当地烟草零售许可与成人卷烟和电子烟使用的种族、民族、收入和教育(2016-2022)之间的关系:加州的案例。

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer
{"title":"当地烟草零售许可与成人卷烟和电子烟使用的种族、民族、收入和教育(2016-2022)之间的关系:加州的案例。","authors":"Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer","doi":"10.1177/15248399251340400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251340400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Local Tobacco Retail Licensing and Adult Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use by Race and Ethnicity, Income, and Education (2016-2022): The Case in California.\",\"authors\":\"Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251340400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251340400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251340400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251340400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以加利福尼亚州为例,调查了当地烟草零售许可(TRL)法律力度与成人烟草使用模式(即香烟、电子烟和双重使用)之间的关系,以及社会人口统计学特征的差异。我们合并了2016年至2022年美国肺脏协会(ALA)烟草控制报告和加州健康访谈调查(CHIS)的数据。我们将ALA的地方政策等级重新编码为最强(最高等级)和较弱(所有其他等级)。使用定量方法,我们估计了多层次多项式逻辑回归模型,以检验当地TRL法律的力度与25岁及以上的成年人中香烟和电子烟的单一和双重使用之间的关系,这些成年人以城市/城镇为巢。我们还通过在不同的模型中包括种族和民族、收入和教育的相互作用术语来检查影响修改的可能性。我们的研究结果表明,在任何模型中,较强的TRL等级与专用香烟、电子烟或双重用途之间都不存在关联。在统计上,种族、民族、收入或教育也没有显著的相互作用。这些无效发现表明,虽然TRL法律可能对限制青少年获取有用,但当地TRL强度可能对成人尼古丁消费影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Local Tobacco Retail Licensing and Adult Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use by Race and Ethnicity, Income, and Education (2016-2022): The Case in California.

This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信