绘制欧洲森林管理制度图

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Niek Scherpenhuijzen , Thales A.P. West , Niels Debonne , Saskia Oostdijk , Patricia Adame , Rasmus Astrup , Peter H. Verburg
{"title":"绘制欧洲森林管理制度图","authors":"Niek Scherpenhuijzen ,&nbsp;Thales A.P. West ,&nbsp;Niels Debonne ,&nbsp;Saskia Oostdijk ,&nbsp;Patricia Adame ,&nbsp;Rasmus Astrup ,&nbsp;Peter H. Verburg","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests provide a multitude of ecosystem services, such as wood provisioning, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and cultural value. Numerous European Union (EU) policies introduce diverse goals for forests, leading to inherent trade-offs when balancing different forest functions and targets. Effective planning is crucial for optimizing such trade-offs across Europe. This requires an understanding of the current spatial distribution of forest management regimes. However, the mapping of European forest management regimes is challenging due to the limited availability of comprehensive, harmonized data. This study aimed to produce a high-resolution forest management map for Europe by integrating the most recent spatial forest datasets from multiple sources available in the literature. Our integrated map depicts the spatial distribution of five forest management classes with different objectives, highlighting distinct regional patterns across the continent. Western Europe predominantly features <em>close-to-nature forestry</em> and <em>combined objective forestry</em>, whereas Northern Europe is characterized primarily by <em>intensive forestry</em>. Southern and Eastern Europe exhibit a more varied distribution, with <em>combined objective forestry</em> emerging as the most prevalent forest management class. <em>Unmanaged forests</em> are mostly found in Northern Europe and <em>very intensive forestry</em> in Portugal, Galicia, and Gascony. Comparison with National Forest Inventory data provides insight into the overlaps between European scale patterns from the mapping exercise and plot-level observations. This comprehensive map offers a valuable basis for policy decisions, supporting the EU's climate mitigation objectives and improving the understanding of forest management regimes across Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"594 ","pages":"Article 122940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping forest management regimes in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Niek Scherpenhuijzen ,&nbsp;Thales A.P. West ,&nbsp;Niels Debonne ,&nbsp;Saskia Oostdijk ,&nbsp;Patricia Adame ,&nbsp;Rasmus Astrup ,&nbsp;Peter H. Verburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forests provide a multitude of ecosystem services, such as wood provisioning, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and cultural value. Numerous European Union (EU) policies introduce diverse goals for forests, leading to inherent trade-offs when balancing different forest functions and targets. Effective planning is crucial for optimizing such trade-offs across Europe. This requires an understanding of the current spatial distribution of forest management regimes. However, the mapping of European forest management regimes is challenging due to the limited availability of comprehensive, harmonized data. This study aimed to produce a high-resolution forest management map for Europe by integrating the most recent spatial forest datasets from multiple sources available in the literature. Our integrated map depicts the spatial distribution of five forest management classes with different objectives, highlighting distinct regional patterns across the continent. Western Europe predominantly features <em>close-to-nature forestry</em> and <em>combined objective forestry</em>, whereas Northern Europe is characterized primarily by <em>intensive forestry</em>. Southern and Eastern Europe exhibit a more varied distribution, with <em>combined objective forestry</em> emerging as the most prevalent forest management class. <em>Unmanaged forests</em> are mostly found in Northern Europe and <em>very intensive forestry</em> in Portugal, Galicia, and Gascony. Comparison with National Forest Inventory data provides insight into the overlaps between European scale patterns from the mapping exercise and plot-level observations. This comprehensive map offers a valuable basis for policy decisions, supporting the EU's climate mitigation objectives and improving the understanding of forest management regimes across Europe.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"594 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725004487\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725004487","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林提供多种生态系统服务,如木材供应、碳封存、生物多样性保护和文化价值。欧洲联盟(欧盟)的许多政策为森林引入了不同的目标,导致在平衡不同的森林功能和目标时进行内在的权衡。有效的规划对于优化整个欧洲的这种权衡至关重要。这需要了解目前森林管理制度的空间分布情况。然而,由于全面、统一的数据有限,绘制欧洲森林管理制度的地图具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过整合文献中可获得的来自多个来源的最新空间森林数据集,为欧洲制作一张高分辨率森林管理地图。我们的综合地图描绘了具有不同目标的五种森林管理类别的空间分布,突出了整个非洲大陆不同的区域模式。西欧的主要特点是接近自然的林业和综合客观林业,而北欧的主要特点是集约化林业。南欧和东欧表现出更多样化的分布,综合客观林业成为最普遍的森林管理类别。无人管理的森林主要分布在北欧,而在葡萄牙、加利西亚和加斯科尼则有非常密集的森林。通过与国家森林清查数据的比较,可以深入了解欧洲比例尺模式在制图工作和小区级观测之间的重叠。这张综合地图为决策提供了宝贵的基础,支持欧盟的气候缓解目标,并增进对整个欧洲森林管理制度的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping forest management regimes in Europe
Forests provide a multitude of ecosystem services, such as wood provisioning, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and cultural value. Numerous European Union (EU) policies introduce diverse goals for forests, leading to inherent trade-offs when balancing different forest functions and targets. Effective planning is crucial for optimizing such trade-offs across Europe. This requires an understanding of the current spatial distribution of forest management regimes. However, the mapping of European forest management regimes is challenging due to the limited availability of comprehensive, harmonized data. This study aimed to produce a high-resolution forest management map for Europe by integrating the most recent spatial forest datasets from multiple sources available in the literature. Our integrated map depicts the spatial distribution of five forest management classes with different objectives, highlighting distinct regional patterns across the continent. Western Europe predominantly features close-to-nature forestry and combined objective forestry, whereas Northern Europe is characterized primarily by intensive forestry. Southern and Eastern Europe exhibit a more varied distribution, with combined objective forestry emerging as the most prevalent forest management class. Unmanaged forests are mostly found in Northern Europe and very intensive forestry in Portugal, Galicia, and Gascony. Comparison with National Forest Inventory data provides insight into the overlaps between European scale patterns from the mapping exercise and plot-level observations. This comprehensive map offers a valuable basis for policy decisions, supporting the EU's climate mitigation objectives and improving the understanding of forest management regimes across Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信