Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer
{"title":"当地烟草零售许可与成人卷烟和电子烟使用的种族、民族、收入和教育(2016-2022)之间的关系:加州的案例。","authors":"Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer","doi":"10.1177/15248399251340400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251340400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Local Tobacco Retail Licensing and Adult Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use by Race and Ethnicity, Income, and Education (2016-2022): The Case in California.\",\"authors\":\"Bukola Usidame Peters, Yanmei Xie, David Colston, Andrea R Titus, Lisa Henriksen, Brian C Kelly, Nancy L Fleischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251340400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251340400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251340400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251340400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between Local Tobacco Retail Licensing and Adult Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use by Race and Ethnicity, Income, and Education (2016-2022): The Case in California.
This study investigates associations between the strength of local Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) laws and adult tobacco use patterns (i.e., cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use), and differences by sociodemographic characteristics, using California as a case study. We merged data from the American Lung Association's (ALA) State of Tobacco Control Reports and the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) from 2016 to 2022. We recoded the ALA local policy grades as strongest (highest grade) versus weaker (all other grades). Using quantitative methods, we estimated multilevel multinomial logistic regression models to examine the relationship between the strength of local TRL laws and cigarette and e-cigarette single and dual use among adults aged 25 and older, nesting by city/town. We also examined the potential for effect modification by including interaction terms for race and ethnicity, income, and education in separate models. Our results showed that no associations existed between stronger TRL grades and exclusive cigarette, e-cigarette or dual use in any of the models. Neither were there statistically significant interactions by race and ethnicity, income, or education. These null findings suggest that while TRL laws may potentially be useful to restrict adolescent access, local TRL strength may have few impacts on adult nicotine consumption.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.