbsp;Yumi Mizuguchi,&nbsp;Keiko Miura,&nbsp;Kouhei Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Eishi,&nbsp;Kenichi Ohashi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Gastric cancer survival rates vary across countries due to differences in access to early diagnostic testing and healthcare quality. Endoscopy, though accurate, is not feasible for mass screening. The ABC method, which combines serum <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (Hp) antibody and pepsinogen tests, has shown promise for gastric cancer risk stratification in Japan. However, its applicability in populations with diverse CagA status and subtypes remains uncertain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective study in Brazil evaluated the performance of the ABC method in an endoscopy-referred cohort with a heterogeneous distribution of Hp CagA status and subtypes. A recently validated immunohistochemical method was applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy samples to assess Hp infection, CagA expression, and CagA subtypes. Gastric pathology was evaluated using the updated Sydney System and OLGA/OLGIM staging and correlated with serum Hp antibody and pepsinogen levels in 586 patients, including 122 Japanese Brazilians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Immunohistochemistry achieved a 98% success rate (577/586). The prevalence of Hp infection was 48%, with Western-type CagA(+) (26%) and CagA(−) (18%) strains predominating. East Asian-type CagA(+) strains (4%) were observed primarily among Japanese Brazilians, particularly in second-generation individuals. Gastric pathology and serum markers differed significantly across CagA status and subtypes. Despite these differences, the ABC method's negative predictive values (NPVs) across all groups other than Group A (negative for both tests) remained high (97%/97% or 98%/100% for detecting OLGA/OLGIM stages ≥ II or ≥ III, and 94%/98% or 99%/100% for detecting antrum/corpus inflammation scores ≥ 2 or 3, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings demonstrate the clinical relevance of CagA diversity for gastric cancer risk assessment. Although limited to an endoscopy-referred cohort, the ABC method reliably identified low-risk individuals (Group A) and may help reduce unnecessary endoscopies in screening programs, regardless of CagA status and subtypes. Broader, population-based studies are needed to validate its generalizability and optimize its implementation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the ABC Method for Gastric Cancer Risk Stratification Across Helicobacter pylori Infections With Diverse CagA Status and Subtypes in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Luis Masuo Maruta,&nbsp;Asuka Furukawa,&nbsp;Heinrich Bender Kohnert Seidler,&nbsp;Aloisio Felipe-Silva,&nbsp;Keisuke Uchida,&nbsp;Daisuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kurara Yamamoto,&nbsp;Junko Minami,&nbsp;Masaki Sekine,&nbsp;Minako Takagi,&nbsp;Renato Takayuki Hassegawa,&nbsp;Eduardo Koji Marchi Ogawa,&nbsp;Rodrigo Barbosa Villaça,&nbsp;Tecio de Araujo Couto,&nbsp;Jorge Alberto Capra Biasuz,&nbsp;Edmar Tafner,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Werneck-Silva,&nbsp;Simone Perez Pilli,&nbsp;José Guilherme Nogueira da Silva,&nbsp;Leonard Medeiros da Silva,&nbsp;Ricardo Ambrosio Fock,&nbsp;Chinatsu Ogura,&nbsp;Yumi Mizuguchi,&nbsp;Keiko Miura,&nbsp;Kouhei Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Eishi,&nbsp;Kenichi Ohashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Gastric cancer survival rates vary across countries due to differences in access to early diagnostic testing and healthcare quality. Endoscopy, though accurate, is not feasible for mass screening. The ABC method, which combines serum <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (Hp) antibody and pepsinogen tests, has shown promise for gastric cancer risk stratification in Japan. However, its applicability in populations with diverse CagA status and subtypes remains uncertain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective study in Brazil evaluated the performance of the ABC method in an endoscopy-referred cohort with a heterogeneous distribution of Hp CagA status and subtypes. A recently validated immunohistochemical method was applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy samples to assess Hp infection, CagA expression, and CagA subtypes. Gastric pathology was evaluated using the updated Sydney System and OLGA/OLGIM staging and correlated with serum Hp antibody and pepsinogen levels in 586 patients, including 122 Japanese Brazilians.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Immunohistochemistry achieved a 98% success rate (577/586). The prevalence of Hp infection was 48%, with Western-type CagA(+) (26%) and CagA(−) (18%) strains predominating. East Asian-type CagA(+) strains (4%) were observed primarily among Japanese Brazilians, particularly in second-generation individuals. Gastric pathology and serum markers differed significantly across CagA status and subtypes. Despite these differences, the ABC method's negative predictive values (NPVs) across all groups other than Group A (negative for both tests) remained high (97%/97% or 98%/100% for detecting OLGA/OLGIM stages ≥ II or ≥ III, and 94%/98% or 99%/100% for detecting antrum/corpus inflammation scores ≥ 2 or 3, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings demonstrate the clinical relevance of CagA diversity for gastric cancer risk assessment. Although limited to an endoscopy-referred cohort, the ABC method reliably identified low-risk individuals (Group A) and may help reduce unnecessary endoscopies in screening programs, regardless of CagA status and subtypes. Broader, population-based studies are needed to validate its generalizability and optimize its implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胃癌存活率因各国获得早期诊断检测和医疗保健质量的差异而异。内窥镜检查虽然准确,但不适用于大规模筛查。ABC方法结合了血清幽门螺杆菌抗体和胃蛋白酶原测试,在日本显示出胃癌风险分层的希望。然而,其在不同CagA状态和亚型人群中的适用性仍不确定。材料和方法这项在巴西进行的前瞻性研究评估了ABC方法在内窥镜下涉及的具有异质分布的Hp CagA状态和亚型的队列中的性能。最近验证的免疫组织化学方法应用于福尔马林固定石蜡包埋胃活检样本,以评估Hp感染,CagA表达和CagA亚型。采用更新的Sydney系统和OLGA/OLGIM分期对586例患者的胃病理进行评估,并与血清Hp抗体和胃蛋白酶原水平相关,其中包括122名日本巴西人。结果免疫组化成功率为98%(577/586)。Hp感染率为48%,以Western-type CagA(+)(26%)和CagA(−)(18%)菌株为主。东亚型CagA(+)菌株(4%)主要见于日裔巴西人,特别是第二代个体。胃病理和血清标志物在不同的CagA状态和亚型之间存在显著差异。尽管存在这些差异,ABC方法的阴性预测值(npv)在除A组外的所有组中(两项检测均为阴性)仍然很高(检测OLGA/OLGIM≥II或≥III期为97%/97%或98%/100%,检测上腔/体炎症评分≥2或3期分别为94%/98%或99%/100%)。结论CagA多样性在胃癌风险评估中的临床意义。尽管仅限于内窥镜相关队列,但ABC方法可靠地识别出低风险个体(A组),并可能有助于减少筛查计划中不必要的内窥镜检查,无论CagA状态和亚型如何。需要更广泛的、基于人群的研究来验证其普遍性并优化其实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the ABC Method for Gastric Cancer Risk Stratification Across Helicobacter pylori Infections With Diverse CagA Status and Subtypes in Brazil

Validation of the ABC Method for Gastric Cancer Risk Stratification Across Helicobacter pylori Infections With Diverse CagA Status and Subtypes in Brazil

Background

Gastric cancer survival rates vary across countries due to differences in access to early diagnostic testing and healthcare quality. Endoscopy, though accurate, is not feasible for mass screening. The ABC method, which combines serum Helicobacter pylori (Hp) antibody and pepsinogen tests, has shown promise for gastric cancer risk stratification in Japan. However, its applicability in populations with diverse CagA status and subtypes remains uncertain.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study in Brazil evaluated the performance of the ABC method in an endoscopy-referred cohort with a heterogeneous distribution of Hp CagA status and subtypes. A recently validated immunohistochemical method was applied to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy samples to assess Hp infection, CagA expression, and CagA subtypes. Gastric pathology was evaluated using the updated Sydney System and OLGA/OLGIM staging and correlated with serum Hp antibody and pepsinogen levels in 586 patients, including 122 Japanese Brazilians.

Results

Immunohistochemistry achieved a 98% success rate (577/586). The prevalence of Hp infection was 48%, with Western-type CagA(+) (26%) and CagA(−) (18%) strains predominating. East Asian-type CagA(+) strains (4%) were observed primarily among Japanese Brazilians, particularly in second-generation individuals. Gastric pathology and serum markers differed significantly across CagA status and subtypes. Despite these differences, the ABC method's negative predictive values (NPVs) across all groups other than Group A (negative for both tests) remained high (97%/97% or 98%/100% for detecting OLGA/OLGIM stages ≥ II or ≥ III, and 94%/98% or 99%/100% for detecting antrum/corpus inflammation scores ≥ 2 or 3, respectively).

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the clinical relevance of CagA diversity for gastric cancer risk assessment. Although limited to an endoscopy-referred cohort, the ABC method reliably identified low-risk individuals (Group A) and may help reduce unnecessary endoscopies in screening programs, regardless of CagA status and subtypes. Broader, population-based studies are needed to validate its generalizability and optimize its implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信