数字化教育对可持续教育和实践的影响:基于流行病前后与农村教育发展文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kingsley Okoye , Esmeralda Campos , Amit Das , Varsha Chakraborty , Mahuya Ghosh , Amlan Chakrabarti , Samira Hosseini
{"title":"数字化教育对可持续教育和实践的影响:基于流行病前后与农村教育发展文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Kingsley Okoye ,&nbsp;Esmeralda Campos ,&nbsp;Amit Das ,&nbsp;Varsha Chakraborty ,&nbsp;Mahuya Ghosh ,&nbsp;Amlan Chakrabarti ,&nbsp;Samira Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study identifies the pedagogical impact and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education. It applies the PRISMA methodology to investigate the available literatures by identifying potential barriers, challenges, and opportunities to the use and adoption of the <em>digitalized-education,</em> taking into account the pre-, intra-, and post-pandemic era and rural education development. By covering a seven-years period between 2017 and 2023, the study analyzed the modest contributions and pedagogical impact of the selected studies (<em>n</em> = 324) retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The data analysis include trend examination, geographical and contextual diversity of the dataset, and thematic synthesis of digital technologies’ benefits, challenges, and implementation in context of COVID-19 and rural education. This was done using methods such as Concept mapping and Text mining by leveraging data visualization and analytics tools: VOSviewer, Tableau, and R Statistics software. The study identified “digital divide” attributed to lack or limited access to digital (learning) technologies, and online educational platforms or resources as the main challenge to the effective adoption of digitalized-education, and attainment of quality of education and its delivery by the educators, particularly in the remote or resource-limited regions. The study empirically sheds light on the theoretical and practical implications of the key findings and result upon a <em>scalable</em> and <em>sustainable</em> education and practices, particularly in line the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) that are directly related to the quality of education, including reduced inequalities across the educational communities and/or a development-oriented educational society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100851"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of digitalized-education upon sustainable education and practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature based on pre-intra-and-post pandemic and rural education development\",\"authors\":\"Kingsley Okoye ,&nbsp;Esmeralda Campos ,&nbsp;Amit Das ,&nbsp;Varsha Chakraborty ,&nbsp;Mahuya Ghosh ,&nbsp;Amlan Chakrabarti ,&nbsp;Samira Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study identifies the pedagogical impact and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education. It applies the PRISMA methodology to investigate the available literatures by identifying potential barriers, challenges, and opportunities to the use and adoption of the <em>digitalized-education,</em> taking into account the pre-, intra-, and post-pandemic era and rural education development. By covering a seven-years period between 2017 and 2023, the study analyzed the modest contributions and pedagogical impact of the selected studies (<em>n</em> = 324) retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The data analysis include trend examination, geographical and contextual diversity of the dataset, and thematic synthesis of digital technologies’ benefits, challenges, and implementation in context of COVID-19 and rural education. This was done using methods such as Concept mapping and Text mining by leveraging data visualization and analytics tools: VOSviewer, Tableau, and R Statistics software. The study identified “digital divide” attributed to lack or limited access to digital (learning) technologies, and online educational platforms or resources as the main challenge to the effective adoption of digitalized-education, and attainment of quality of education and its delivery by the educators, particularly in the remote or resource-limited regions. The study empirically sheds light on the theoretical and practical implications of the key findings and result upon a <em>scalable</em> and <em>sustainable</em> education and practices, particularly in line the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) that are directly related to the quality of education, including reduced inequalities across the educational communities and/or a development-oriented educational society.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825004162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825004162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究确定了在教育中使用数字技术对教学的影响和机会。它应用PRISMA方法调查现有文献,确定使用和采用数字化教育的潜在障碍、挑战和机遇,同时考虑到大流行之前、内部和之后的时代以及农村教育的发展。该研究涵盖了2017年至2023年的7年时间,分析了从Scopus和Web of Science (WoS)数据库中检索到的选定研究(n = 324)的适度贡献和教学影响。数据分析包括趋势检查、数据集的地理和背景多样性,以及数字技术在2019冠状病毒病和农村教育背景下的效益、挑战和实施的专题综合。这是通过利用数据可视化和分析工具(VOSviewer、Tableau和R Statistics软件),使用概念映射和文本挖掘等方法完成的。该研究确定了“数字鸿沟”,这归因于缺乏或有限地获得数字(学习)技术和在线教育平台或资源,这是有效采用数字化教育的主要挑战,也是教育工作者实现教育质量和提供教育的主要挑战,特别是在偏远或资源有限的地区。该研究从经验上揭示了主要发现和结果对可扩展和可持续教育和实践的理论和实践意义,特别是符合与教育质量直接相关的联合国可持续发展目标(sdg),包括减少教育社区和/或以发展为导向的教育社会的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of digitalized-education upon sustainable education and practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature based on pre-intra-and-post pandemic and rural education development
This study identifies the pedagogical impact and opportunities to the use of digital technologies in education. It applies the PRISMA methodology to investigate the available literatures by identifying potential barriers, challenges, and opportunities to the use and adoption of the digitalized-education, taking into account the pre-, intra-, and post-pandemic era and rural education development. By covering a seven-years period between 2017 and 2023, the study analyzed the modest contributions and pedagogical impact of the selected studies (n = 324) retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The data analysis include trend examination, geographical and contextual diversity of the dataset, and thematic synthesis of digital technologies’ benefits, challenges, and implementation in context of COVID-19 and rural education. This was done using methods such as Concept mapping and Text mining by leveraging data visualization and analytics tools: VOSviewer, Tableau, and R Statistics software. The study identified “digital divide” attributed to lack or limited access to digital (learning) technologies, and online educational platforms or resources as the main challenge to the effective adoption of digitalized-education, and attainment of quality of education and its delivery by the educators, particularly in the remote or resource-limited regions. The study empirically sheds light on the theoretical and practical implications of the key findings and result upon a scalable and sustainable education and practices, particularly in line the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) that are directly related to the quality of education, including reduced inequalities across the educational communities and/or a development-oriented educational society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信