结盟的二律背反:阿拉伯联合酋长国和美国

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Fred H. Lawson, Matteo Legrenzi
{"title":"结盟的二律背反:阿拉伯联合酋长国和美国","authors":"Fred H. Lawson,&nbsp;Matteo Legrenzi","doi":"10.1111/mepo.12795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past three decades, the United Arab Emirates has forged a sturdy bilateral security alignment with the United States. It has also pursued foreign policies that conflict with US interests in the Gulf and the broader Middle East. This contradiction is usually attributed to a hedging strategy. However, a more accurate analysis indicates that this reflects the peculiar type of alignment that exists between the two countries: a dyadic protectorate. Protectorates exhibit a tendency toward obsolescence, which gives the protected state both the incentive and the capacity to assert its self-interests. Protectors have little incentive to block such activism, partly because countermeasures are costly and partly because they tend to be counterproductive. Recent trends in UAE-US relations evidence the willingness and ability of a protected state to push the limits of a dyadic protectorate, but only after the alignment obsolesces.</p>","PeriodicalId":46060,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Policy","volume":"32 2","pages":"134-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12795","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antinomies of Alignment Redux: The United Arab Emirates and the United States\",\"authors\":\"Fred H. Lawson,&nbsp;Matteo Legrenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mepo.12795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past three decades, the United Arab Emirates has forged a sturdy bilateral security alignment with the United States. It has also pursued foreign policies that conflict with US interests in the Gulf and the broader Middle East. This contradiction is usually attributed to a hedging strategy. However, a more accurate analysis indicates that this reflects the peculiar type of alignment that exists between the two countries: a dyadic protectorate. Protectorates exhibit a tendency toward obsolescence, which gives the protected state both the incentive and the capacity to assert its self-interests. Protectors have little incentive to block such activism, partly because countermeasures are costly and partly because they tend to be counterproductive. Recent trends in UAE-US relations evidence the willingness and ability of a protected state to push the limits of a dyadic protectorate, but only after the alignment obsolesces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Policy\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"134-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12795\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mepo.12795\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mepo.12795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的30年里,阿联酋与美国建立了牢固的双边安全同盟。它所奉行的外交政策也与美国在海湾地区和更广泛的中东地区的利益相冲突。这种矛盾通常归因于对冲策略。然而,更准确的分析表明,这反映了两国之间存在的一种特殊结盟:双重保护国。受保护国家表现出一种过时的趋势,这给了受保护国家维护自身利益的动力和能力。保护主义者几乎没有动力阻止这种激进主义,部分原因是反制措施成本高昂,部分原因是它们往往适得其反。最近阿联酋与美国关系的趋势表明,一个受保护国有意愿也有能力挑战一个二元保护国的极限,但只有在结盟失效之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antinomies of Alignment Redux: The United Arab Emirates and the United States

Over the past three decades, the United Arab Emirates has forged a sturdy bilateral security alignment with the United States. It has also pursued foreign policies that conflict with US interests in the Gulf and the broader Middle East. This contradiction is usually attributed to a hedging strategy. However, a more accurate analysis indicates that this reflects the peculiar type of alignment that exists between the two countries: a dyadic protectorate. Protectorates exhibit a tendency toward obsolescence, which gives the protected state both the incentive and the capacity to assert its self-interests. Protectors have little incentive to block such activism, partly because countermeasures are costly and partly because they tend to be counterproductive. Recent trends in UAE-US relations evidence the willingness and ability of a protected state to push the limits of a dyadic protectorate, but only after the alignment obsolesces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Policy
Middle East Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The most frequently cited journal on the Middle East region in the field of international affairs, Middle East Policy has been engaging thoughtful minds for more than 25 years. Since its inception in 1982, the journal has been recognized as a valuable addition to the Washington-based policy discussion. Middle East Policy provides an influential forum for a wide range of views on U.S. interests in the region and the value of the policies that are supposed to promote them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信