设计知识型企业的政府支持政策模型:元综合方法

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hanieh Mahooti , Reza Rostamzadeh , Karim Esgandari , Mojtaba Heidari
{"title":"设计知识型企业的政府支持政策模型:元综合方法","authors":"Hanieh Mahooti ,&nbsp;Reza Rostamzadeh ,&nbsp;Karim Esgandari ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Heidari","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a novel model for identifying the key categories and elements of government supportive policies targeted at knowledge-based companies. Employing a qualitative research design based on the meta-synthesis approach, the study follows the seven-step process outlined by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). A total of 34 studies were selected for final evaluation based on their relevance to the research topic and the quality of the sources. To ensure the reliability of the findings, inter-coder agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.81. The analysis, conducted using MAXQDA20 software, led to the identification of five key categories and 16 associated concepts. These categories include: (1) Supportive and Financial Policies, (2) Technology Development and Innovation, (3) Management and Organizational Development, (4) Development Challenges and Strategies, and (5) Sustainability and Environment. This model provides a practical framework for policymakers and organizational leaders to align strategies with effective government support mechanisms. The study also highlights critical gaps—particularly in areas such as R&amp;D subsidies, structural challenges, resource allocation, environmental considerations, and technology support—that should be addressed in future policy development. The findings offer important insights for both policymakers and knowledge-based companies by providing a framework to align governmental support with the evolving needs of these firms, thereby fostering innovation and sustainable growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a model of government supportive policies in knowledge-based companies: Meta synthesis approach\",\"authors\":\"Hanieh Mahooti ,&nbsp;Reza Rostamzadeh ,&nbsp;Karim Esgandari ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Heidari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a novel model for identifying the key categories and elements of government supportive policies targeted at knowledge-based companies. Employing a qualitative research design based on the meta-synthesis approach, the study follows the seven-step process outlined by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). A total of 34 studies were selected for final evaluation based on their relevance to the research topic and the quality of the sources. To ensure the reliability of the findings, inter-coder agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.81. The analysis, conducted using MAXQDA20 software, led to the identification of five key categories and 16 associated concepts. These categories include: (1) Supportive and Financial Policies, (2) Technology Development and Innovation, (3) Management and Organizational Development, (4) Development Challenges and Strategies, and (5) Sustainability and Environment. This model provides a practical framework for policymakers and organizational leaders to align strategies with effective government support mechanisms. The study also highlights critical gaps—particularly in areas such as R&amp;D subsidies, structural challenges, resource allocation, environmental considerations, and technology support—that should be addressed in future policy development. The findings offer important insights for both policymakers and knowledge-based companies by providing a framework to align governmental support with the evolving needs of these firms, thereby fostering innovation and sustainable growth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882500468X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882500468X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一种新的模型,用于识别针对知识型企业的政府扶持政策的关键类别和要素。本研究采用基于元综合方法的定性研究设计,遵循Sandelowski和Barroso(2007)概述的七步过程。根据其与研究主题的相关性和来源的质量,总共选择了34项研究进行最终评估。为了确保研究结果的可靠性,使用Kappa系数评估编码器间的一致性,该系数的值为0.81。使用MAXQDA20软件进行的分析导致了五个关键类别和16个相关概念的识别。这些类别包括:(1)支持和金融政策,(2)技术发展和创新,(3)管理和组织发展,(4)发展挑战和战略,以及(5)可持续性和环境。该模型为政策制定者和组织领导者提供了一个实用的框架,使战略与有效的政府支持机制相结合。该研究还强调了在未来政策制定中应解决的关键差距,特别是在研发补贴、结构性挑战、资源分配、环境考虑和技术支持等领域。研究结果为决策者和知识型企业提供了一个框架,使政府支持与这些企业不断变化的需求保持一致,从而促进创新和可持续增长,从而为决策者和知识型企业提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a model of government supportive policies in knowledge-based companies: Meta synthesis approach
This study presents a novel model for identifying the key categories and elements of government supportive policies targeted at knowledge-based companies. Employing a qualitative research design based on the meta-synthesis approach, the study follows the seven-step process outlined by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). A total of 34 studies were selected for final evaluation based on their relevance to the research topic and the quality of the sources. To ensure the reliability of the findings, inter-coder agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.81. The analysis, conducted using MAXQDA20 software, led to the identification of five key categories and 16 associated concepts. These categories include: (1) Supportive and Financial Policies, (2) Technology Development and Innovation, (3) Management and Organizational Development, (4) Development Challenges and Strategies, and (5) Sustainability and Environment. This model provides a practical framework for policymakers and organizational leaders to align strategies with effective government support mechanisms. The study also highlights critical gaps—particularly in areas such as R&D subsidies, structural challenges, resource allocation, environmental considerations, and technology support—that should be addressed in future policy development. The findings offer important insights for both policymakers and knowledge-based companies by providing a framework to align governmental support with the evolving needs of these firms, thereby fostering innovation and sustainable growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信