{"title":"水流更清,辉光更低:水质改善中的水价值重估","authors":"Xun Fan , Mengdi Liu , Bing Zhang , Qianqian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an implicit assumption in most regulatory analyses that baseline environmental conditions are static. In developing countries, rapid environmental improvements resulting from regulation can amplify the biases created by this assumption. This paper is the first attempt to link water quality as a baseline environmental condition with the marginal value of clean water. Leveraging positive shocks to water quality through the dissemination of water quality information to governments in an experiment in China, this paper estimates the effect of water quality on willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water. With an instrumental variable (IV) model, we find that a one-unit increase in water quality index would lead to an approximate 34.2 % decrease in WTP for clean water. Our findings highlight the diminishing marginal value of clean water in developing countries with tightening regulations and rapidly improving water quality. This suggests that overlooking the relationship between water quality and marginal value of clean water may lead to an overestimation of policy benefits. In addition, we provide suggestive evidence that our findings of a negative WTP effect are likely attributable to the reduction in perceived water quality risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 108056"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clearer flow, lower glow: Reassessing water valuation amid water quality improvement\",\"authors\":\"Xun Fan , Mengdi Liu , Bing Zhang , Qianqian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is an implicit assumption in most regulatory analyses that baseline environmental conditions are static. In developing countries, rapid environmental improvements resulting from regulation can amplify the biases created by this assumption. This paper is the first attempt to link water quality as a baseline environmental condition with the marginal value of clean water. Leveraging positive shocks to water quality through the dissemination of water quality information to governments in an experiment in China, this paper estimates the effect of water quality on willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water. With an instrumental variable (IV) model, we find that a one-unit increase in water quality index would lead to an approximate 34.2 % decrease in WTP for clean water. Our findings highlight the diminishing marginal value of clean water in developing countries with tightening regulations and rapidly improving water quality. This suggests that overlooking the relationship between water quality and marginal value of clean water may lead to an overestimation of policy benefits. In addition, we provide suggestive evidence that our findings of a negative WTP effect are likely attributable to the reduction in perceived water quality risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clearer flow, lower glow: Reassessing water valuation amid water quality improvement
There is an implicit assumption in most regulatory analyses that baseline environmental conditions are static. In developing countries, rapid environmental improvements resulting from regulation can amplify the biases created by this assumption. This paper is the first attempt to link water quality as a baseline environmental condition with the marginal value of clean water. Leveraging positive shocks to water quality through the dissemination of water quality information to governments in an experiment in China, this paper estimates the effect of water quality on willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water. With an instrumental variable (IV) model, we find that a one-unit increase in water quality index would lead to an approximate 34.2 % decrease in WTP for clean water. Our findings highlight the diminishing marginal value of clean water in developing countries with tightening regulations and rapidly improving water quality. This suggests that overlooking the relationship between water quality and marginal value of clean water may lead to an overestimation of policy benefits. In addition, we provide suggestive evidence that our findings of a negative WTP effect are likely attributable to the reduction in perceived water quality risks.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.