Wenjie Pei , Jiangling Zhou , Yan Du , Juhua Yang , Pengpeng Zhang , Mingyue Pang
{"title":"中国风电南移过程中陆上风电场与海上风电场全生命周期环境影响比较","authors":"Wenjie Pei , Jiangling Zhou , Yan Du , Juhua Yang , Pengpeng Zhang , Mingyue Pang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Serious wind curtailment occurred in the Three North region in China around 2015; since then, wind power development has been moving southward. Wind resource and wind turbine technology variations would affect the environmental impacts of wind farms during this process. Here, we applied the life cycle assessment method to examine the environmental performance of wind farms during the southward movement using a comparison of six case wind farms that included one onshore farm in Inner Mongolia, three onshore farms in Shandong, and two offshore farms in Jiangsu. The results revealed that the onshore farms with larger stand-alone capacity (2 MW) in Shandong (with a life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 6.8–7.6 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) performed worse than the farm (1.5 MW) in Inner Mongolia (6.5 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) because of their lower annual utilization hours. Only the offshore farms also with larger stand-alone capacity (4.0–5.9 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) performed better than the farm in Inner Mongolia. These results suggest that wind turbine technological progress can offset wind resource weaknesses to a certain degree theoretically during the southward movement process. However, during practical operation, they all suffered from wind curtailment whether they were closer to the load center or not. Various measures to promote the green development of the wind power industry were proposed that included increasing the electricity consumption capacity and combining energy storage technologies. Finally, our results revealed that high-capacity turbines and offshore wind power could be prioritized when developing new wind farms during the southward movement process in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 146050"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of life-cycle environmental impacts of onshore and offshore wind farms during the southward movement of wind power development in China\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Pei , Jiangling Zhou , Yan Du , Juhua Yang , Pengpeng Zhang , Mingyue Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Serious wind curtailment occurred in the Three North region in China around 2015; since then, wind power development has been moving southward. Wind resource and wind turbine technology variations would affect the environmental impacts of wind farms during this process. Here, we applied the life cycle assessment method to examine the environmental performance of wind farms during the southward movement using a comparison of six case wind farms that included one onshore farm in Inner Mongolia, three onshore farms in Shandong, and two offshore farms in Jiangsu. The results revealed that the onshore farms with larger stand-alone capacity (2 MW) in Shandong (with a life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 6.8–7.6 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) performed worse than the farm (1.5 MW) in Inner Mongolia (6.5 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) because of their lower annual utilization hours. Only the offshore farms also with larger stand-alone capacity (4.0–5.9 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh) performed better than the farm in Inner Mongolia. These results suggest that wind turbine technological progress can offset wind resource weaknesses to a certain degree theoretically during the southward movement process. However, during practical operation, they all suffered from wind curtailment whether they were closer to the load center or not. Various measures to promote the green development of the wind power industry were proposed that included increasing the electricity consumption capacity and combining energy storage technologies. Finally, our results revealed that high-capacity turbines and offshore wind power could be prioritized when developing new wind farms during the southward movement process in China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"519 \",\"pages\":\"Article 146050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625014003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625014003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2015年前后,中国三北地区发生严重弃风;从那以后,风力发电的发展一直在向南移动。在此过程中,风力资源和风力涡轮机技术的变化将影响风力发电场对环境的影响。本文采用生命周期评价方法,对内蒙古1个陆上风电场、山东3个陆上风电场和江苏2个海上风电场等6个风电场进行比较,研究了风电场在南移过程中的环境绩效。结果表明,山东单机容量较大的陆上农场(2mw)(生命周期温室气体排放量为6.8-7.6 g CO2-eq/kWh)由于年利用小时数较低,其表现不如内蒙古农场(1.5 MW) (6.5 g CO2-eq/kWh)。只有单机容量较大(4.0-5.9 g co2当量/kWh)的海上养殖场表现优于内蒙古养殖场。这些结果表明,风力机技术进步在一定程度上理论上可以抵消风力资源在南移过程中的劣势。然而,在实际运行中,无论是否靠近负荷中心,它们都受到了风阻的影响。提出了提高风电消纳能力、结合储能技术等促进风电产业绿色发展的措施。最后,我们的研究结果表明,在中国南移过程中,在开发新的风电场时,可以优先考虑大容量涡轮机和海上风力发电。
Comparison of life-cycle environmental impacts of onshore and offshore wind farms during the southward movement of wind power development in China
Serious wind curtailment occurred in the Three North region in China around 2015; since then, wind power development has been moving southward. Wind resource and wind turbine technology variations would affect the environmental impacts of wind farms during this process. Here, we applied the life cycle assessment method to examine the environmental performance of wind farms during the southward movement using a comparison of six case wind farms that included one onshore farm in Inner Mongolia, three onshore farms in Shandong, and two offshore farms in Jiangsu. The results revealed that the onshore farms with larger stand-alone capacity (2 MW) in Shandong (with a life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 6.8–7.6 g CO2-eq/kWh) performed worse than the farm (1.5 MW) in Inner Mongolia (6.5 g CO2-eq/kWh) because of their lower annual utilization hours. Only the offshore farms also with larger stand-alone capacity (4.0–5.9 g CO2-eq/kWh) performed better than the farm in Inner Mongolia. These results suggest that wind turbine technological progress can offset wind resource weaknesses to a certain degree theoretically during the southward movement process. However, during practical operation, they all suffered from wind curtailment whether they were closer to the load center or not. Various measures to promote the green development of the wind power industry were proposed that included increasing the electricity consumption capacity and combining energy storage technologies. Finally, our results revealed that high-capacity turbines and offshore wind power could be prioritized when developing new wind farms during the southward movement process in China.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.