Neophytos Georgiou, Ryan P. Balzan, Lucy Butler, Natasha van Antwerpen, Toby Prike, Paul Delfabbro
{"title":"科学推理干预对减少网络阴谋信念和错误信息参与的有效性:基于(错误)信息博弈的研究","authors":"Neophytos Georgiou, Ryan P. Balzan, Lucy Butler, Natasha van Antwerpen, Toby Prike, Paul Delfabbro","doi":"10.1002/acp.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increased perceived threat of conspiracy theories (CTs) and misinformation has led to research on strategies to reduce their spread. One method is to encourage stronger critical scientific appraisal skills, known as the scientific reasoning intervention (SRI). This study examined whether the SRI could reduce CT endorsement and engagement with misinformation content with targeted qualities (i.e., that do not overlap with CTs) in an online context through a simulated social media platform. After completing baseline measures of CT endorsement and misinformation engagement, 184 participants were randomly allocated to the SRI or control condition. A repeated measures analysis found people exposed to the SRI showed a lower endorsement of CT beliefs and were less likely to positively engage (i.e., like/share) with false posts compared with the control group. The findings suggest that the SRI can encourage some small reductions in CT endorsement and online engagement with misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of the Scientific Reasoning Intervention on Reducing Online Conspiracy Beliefs and Misinformation Engagement: A Study Using the (Mis)Information Game\",\"authors\":\"Neophytos Georgiou, Ryan P. Balzan, Lucy Butler, Natasha van Antwerpen, Toby Prike, Paul Delfabbro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acp.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increased perceived threat of conspiracy theories (CTs) and misinformation has led to research on strategies to reduce their spread. One method is to encourage stronger critical scientific appraisal skills, known as the scientific reasoning intervention (SRI). This study examined whether the SRI could reduce CT endorsement and engagement with misinformation content with targeted qualities (i.e., that do not overlap with CTs) in an online context through a simulated social media platform. After completing baseline measures of CT endorsement and misinformation engagement, 184 participants were randomly allocated to the SRI or control condition. A repeated measures analysis found people exposed to the SRI showed a lower endorsement of CT beliefs and were less likely to positively engage (i.e., like/share) with false posts compared with the control group. The findings suggest that the SRI can encourage some small reductions in CT endorsement and online engagement with misinformation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.70069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of the Scientific Reasoning Intervention on Reducing Online Conspiracy Beliefs and Misinformation Engagement: A Study Using the (Mis)Information Game
The increased perceived threat of conspiracy theories (CTs) and misinformation has led to research on strategies to reduce their spread. One method is to encourage stronger critical scientific appraisal skills, known as the scientific reasoning intervention (SRI). This study examined whether the SRI could reduce CT endorsement and engagement with misinformation content with targeted qualities (i.e., that do not overlap with CTs) in an online context through a simulated social media platform. After completing baseline measures of CT endorsement and misinformation engagement, 184 participants were randomly allocated to the SRI or control condition. A repeated measures analysis found people exposed to the SRI showed a lower endorsement of CT beliefs and were less likely to positively engage (i.e., like/share) with false posts compared with the control group. The findings suggest that the SRI can encourage some small reductions in CT endorsement and online engagement with misinformation.
期刊介绍:
Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.