Senepol肉牛饲料效率、胴体和肉质性状的遗传参数和单步基因组预测

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Clélia Soares de Assis , Fernando dos Santos Magaço , José António Fernandes Júnior , Marcelo Neves Ribas , Gilberto Romeiro de Oliveira Menezes , Claudiana de Fátima Miranda , Idalmo Garcia Pereira
{"title":"Senepol肉牛饲料效率、胴体和肉质性状的遗传参数和单步基因组预测","authors":"Clélia Soares de Assis ,&nbsp;Fernando dos Santos Magaço ,&nbsp;José António Fernandes Júnior ,&nbsp;Marcelo Neves Ribas ,&nbsp;Gilberto Romeiro de Oliveira Menezes ,&nbsp;Claudiana de Fátima Miranda ,&nbsp;Idalmo Garcia Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improving feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality is crucial for sustainable beef production and meeting consumer demand. This study aimed to estimate (co)variance components and genetic parameters using pedigree and genomic information and assessed the impact of genomic data on genetic prediction for feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Senepol beef cattle. Phenotypic data were available from 4194 animals for residual feed intake (RFI), 4071 for dry matter intake (DMI), 11,411 for rib eye area (REA), 11,165 for subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), 9563 for marbling (MAR). Additionally, 4419 animals were genotyped. Genetic evaluations were performed using the traditional pedigree-based BLUP and the single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) via Bayesian inference, single-trait and multi-trait animal models. Predictive ability was validated through linear regression (LR) analysis, excluding 50 % of the phenotypic data. Heritability estimates were consistent across methods, ranging from 0.094 for RFI to 0.25 for REA. A positive genetic correlation (0.56) was observed between RFI and DMI, indicating that selection for lower RFI reduces DMI. However, an unfavorable positive correlation was observed between RFI and MAR (BLUP: 0.447; ssGBLUP: 0.33), suggesting that the intense selection for RFI alone could reduce marbling in the evaluated population. Genetic correlations were null between RFI-SFT and RFI-REA. Notably, ssGBLUP generally resulted in slightly reduced genetic correlation estimates for some traits. Overrall, ssGBLUP consistently yielded higher prediction accuracy, with an average increase of 16.20 % across traits compared to BLUP. These results underscore that incorporating genomic data significantly enhances genetic evaluation in Senepol beef cattle, enabling more accurate selection decisions for improved residual feed intake and meat quality traits in breeding programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"299 ","pages":"Article 105753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic parameters and single-step genomic predictions for feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Senepol beef cattle\",\"authors\":\"Clélia Soares de Assis ,&nbsp;Fernando dos Santos Magaço ,&nbsp;José António Fernandes Júnior ,&nbsp;Marcelo Neves Ribas ,&nbsp;Gilberto Romeiro de Oliveira Menezes ,&nbsp;Claudiana de Fátima Miranda ,&nbsp;Idalmo Garcia Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Improving feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality is crucial for sustainable beef production and meeting consumer demand. This study aimed to estimate (co)variance components and genetic parameters using pedigree and genomic information and assessed the impact of genomic data on genetic prediction for feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Senepol beef cattle. Phenotypic data were available from 4194 animals for residual feed intake (RFI), 4071 for dry matter intake (DMI), 11,411 for rib eye area (REA), 11,165 for subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), 9563 for marbling (MAR). Additionally, 4419 animals were genotyped. Genetic evaluations were performed using the traditional pedigree-based BLUP and the single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) via Bayesian inference, single-trait and multi-trait animal models. Predictive ability was validated through linear regression (LR) analysis, excluding 50 % of the phenotypic data. Heritability estimates were consistent across methods, ranging from 0.094 for RFI to 0.25 for REA. A positive genetic correlation (0.56) was observed between RFI and DMI, indicating that selection for lower RFI reduces DMI. However, an unfavorable positive correlation was observed between RFI and MAR (BLUP: 0.447; ssGBLUP: 0.33), suggesting that the intense selection for RFI alone could reduce marbling in the evaluated population. Genetic correlations were null between RFI-SFT and RFI-REA. Notably, ssGBLUP generally resulted in slightly reduced genetic correlation estimates for some traits. Overrall, ssGBLUP consistently yielded higher prediction accuracy, with an average increase of 16.20 % across traits compared to BLUP. These results underscore that incorporating genomic data significantly enhances genetic evaluation in Senepol beef cattle, enabling more accurate selection decisions for improved residual feed intake and meat quality traits in breeding programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Livestock Science\",\"volume\":\"299 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Livestock Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141325001167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141325001167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高饲料效率、胴体和肉质对可持续牛肉生产和满足消费者需求至关重要。本研究旨在利用家系和基因组信息估计(co)方差成分和遗传参数,并评估基因组数据对Senepol肉牛饲料效率、胴体和肉质性状遗传预测的影响。共收集了4194只动物的残采食量(RFI)、4071只动物的干物质采食量(DMI)、11411只动物的肋眼面积(REA)、11165只动物的皮下脂肪厚度(SFT)和9563只动物的大理石纹(MAR)的表型数据。此外,对4419只动物进行了基因分型。通过贝叶斯推理、单性状和多性状动物模型,分别采用传统的基于家系的BLUP和单步GBLUP (ssGBLUP)进行遗传评估。通过线性回归(LR)分析验证了预测能力,排除了50%的表型数据。不同方法的遗传力估计是一致的,范围从RFI的0.094到REA的0.25。RFI与DMI之间存在正相关(0.56),表明选择较低的RFI会降低DMI。然而,RFI与MAR之间存在不利的正相关(BLUP: 0.447;ssGBLUP: 0.33),表明RFI的强烈选择可以减少被评估人群的大理石纹。RFI-SFT和RFI-REA之间的遗传相关性为零。值得注意的是,ssGBLUP通常会导致某些性状的遗传相关性估计略有降低。总体而言,ssGBLUP的预测准确率一直较高,与BLUP相比,各性状的平均准确率提高了16.20%。这些结果强调,整合基因组数据可以显著提高Senepol肉牛的遗传评估,从而在育种计划中做出更准确的选择决策,以提高剩余采食量和肉质性状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic parameters and single-step genomic predictions for feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Senepol beef cattle
Improving feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality is crucial for sustainable beef production and meeting consumer demand. This study aimed to estimate (co)variance components and genetic parameters using pedigree and genomic information and assessed the impact of genomic data on genetic prediction for feed efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Senepol beef cattle. Phenotypic data were available from 4194 animals for residual feed intake (RFI), 4071 for dry matter intake (DMI), 11,411 for rib eye area (REA), 11,165 for subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), 9563 for marbling (MAR). Additionally, 4419 animals were genotyped. Genetic evaluations were performed using the traditional pedigree-based BLUP and the single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) via Bayesian inference, single-trait and multi-trait animal models. Predictive ability was validated through linear regression (LR) analysis, excluding 50 % of the phenotypic data. Heritability estimates were consistent across methods, ranging from 0.094 for RFI to 0.25 for REA. A positive genetic correlation (0.56) was observed between RFI and DMI, indicating that selection for lower RFI reduces DMI. However, an unfavorable positive correlation was observed between RFI and MAR (BLUP: 0.447; ssGBLUP: 0.33), suggesting that the intense selection for RFI alone could reduce marbling in the evaluated population. Genetic correlations were null between RFI-SFT and RFI-REA. Notably, ssGBLUP generally resulted in slightly reduced genetic correlation estimates for some traits. Overrall, ssGBLUP consistently yielded higher prediction accuracy, with an average increase of 16.20 % across traits compared to BLUP. These results underscore that incorporating genomic data significantly enhances genetic evaluation in Senepol beef cattle, enabling more accurate selection decisions for improved residual feed intake and meat quality traits in breeding programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信