心脏手术患者的多模式镇痛和增强恢复结果:一项观察性队列研究。

Amanda M Kleiman,Siny Tsang,Susan M Walters,John S McNeil,Leora Yarboro,Isaac Wu,Miklos D Kertai,Laurent Glance,Michael A Mazzeffi
{"title":"心脏手术患者的多模式镇痛和增强恢复结果:一项观察性队列研究。","authors":"Amanda M Kleiman,Siny Tsang,Susan M Walters,John S McNeil,Leora Yarboro,Isaac Wu,Miklos D Kertai,Laurent Glance,Michael A Mazzeffi","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMultimodal analgesia, the use of more than 1 pharmacologic agent targeting different receptors, is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS), but there are limited studies to support its efficacy. We aimed to explore associations between multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery outcomes after cardiac surgery.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database from 2020 to 2023. Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve, or combined CABG-valve surgery were included. Our primary hypothesis was that multimodal analgesia would be associated with a lower maximum postoperative pain score on postoperative day 3 (POD3). Secondarily, we hypothesized that multimodal analgesia would be associated with reduced mechanical ventilation hours, intensive care unit stay, delirium, pneumonia, and reintubation. Linear mixed-effects regression models and generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to examine the extent the use of multimodal analgesia was associated with study outcomes after controlling for confounders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOver the 4-year study period, there were 17,371 eligible cardiac surgical cases and 15,515 patients (89.3%) received multimodal analgesia. There was no association between multimodal analgesia use and maximum postoperative pain score on POD3 (b = -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to 0.18, P = .57), after adjusting for confounders. There was an association between multimodal analgesia use and initial mechanical ventilation hours (b = 0.45 hours, 95% CI, 0.04-0.86, P = .03). Compared to patients who received multimodal analgesia, those who did not receive multimodal analgesia had approximately 30 minutes longer of initial mechanical ventilation time on average. Initial mechanical ventilation time decreased as the number of multimodal analgesic increased (b= -0.33 hours, 95% CI, -76 to -0.10, P = .14) for 1 multimodal analgesic; Est = -1.98 hours, 95% CI, -3.79 to -0.18, P = .03 for 5 multimodal analgesics). Acetaminophen use was associated with a reduced likelihood of delirium (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P = .02), while use of a regional nerve block was associated with increased likelihood of unplanned reintubation (OR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.12-2.27, P = .01).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn this retrospective study, multimodal analgesia was not associated with the primary outcome of reduction in maximum pain score but was associated with more rapid extubation. Larger prospective observational and randomized controlled trials of individual analgesic drugs are needed to optimize ERACS protocols.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery Outcomes in Cardiac Surgical Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda M Kleiman,Siny Tsang,Susan M Walters,John S McNeil,Leora Yarboro,Isaac Wu,Miklos D Kertai,Laurent Glance,Michael A Mazzeffi\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nMultimodal analgesia, the use of more than 1 pharmacologic agent targeting different receptors, is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS), but there are limited studies to support its efficacy. We aimed to explore associations between multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery outcomes after cardiac surgery.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database from 2020 to 2023. Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve, or combined CABG-valve surgery were included. Our primary hypothesis was that multimodal analgesia would be associated with a lower maximum postoperative pain score on postoperative day 3 (POD3). Secondarily, we hypothesized that multimodal analgesia would be associated with reduced mechanical ventilation hours, intensive care unit stay, delirium, pneumonia, and reintubation. Linear mixed-effects regression models and generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to examine the extent the use of multimodal analgesia was associated with study outcomes after controlling for confounders.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOver the 4-year study period, there were 17,371 eligible cardiac surgical cases and 15,515 patients (89.3%) received multimodal analgesia. There was no association between multimodal analgesia use and maximum postoperative pain score on POD3 (b = -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to 0.18, P = .57), after adjusting for confounders. There was an association between multimodal analgesia use and initial mechanical ventilation hours (b = 0.45 hours, 95% CI, 0.04-0.86, P = .03). Compared to patients who received multimodal analgesia, those who did not receive multimodal analgesia had approximately 30 minutes longer of initial mechanical ventilation time on average. Initial mechanical ventilation time decreased as the number of multimodal analgesic increased (b= -0.33 hours, 95% CI, -76 to -0.10, P = .14) for 1 multimodal analgesic; Est = -1.98 hours, 95% CI, -3.79 to -0.18, P = .03 for 5 multimodal analgesics). Acetaminophen use was associated with a reduced likelihood of delirium (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P = .02), while use of a regional nerve block was associated with increased likelihood of unplanned reintubation (OR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.12-2.27, P = .01).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIn this retrospective study, multimodal analgesia was not associated with the primary outcome of reduction in maximum pain score but was associated with more rapid extubation. Larger prospective observational and randomized controlled trials of individual analgesic drugs are needed to optimize ERACS protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多模式镇痛,即使用1种以上靶向不同受体的药物,是心脏手术后增强恢复(ERACS)的基础,但支持其疗效的研究有限。我们的目的是探讨多模式镇痛与心脏手术后增强恢复结果之间的关系。方法:我们使用来自美国胸外科学会数据库的2020年至2023年的数据进行回顾性队列研究。接受选择性冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、瓣膜手术或CABG-瓣膜联合手术的成年人被纳入研究。我们的主要假设是,多模式镇痛与术后第3天(POD3)最大术后疼痛评分较低有关。其次,我们假设多模式镇痛与减少机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间、谵妄、肺炎和再插管有关。在控制混杂因素后,使用线性混合效应回归模型和广义线性混合效应回归模型来检验多模式镇痛的使用与研究结果的关联程度。结果在4年的研究期间,有17371例符合条件的心脏手术患者,15515例(89.3%)接受了多模式镇痛。在调整混杂因素后,多模式镇痛的使用与POD3的最大术后疼痛评分没有关联(b = -0.07, 95%可信区间[CI], -0.32至0.18,P = 0.57)。多模式镇痛的使用与初始机械通气时间相关(b = 0.45小时,95% CI, 0.04-0.86, P = 0.03)。与接受多模态镇痛的患者相比,未接受多模态镇痛的患者初始机械通气时间平均延长约30分钟。首次机械通气时间随着多模态镇痛药数量的增加而减少(b= -0.33小时,95% CI, -76 ~ -0.10, P = 0.14);Est = -1.98小时,95% CI, -3.79 ~ -0.18, 5种多模式镇痛药的P = 0.03)。对乙酰氨基酚的使用与谵妄的可能性降低相关(优势比[OR] = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P = 0.02),而局部神经阻滞的使用与意外再插管的可能性增加相关(OR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.12-2.27, P = 0.01)。结论在这项回顾性研究中,多模式镇痛与最大疼痛评分降低的主要结局无关,但与拔管速度加快有关。需要对单个镇痛药物进行更大规模的前瞻性观察和随机对照试验来优化ERACS方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery Outcomes in Cardiac Surgical Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.
BACKGROUND Multimodal analgesia, the use of more than 1 pharmacologic agent targeting different receptors, is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS), but there are limited studies to support its efficacy. We aimed to explore associations between multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery outcomes after cardiac surgery. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database from 2020 to 2023. Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve, or combined CABG-valve surgery were included. Our primary hypothesis was that multimodal analgesia would be associated with a lower maximum postoperative pain score on postoperative day 3 (POD3). Secondarily, we hypothesized that multimodal analgesia would be associated with reduced mechanical ventilation hours, intensive care unit stay, delirium, pneumonia, and reintubation. Linear mixed-effects regression models and generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to examine the extent the use of multimodal analgesia was associated with study outcomes after controlling for confounders. RESULTS Over the 4-year study period, there were 17,371 eligible cardiac surgical cases and 15,515 patients (89.3%) received multimodal analgesia. There was no association between multimodal analgesia use and maximum postoperative pain score on POD3 (b = -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to 0.18, P = .57), after adjusting for confounders. There was an association between multimodal analgesia use and initial mechanical ventilation hours (b = 0.45 hours, 95% CI, 0.04-0.86, P = .03). Compared to patients who received multimodal analgesia, those who did not receive multimodal analgesia had approximately 30 minutes longer of initial mechanical ventilation time on average. Initial mechanical ventilation time decreased as the number of multimodal analgesic increased (b= -0.33 hours, 95% CI, -76 to -0.10, P = .14) for 1 multimodal analgesic; Est = -1.98 hours, 95% CI, -3.79 to -0.18, P = .03 for 5 multimodal analgesics). Acetaminophen use was associated with a reduced likelihood of delirium (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P = .02), while use of a regional nerve block was associated with increased likelihood of unplanned reintubation (OR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.12-2.27, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, multimodal analgesia was not associated with the primary outcome of reduction in maximum pain score but was associated with more rapid extubation. Larger prospective observational and randomized controlled trials of individual analgesic drugs are needed to optimize ERACS protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信