瓣膜狭窄及瓣膜置换术对心脏横波弹性成像波形特性的影响

IF 2.9
Laurine Wouters;Lennert Minten;Marta Orlowska;Annette Caenen;Jürgen Duchenne;Jens-Uwe Voigt;Jan D’Hooge
{"title":"瓣膜狭窄及瓣膜置换术对心脏横波弹性成像波形特性的影响","authors":"Laurine Wouters;Lennert Minten;Marta Orlowska;Annette Caenen;Jürgen Duchenne;Jens-Uwe Voigt;Jan D’Hooge","doi":"10.1109/OJUFFC.2025.3577142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac shear wave elastography (SWE) is a non-invasive technique to assess myocardial stiffness, based on the speed of waves that travel through the heart after valve closure. The wave physics underlying natural SWE remains incompletely understood. Therefore, we investigated the impact of wave excitation sources on 3 wave propagation aspects – wave amplitude (determined as wave acceleration magnitude), temporal wave width and speed. SWE was applied to 17 patients with aortic stenosis (AS), 13 AS patients that underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), 10 AS patients that underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV). Absolute wave acceleration was lower in AS, TAVI and AVR patients compared to HV (1.5±0.60 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.001; 1.6±0.78 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.010; 1.7±0.66 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.015). Wave acceleration amplitude (measured as negative peak acceleration of the tissue) correlated with wave speed (r=0.388; p=0.003), implying that absolute wave acceleration is smaller in a stiffer heart. Subgroup analysis showed that the correlation between wave peak acceleration and speed is less steep in AS patients vs. HV (slopes: 0.23 vs 0.47 s). This implies that stenotic valves generate a wave with a lower acceleration magnitude compared to native valves. Further, temporal wave width was lower in TAVI patients vs. HV (8.7±2.3 vs 12.5±3.0 ms; p=0.002) and there was no difference in wave speed after aortic valve closure (AVC) between the groups. To conclude, wave acceleration magnitude and width offer additional insights into SWE physics next to wave speed and should be verified in a larger cohort.","PeriodicalId":73301,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"5 ","pages":"114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11027079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Valve Stenosis and Replacement on Wave Characteristics in Cardiac Shear Wave Elastography\",\"authors\":\"Laurine Wouters;Lennert Minten;Marta Orlowska;Annette Caenen;Jürgen Duchenne;Jens-Uwe Voigt;Jan D’Hooge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJUFFC.2025.3577142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiac shear wave elastography (SWE) is a non-invasive technique to assess myocardial stiffness, based on the speed of waves that travel through the heart after valve closure. The wave physics underlying natural SWE remains incompletely understood. Therefore, we investigated the impact of wave excitation sources on 3 wave propagation aspects – wave amplitude (determined as wave acceleration magnitude), temporal wave width and speed. SWE was applied to 17 patients with aortic stenosis (AS), 13 AS patients that underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), 10 AS patients that underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV). Absolute wave acceleration was lower in AS, TAVI and AVR patients compared to HV (1.5±0.60 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.001; 1.6±0.78 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.010; 1.7±0.66 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.015). Wave acceleration amplitude (measured as negative peak acceleration of the tissue) correlated with wave speed (r=0.388; p=0.003), implying that absolute wave acceleration is smaller in a stiffer heart. Subgroup analysis showed that the correlation between wave peak acceleration and speed is less steep in AS patients vs. HV (slopes: 0.23 vs 0.47 s). This implies that stenotic valves generate a wave with a lower acceleration magnitude compared to native valves. Further, temporal wave width was lower in TAVI patients vs. HV (8.7±2.3 vs 12.5±3.0 ms; p=0.002) and there was no difference in wave speed after aortic valve closure (AVC) between the groups. To conclude, wave acceleration magnitude and width offer additional insights into SWE physics next to wave speed and should be verified in a larger cohort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"114-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11027079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11027079/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11027079/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏剪切波弹性成像(SWE)是一种评估心肌硬度的无创技术,基于瓣膜关闭后穿过心脏的波的速度。自然SWE背后的波动物理仍未完全被理解。因此,我们研究了波激励源对波传播3个方面的影响——波幅(以波加速度大小确定)、时间波宽度和速度。SWE应用于17例主动脉瓣狭窄患者(AS), 13例经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的AS患者,10例手术主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的AS患者和18例年龄匹配的健康志愿者(HV)。AS、TAVI和AVR患者的绝对波加速度较HV患者低(1.5±0.60 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2;p = 0.001;1.6±0.78 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2;p = 0.010;1.7±0.66 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2;p = 0.015)。波加速度幅值(以组织负峰值加速度测量)与波速相关(r=0.388;P =0.003),这意味着在较硬的心脏中,绝对波加速度较小。亚组分析显示,AS患者与HV患者相比,波峰加速度和速度之间的相关性不那么陡峭(斜率:0.23 vs 0.47 s)。这意味着狭窄瓣膜产生的波与原生瓣膜相比具有较低的加速度量级。此外,TAVI患者的颞波宽度低于HV患者(8.7±2.3 vs 12.5±3.0 ms);p=0.002),两组间主动脉瓣关闭(AVC)后的波速无差异。综上所述,波加速度的大小和宽度除了波速之外,还提供了对SWE物理的进一步了解,应该在更大的队列中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Valve Stenosis and Replacement on Wave Characteristics in Cardiac Shear Wave Elastography
Cardiac shear wave elastography (SWE) is a non-invasive technique to assess myocardial stiffness, based on the speed of waves that travel through the heart after valve closure. The wave physics underlying natural SWE remains incompletely understood. Therefore, we investigated the impact of wave excitation sources on 3 wave propagation aspects – wave amplitude (determined as wave acceleration magnitude), temporal wave width and speed. SWE was applied to 17 patients with aortic stenosis (AS), 13 AS patients that underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), 10 AS patients that underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV). Absolute wave acceleration was lower in AS, TAVI and AVR patients compared to HV (1.5±0.60 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.001; 1.6±0.78 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.010; 1.7±0.66 vs 2.8±1.1 m/s2; p=0.015). Wave acceleration amplitude (measured as negative peak acceleration of the tissue) correlated with wave speed (r=0.388; p=0.003), implying that absolute wave acceleration is smaller in a stiffer heart. Subgroup analysis showed that the correlation between wave peak acceleration and speed is less steep in AS patients vs. HV (slopes: 0.23 vs 0.47 s). This implies that stenotic valves generate a wave with a lower acceleration magnitude compared to native valves. Further, temporal wave width was lower in TAVI patients vs. HV (8.7±2.3 vs 12.5±3.0 ms; p=0.002) and there was no difference in wave speed after aortic valve closure (AVC) between the groups. To conclude, wave acceleration magnitude and width offer additional insights into SWE physics next to wave speed and should be verified in a larger cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信