两种不同影响的热光生物调节方案后的自体富血小板血浆外泌体定量

IF 3.261
Laura Cordero , Joan Carles Domingo , Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno Mengual , Hernán Pinto
{"title":"两种不同影响的热光生物调节方案后的自体富血小板血浆外泌体定量","authors":"Laura Cordero ,&nbsp;Joan Carles Domingo ,&nbsp;Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno Mengual ,&nbsp;Hernán Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.jpap.2025.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess the effects on exosome quantification of thermo-photobiomodulation (TPBM) with blue light administered at two different fluences for preconditioning platelet-rich plasma (PRP).</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>This was an in-vitro study aiming to compare the number of exosomes released from PRP samples after preconditioning for 10 min with blue light (467 nm) at two different fluences, 1.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> and 2.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, and controlled heating at 37 °C. PRP samples form three healthy donors were obtained after withdrawing 64 mL of blood and were preconditioned following the two protocols using the MCT System®, a TPBM device with different energy, wavelength, temperature, and time combinations settings. Samples were placed in the MCT Kit® during the procedure, a single-use class IIa device with specific optical properties to optimize light scattering and transmittance. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation and quantified in triplicate using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean exosome concentration was 2.99 × 10<sup>11</sup> particles/mL (SD 1.31 × 10<sup>11</sup>) for the samples exposed to 1.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> and 2.53 × 10<sup>11</sup> particles/mL (SD 1.39 × 10<sup>11</sup>) for the samples exposed to 2.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.0262). The lower light fluence resulted in a 15.4 % increase in exosome concentration compared to the highest one.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different light fluences during the PRP preconditioning resulted in varying exosome concentrations, with the lowest fluence producing the highest yield. Further research is required to determine whether other fluences can improve outcomes and identify the most suitable preconditioning protocol.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2610,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous platelet-rich plasma exosome quantification after two thermo-photobiomodulation protocols with different fluences\",\"authors\":\"Laura Cordero ,&nbsp;Joan Carles Domingo ,&nbsp;Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno Mengual ,&nbsp;Hernán Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpap.2025.100267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess the effects on exosome quantification of thermo-photobiomodulation (TPBM) with blue light administered at two different fluences for preconditioning platelet-rich plasma (PRP).</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>This was an in-vitro study aiming to compare the number of exosomes released from PRP samples after preconditioning for 10 min with blue light (467 nm) at two different fluences, 1.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> and 2.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, and controlled heating at 37 °C. PRP samples form three healthy donors were obtained after withdrawing 64 mL of blood and were preconditioned following the two protocols using the MCT System®, a TPBM device with different energy, wavelength, temperature, and time combinations settings. Samples were placed in the MCT Kit® during the procedure, a single-use class IIa device with specific optical properties to optimize light scattering and transmittance. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation and quantified in triplicate using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean exosome concentration was 2.99 × 10<sup>11</sup> particles/mL (SD 1.31 × 10<sup>11</sup>) for the samples exposed to 1.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> and 2.53 × 10<sup>11</sup> particles/mL (SD 1.39 × 10<sup>11</sup>) for the samples exposed to 2.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.0262). The lower light fluence resulted in a 15.4 % increase in exosome concentration compared to the highest one.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Different light fluences during the PRP preconditioning resulted in varying exosome concentrations, with the lowest fluence producing the highest yield. Further research is required to determine whether other fluences can improve outcomes and identify the most suitable preconditioning protocol.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2610,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469025000090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469025000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究两种不同剂量蓝光预处理富血小板血浆(PRP)对热光生物调节(TPBM)外泌体定量的影响。材料和方法本实验旨在比较PRP样品在37°C受控加热下,在1.0 J/cm2和2.0 J/cm2两种不同强度的蓝光(467 nm)下预处理10 min后释放的外泌体数量。在抽取64 mL血液后获得3名健康献血者的PRP样本,并使用MCT System®(一种具有不同能量、波长、温度和时间组合设置的TPBM设备)按照两种方案进行预处理。在此过程中,样品被放置在MCT Kit®中,这是一种具有特定光学特性的一次性IIa类设备,可优化光散射和透射率。外泌体通过超离心分离,并采用纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)进行三次定量。结果1.0 J/cm2的外泌体平均浓度为2.99 × 1011粒/mL (SD 1.31 × 1011), 2.0 J/cm2的外泌体平均浓度为2.53 × 1011粒/mL (SD 1.39 × 1011) (p = 0.0262)。较低的光通量导致外泌体浓度比最高的光通量增加15.4%。结论PRP预处理过程中不同的光影响导致外泌体浓度不同,光影响越小产率越高。需要进一步的研究来确定其他影响是否可以改善结果并确定最合适的预处理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous platelet-rich plasma exosome quantification after two thermo-photobiomodulation protocols with different fluences

Objective

The study aimed to assess the effects on exosome quantification of thermo-photobiomodulation (TPBM) with blue light administered at two different fluences for preconditioning platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Material and Methods

This was an in-vitro study aiming to compare the number of exosomes released from PRP samples after preconditioning for 10 min with blue light (467 nm) at two different fluences, 1.0 J/cm2 and 2.0 J/cm2, and controlled heating at 37 °C. PRP samples form three healthy donors were obtained after withdrawing 64 mL of blood and were preconditioned following the two protocols using the MCT System®, a TPBM device with different energy, wavelength, temperature, and time combinations settings. Samples were placed in the MCT Kit® during the procedure, a single-use class IIa device with specific optical properties to optimize light scattering and transmittance. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation and quantified in triplicate using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA).

Results

The mean exosome concentration was 2.99 × 1011 particles/mL (SD 1.31 × 1011) for the samples exposed to 1.0 J/cm2 and 2.53 × 1011 particles/mL (SD 1.39 × 1011) for the samples exposed to 2.0 J/cm2 (p = 0.0262). The lower light fluence resulted in a 15.4 % increase in exosome concentration compared to the highest one.

Conclusions

Different light fluences during the PRP preconditioning resulted in varying exosome concentrations, with the lowest fluence producing the highest yield. Further research is required to determine whether other fluences can improve outcomes and identify the most suitable preconditioning protocol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信