{"title":"两种儿童身体读写自我报告量表的收敛效度和已知组效度检验。","authors":"Olivia Valentine, Ted Brown, Mong-Lin Yu","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the convergent validity and known-groups validity of the two children's self-report physical literacy (PL) scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight neurotypical children aged 8-to-12-years completed the <i>Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth Self</i> (PLAYself) and the <i>Physical Literacy for Children Questionnaire</i> (PL-C Quest). Spearman's rho correlations were used to examine the convergent validity of the PLAYself and PL-C Quest, and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate the known-groups validity by comparing boys' and girls' self-reported PL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple statistically significant correlations were found between the PL-C Quest and PLAYself subscales, including a positive correlation between the Total Percentage scores of each scale (rho = .56, <i>p</i> < .01). Additionally, one statistically significant difference was found between girls (<i>M</i> = 227.13, SD = 54.83) and boys (<i>M</i> = 177.75, SD = 55.76) on the self-reported PLAYself Relative Rankings - Literacy subscale score, t(1) = 2.34, <i>p</i> = .03.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PLAYself and PL-C Quest exhibited several significant correlations, supporting their convergent validity. However, only limited evidence of known-groups validity was provided with only one significant difference between the two child-reported PL scales. These results suggest a need for further research to explore alternative factors influencing children's PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Convergent Validity and Known-Groups Validity of Two Children's Self-Report Physical Literacy Scales.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Valentine, Ted Brown, Mong-Lin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the convergent validity and known-groups validity of the two children's self-report physical literacy (PL) scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight neurotypical children aged 8-to-12-years completed the <i>Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth Self</i> (PLAYself) and the <i>Physical Literacy for Children Questionnaire</i> (PL-C Quest). Spearman's rho correlations were used to examine the convergent validity of the PLAYself and PL-C Quest, and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate the known-groups validity by comparing boys' and girls' self-reported PL scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple statistically significant correlations were found between the PL-C Quest and PLAYself subscales, including a positive correlation between the Total Percentage scores of each scale (rho = .56, <i>p</i> < .01). Additionally, one statistically significant difference was found between girls (<i>M</i> = 227.13, SD = 54.83) and boys (<i>M</i> = 177.75, SD = 55.76) on the self-reported PLAYself Relative Rankings - Literacy subscale score, t(1) = 2.34, <i>p</i> = .03.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PLAYself and PL-C Quest exhibited several significant correlations, supporting their convergent validity. However, only limited evidence of known-groups validity was provided with only one significant difference between the two child-reported PL scales. These results suggest a need for further research to explore alternative factors influencing children's PL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2519912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:检验两种儿童身体素养自述量表的收敛效度和已知组效度。方法:28名8 ~ 12岁的神经正常儿童完成了青少年自我身体素养评估(PLAYself)和儿童身体素养问卷(PL-C Quest)。采用Spearman’s rho相关检验PLAYself和PL- c Quest的收敛效度,并通过比较男孩和女孩自我报告的PL分数进行独立t检验来评估已知组效度。结果:PL-C Quest和PLAYself子量表之间存在多个统计学显著相关,包括各量表Total Percentage得分之间存在正相关(rho = 0.56, p < 0.01)。此外,女孩(M = 227.13, SD = 54.83)和男孩(M = 177.75, SD = 55.76)在自我报告的PLAYself相对排名-识字亚量表得分上存在统计学差异,t(1) = 2.34, p = 0.03。结论:PLAYself和PL-C Quest具有显著的相关性,支持它们的收敛效度。然而,只有有限的证据表明,已知组效度,只有一个显著差异在两个儿童报告的PL量表。这些结果表明,有必要进一步研究影响儿童学习成绩的其他因素。
Examining the Convergent Validity and Known-Groups Validity of Two Children's Self-Report Physical Literacy Scales.
Aim: To examine the convergent validity and known-groups validity of the two children's self-report physical literacy (PL) scales.
Methods: Twenty-eight neurotypical children aged 8-to-12-years completed the Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth Self (PLAYself) and the Physical Literacy for Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest). Spearman's rho correlations were used to examine the convergent validity of the PLAYself and PL-C Quest, and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate the known-groups validity by comparing boys' and girls' self-reported PL scores.
Results: Multiple statistically significant correlations were found between the PL-C Quest and PLAYself subscales, including a positive correlation between the Total Percentage scores of each scale (rho = .56, p < .01). Additionally, one statistically significant difference was found between girls (M = 227.13, SD = 54.83) and boys (M = 177.75, SD = 55.76) on the self-reported PLAYself Relative Rankings - Literacy subscale score, t(1) = 2.34, p = .03.
Conclusions: The PLAYself and PL-C Quest exhibited several significant correlations, supporting their convergent validity. However, only limited evidence of known-groups validity was provided with only one significant difference between the two child-reported PL scales. These results suggest a need for further research to explore alternative factors influencing children's PL.
期刊介绍:
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine