眼下垂综合征和上斜肌麻痹患者主观环垂直偏差和客观眼扭转的比较。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Manami Kawai, Toshiaki Goseki, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Nobuyuki Shoji
{"title":"眼下垂综合征和上斜肌麻痹患者主观环垂直偏差和客观眼扭转的比较。","authors":"Manami Kawai, Toshiaki Goseki, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Nobuyuki Shoji","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). <i>Study design</i>: Prospectivestudy. <i>Methods</i>: Patients with CSES (<i>n</i> = 22) and unilateral SOP (<i>n</i> = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. <i>Results</i>: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (<i>p</i> < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(<i>p</i> = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (<i>p</i> = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (<i>p</i> < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. <i>Conclusions</i>: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in sagging eye syndrome and superior oblique palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Manami Kawai, Toshiaki Goseki, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Nobuyuki Shoji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). <i>Study design</i>: Prospectivestudy. <i>Methods</i>: Patients with CSES (<i>n</i> = 22) and unilateral SOP (<i>n</i> = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. <i>Results</i>: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (<i>p</i> < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(<i>p</i> = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (<i>p</i> = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (<i>p</i> < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. <i>Conclusions</i>: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strabismus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较老年环垂下垂眼综合征(CSES)与上斜肌麻痹(SOP)患者主观环垂偏差和客观眼扭转的鉴别临床特征。研究设计:前瞻性研究。方法:选取年龄≥50岁的CSES患者22例,单侧SOP患者20例。主观循环垂直偏差测量在第一,第二和第三凝视位置使用天气词。评估客观眼扭转的椎间盘-中央凹角(DFA)是用眼底照片测量的。结果:CSES组主观主位垂直偏差为1.3°(中位数),SOP组主观主位垂直偏差为4.3°(p p p = 0.48)。下视位时,SOP组的眼周偏差较大(p p = 0.85),低视位时,CSES组的眼周偏差为-12.2°,SOP组的眼周偏差为-16.3°(p结论:SOP眼周偏差大于SES眼周偏差。外旋无助于辨别主位,但如果下视时偏大,则更有可能是SOP。DFA无明显临床差异;这两种疾病与DFA很难区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in sagging eye syndrome and superior oblique palsy.

Purpose: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). Study design: Prospectivestudy. Methods: Patients with CSES (n = 22) and unilateral SOP (n = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. Results: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (p < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (p < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(p = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (p < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (p = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (p < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. Conclusions: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信