配备光检测和测距技术的智能手机对下肢淋巴水肿的圆周和体积测量的评估。

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Masato Tsuchiya, Kanako Abe, Satoshi Kubo, Ryuichi Azuma
{"title":"配备光检测和测距技术的智能手机对下肢淋巴水肿的圆周和体积测量的评估。","authors":"Masato Tsuchiya, Kanako Abe, Satoshi Kubo, Ryuichi Azuma","doi":"10.3390/bios15060381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) requires precise limb measurements for treatment evaluation and compression garment design. Tape measurement (TM) is the standard method but is time-consuming. Smartphones with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology may offer fast and efficient alternatives for three-dimensional imaging and measurement. This study evaluated the accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency of LiDAR measurements compared with those of TM in patients with LEL. A healthy volunteer and 55 patients were included. Circumferences of the foot, ankle, calf, knee, and thigh and the volume were measured using TM and smartphones with LiDAR. The water displacement method was used to validate volume measurements. The measurement time, reliability, correlation, agreement, and systematic differences between the methods were assessed. LiDAR showed excellent reliability in the healthy volunteer (inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.960-0.988) and significantly reduced the measurement time compared with TM (64.0 ± 15.1 vs. 115.3 ± 30.6 s). In patients with LEL, strong correlations and agreements were observed for ankle, calf, and knee measurements. However, foot and thigh measurements showed lower correlations and larger discrepancies. LiDAR has excellent accuracy and reliability in measuring the circumference and volume of the lower leg and has the potential to reduce the time required to acquire data. Limitations include lower accuracy for foot and thigh measurements and the current workflow complexity, which requires the use of multiple software tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48608,"journal":{"name":"Biosensors-Basel","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Smartphones Equipped with Light Detection and Ranging Technology for Circumferential and Volumetric Measurements in Lower Extremity Lymphedema.\",\"authors\":\"Masato Tsuchiya, Kanako Abe, Satoshi Kubo, Ryuichi Azuma\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bios15060381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) requires precise limb measurements for treatment evaluation and compression garment design. Tape measurement (TM) is the standard method but is time-consuming. Smartphones with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology may offer fast and efficient alternatives for three-dimensional imaging and measurement. This study evaluated the accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency of LiDAR measurements compared with those of TM in patients with LEL. A healthy volunteer and 55 patients were included. Circumferences of the foot, ankle, calf, knee, and thigh and the volume were measured using TM and smartphones with LiDAR. The water displacement method was used to validate volume measurements. The measurement time, reliability, correlation, agreement, and systematic differences between the methods were assessed. LiDAR showed excellent reliability in the healthy volunteer (inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.960-0.988) and significantly reduced the measurement time compared with TM (64.0 ± 15.1 vs. 115.3 ± 30.6 s). In patients with LEL, strong correlations and agreements were observed for ankle, calf, and knee measurements. However, foot and thigh measurements showed lower correlations and larger discrepancies. LiDAR has excellent accuracy and reliability in measuring the circumference and volume of the lower leg and has the potential to reduce the time required to acquire data. Limitations include lower accuracy for foot and thigh measurements and the current workflow complexity, which requires the use of multiple software tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosensors-Basel\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosensors-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060381\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosensors-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下肢淋巴水肿(LEL)需要精确的肢体测量来进行治疗评估和压缩服设计。卷尺测量(TM)是标准的测量方法,但耗时较长。具有光探测和测距(LiDAR)技术的智能手机可能为三维成像和测量提供快速有效的替代方案。本研究评估了激光雷达测量与TM在LEL患者中的准确性、可靠性和时间效率。其中包括一名健康志愿者和55名患者。使用TM和带有激光雷达的智能手机测量足部、脚踝、小腿、膝盖和大腿的周长和体积。采用水驱替法对体积测量结果进行了验证。评估了测量时间、可靠性、相关性、一致性和方法之间的系统差异。与TM相比,LiDAR在健康志愿者中具有良好的信度(组内相关系数:0.960 ~ 0.988),测量时间显著缩短(64.0±15.1 vs 115.3±30.6 s)。在LEL患者中,观察到踝关节、小腿和膝关节测量结果具有很强的相关性和一致性。然而,脚和大腿的测量结果显示相关性较低,差异较大。激光雷达在测量小腿的周长和体积方面具有极高的准确性和可靠性,并且有可能减少获取数据所需的时间。局限性包括脚和大腿测量的精度较低,以及当前工作流程的复杂性,这需要使用多种软件工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Smartphones Equipped with Light Detection and Ranging Technology for Circumferential and Volumetric Measurements in Lower Extremity Lymphedema.

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) requires precise limb measurements for treatment evaluation and compression garment design. Tape measurement (TM) is the standard method but is time-consuming. Smartphones with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology may offer fast and efficient alternatives for three-dimensional imaging and measurement. This study evaluated the accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency of LiDAR measurements compared with those of TM in patients with LEL. A healthy volunteer and 55 patients were included. Circumferences of the foot, ankle, calf, knee, and thigh and the volume were measured using TM and smartphones with LiDAR. The water displacement method was used to validate volume measurements. The measurement time, reliability, correlation, agreement, and systematic differences between the methods were assessed. LiDAR showed excellent reliability in the healthy volunteer (inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.960-0.988) and significantly reduced the measurement time compared with TM (64.0 ± 15.1 vs. 115.3 ± 30.6 s). In patients with LEL, strong correlations and agreements were observed for ankle, calf, and knee measurements. However, foot and thigh measurements showed lower correlations and larger discrepancies. LiDAR has excellent accuracy and reliability in measuring the circumference and volume of the lower leg and has the potential to reduce the time required to acquire data. Limitations include lower accuracy for foot and thigh measurements and the current workflow complexity, which requires the use of multiple software tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosensors-Basel
Biosensors-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
983
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biosensors (ISSN 2079-6374) provides an advanced forum for studies related to the science and technology of biosensors and biosensing. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信