{"title":"眼下垂综合征和上斜肌麻痹患者主观环垂直偏差和客观眼扭转的比较。","authors":"Manami Kawai, Toshiaki Goseki, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Nobuyuki Shoji","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). <i>Study design</i>: Prospectivestudy. <i>Methods</i>: Patients with CSES (<i>n</i> = 22) and unilateral SOP (<i>n</i> = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. <i>Results</i>: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (<i>p</i> < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(<i>p</i> = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (<i>p</i> = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (<i>p</i> < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. <i>Conclusions</i>: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in sagging eye syndrome and superior oblique palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Manami Kawai, Toshiaki Goseki, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Nobuyuki Shoji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). <i>Study design</i>: Prospectivestudy. <i>Methods</i>: Patients with CSES (<i>n</i> = 22) and unilateral SOP (<i>n</i> = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. <i>Results</i>: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (<i>p</i> < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(<i>p</i> = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (<i>p</i> < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (<i>p</i> = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (<i>p</i> < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. <i>Conclusions</i>: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strabismus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2514123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较老年环垂下垂眼综合征(CSES)与上斜肌麻痹(SOP)患者主观环垂偏差和客观眼扭转的鉴别临床特征。研究设计:前瞻性研究。方法:选取年龄≥50岁的CSES患者22例,单侧SOP患者20例。主观循环垂直偏差测量在第一,第二和第三凝视位置使用天气词。评估客观眼扭转的椎间盘-中央凹角(DFA)是用眼底照片测量的。结果:CSES组主观主位垂直偏差为1.3°(中位数),SOP组主观主位垂直偏差为4.3°(p p p = 0.48)。下视位时,SOP组的眼周偏差较大(p p = 0.85),低视位时,CSES组的眼周偏差为-12.2°,SOP组的眼周偏差为-16.3°(p结论:SOP眼周偏差大于SES眼周偏差。外旋无助于辨别主位,但如果下视时偏大,则更有可能是SOP。DFA无明显临床差异;这两种疾病与DFA很难区分。
Comparison of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in sagging eye syndrome and superior oblique palsy.
Purpose: To compare the differentiating clinical features of subjective cyclovertical deviation and objective ocular torsion in elderly patients with cyclovertical sagging eye syndrome (CSES) versus superior oblique palsy (SOP). Study design: Prospectivestudy. Methods: Patients with CSES (n = 22) and unilateral SOP (n = 20) aged ≥50 years were included. Subjective cyclovertical deviation was measured in the primary, secondary, and third-gaze positions using a synoptophore. The disc-fovea angle (DFA), which evaluates objective ocular torsion, was measured using fundus photographs. Results: The subjective vertical deviation of the primary position was 1.3° (median) in the CSES group and 4.3° in the SOP group (p < .001). Vertical deviation was larger in the SOP than CSES group in all gaze positions (p < .05). The subjective cyclodeviation of the primary gaze was -6.0° (-: excyclo) in the CSES and SOP groups(p = .48). Cyclodeviation was larger in the SOP group in downgaze positions (p < .05). The mean DFAs were -11.5° in CSES group and -11.8° in SOP group for the hypertrophic eye (p = .85), and -12.2° in CSES group and -16.3° in SOP group for the hypotropic eye (p < .01). The ratio of patients with a larger DFA in the hypertropic than hypotropic eye was 9/22 (41.0%) in the CSES group and 4/20 (20%) in the SOP group. Conclusions: SOP has a larger hypertropia than SES. Excyclotorsion does not help distinguish in primary position but if it is somewhat larger in downgaze more likely SOP. DFA showed no obvious clinical differences; it is difficult to distinguish the two diseases from DFA.