半体积GlobalFiler™PCR协议效率的研究:内部验证,降解痕量分析,并与使用案例样品的全体积协议进行比较。

Tamás Cseppentő, Katalin A Rádóczy, Eszter É Lőrincz, Gábor Bihari, Norbert Mátrai, Bálint Megadja, Attila Heinrich, Sándor Füredi, Nóra M Magonyi
{"title":"半体积GlobalFiler™PCR协议效率的研究:内部验证,降解痕量分析,并与使用案例样品的全体积协议进行比较。","authors":"Tamás Cseppentő, Katalin A Rádóczy, Eszter É Lőrincz, Gábor Bihari, Norbert Mátrai, Bálint Megadja, Attila Heinrich, Sándor Füredi, Nóra M Magonyi","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to its versatility, the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit is commonly used in forensic analyses. The half-volume protocol used in our laboratory was validated by manually and automatically assembled PCRs involving increased number of PCR cycles. Validation parameters included tests of sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, repeatability, and casework study, in accordance with the guidelines of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods and the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. To examine the efficiency of our custom half-volume and the manufacturer's full-volume protocol, we also compared the results of 266 casework samples amplified two times with both protocols. Our results demonstrated the high discriminatory power and robustness of the kit, as all the studied parameters provided appropriate results when the optimal 0.5 ng DNA input was used, regardless of the PCR preparation method. In the case of undegraded samples, DNA inputs in a range of 1-0.075 ng produced DNA profiles in an optimal RFU range without significant allelic dropout for both PCR preparation methods. Regarding the tests on degraded casework samples, the average locus dropouts for lowly, moderately, and highly degraded samples were 12.05%, 19.2%, and 33.79%, respectively, proving again the kit's abilities even in half-volume reaction mix. This protocol caused no loss of information, as comparing its results to the full-volume protocol's, the recovery of alleles showed no statistical difference. Based on our results, the GlobalFiler™ kit's numerous positive properties proved valid in the case of our half-volume protocol as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on efficiency of the half-volume GlobalFiler™ PCR protocol: Internal validation, degraded trace analysis, and comparison with full-volume protocol using casework samples.\",\"authors\":\"Tamás Cseppentő, Katalin A Rádóczy, Eszter É Lőrincz, Gábor Bihari, Norbert Mátrai, Bálint Megadja, Attila Heinrich, Sándor Füredi, Nóra M Magonyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to its versatility, the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit is commonly used in forensic analyses. The half-volume protocol used in our laboratory was validated by manually and automatically assembled PCRs involving increased number of PCR cycles. Validation parameters included tests of sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, repeatability, and casework study, in accordance with the guidelines of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods and the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. To examine the efficiency of our custom half-volume and the manufacturer's full-volume protocol, we also compared the results of 266 casework samples amplified two times with both protocols. Our results demonstrated the high discriminatory power and robustness of the kit, as all the studied parameters provided appropriate results when the optimal 0.5 ng DNA input was used, regardless of the PCR preparation method. In the case of undegraded samples, DNA inputs in a range of 1-0.075 ng produced DNA profiles in an optimal RFU range without significant allelic dropout for both PCR preparation methods. Regarding the tests on degraded casework samples, the average locus dropouts for lowly, moderately, and highly degraded samples were 12.05%, 19.2%, and 33.79%, respectively, proving again the kit's abilities even in half-volume reaction mix. This protocol caused no loss of information, as comparing its results to the full-volume protocol's, the recovery of alleles showed no statistical difference. Based on our results, the GlobalFiler™ kit's numerous positive properties proved valid in the case of our half-volume protocol as well.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其通用性,GlobalFiler™PCR扩增试剂盒通常用于法医分析。我们实验室使用的半体积方案通过手动和自动组装PCR进行验证,包括增加PCR循环次数。根据DNA分析方法科学工作组和欧洲法医学研究所网络的指导方针,验证参数包括敏感性、稳定性、再现性、可重复性和个案研究测试。为了检验我们定制的半体积和制造商的全体积方案的效率,我们还比较了266个病例样本的结果,这些样本都被放大了两次。我们的结果证明了试剂盒的高分辨能力和稳健性,因为当使用最佳的0.5 ng DNA输入时,无论采用何种PCR制备方法,所有研究参数都提供了合适的结果。在未降解样品的情况下,DNA输入在1-0.075 ng范围内产生的DNA谱在最佳RFU范围内,两种PCR制备方法都没有显着的等位基因丢失。对于降解的案例样品,低降解、中等降解和高度降解样品的平均位点辍学率分别为12.05%、19.2%和33.79%,再次证明了该试剂盒在半体积反应混合物中的能力。该方案没有造成信息丢失,因为其结果与全体积方案的结果相比,等位基因的恢复没有统计学差异。根据我们的结果,GlobalFiler™试剂盒的许多积极特性在我们的半体积协议中也被证明是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on efficiency of the half-volume GlobalFiler™ PCR protocol: Internal validation, degraded trace analysis, and comparison with full-volume protocol using casework samples.

Due to its versatility, the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit is commonly used in forensic analyses. The half-volume protocol used in our laboratory was validated by manually and automatically assembled PCRs involving increased number of PCR cycles. Validation parameters included tests of sensitivity, stability, reproducibility, repeatability, and casework study, in accordance with the guidelines of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods and the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. To examine the efficiency of our custom half-volume and the manufacturer's full-volume protocol, we also compared the results of 266 casework samples amplified two times with both protocols. Our results demonstrated the high discriminatory power and robustness of the kit, as all the studied parameters provided appropriate results when the optimal 0.5 ng DNA input was used, regardless of the PCR preparation method. In the case of undegraded samples, DNA inputs in a range of 1-0.075 ng produced DNA profiles in an optimal RFU range without significant allelic dropout for both PCR preparation methods. Regarding the tests on degraded casework samples, the average locus dropouts for lowly, moderately, and highly degraded samples were 12.05%, 19.2%, and 33.79%, respectively, proving again the kit's abilities even in half-volume reaction mix. This protocol caused no loss of information, as comparing its results to the full-volume protocol's, the recovery of alleles showed no statistical difference. Based on our results, the GlobalFiler™ kit's numerous positive properties proved valid in the case of our half-volume protocol as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信