用药安全冒险径:提高公众用药安全意识的教育干预。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13030075
Audrey Flornoy-Guédon, Liliane Gschwind, Antoine Poncet, Pierre Chopard, Caroline Fonzo-Christe, Pascal Bonnabry
{"title":"用药安全冒险径:提高公众用药安全意识的教育干预。","authors":"Audrey Flornoy-Guédon, Liliane Gschwind, Antoine Poncet, Pierre Chopard, Caroline Fonzo-Christe, Pascal Bonnabry","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13030075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engaging patients in medication safety is essential but remains under-addressed in hospital settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the impact of an educational intervention-the Medication Safety Adventure Trail-on medication safety knowledge and satisfaction among hospital visitors. A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention using this educational tool was conducted over five days. A booth was set up in a hospital lobby inviting all passers-by to follow a six-step trail involving riddles to solve. The experiment comprised three phases: 1. Briefing plus pre-test; 2. The trail; 3. Debriefing plus post-test. A logistic mixed-effects model was employed to assess changes in the odds of correct responses to eight items between the pre-test and post-test. A five-point scale assessed participants' degrees of certainty (DC) in their answers, and a comparison pre- and post-test was performed with a linear mixed-effects model. Satisfaction was based on Kirkpatrick's levels 1 and 2 (reaction and learning) and was assessed using categorical scales and open-ended questions. A total of 93 participants completed the trail (60% non-healthcare professionals, 36% healthcare professionals, and 4% unspecified). The odds of a correct answer were higher at post-test than at pre-test (72% vs. 51%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the odds of providing a correct answer were nearly five times higher following the activity compared to before (OR = 4.8 [95%CI 3.5 to 6.4], <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean DC was also improved from pre-test to post-test (4.43, 95%CI [4.36-4.49] vs. 4.83, 95%CI [4.80-4.86]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). All 93 participants reported being either very satisfied (89%) or satisfied (11%) with the educational tool. The tool significantly improved participants' knowledge about medication safety issues and was appreciated.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Medication Safety Adventure Trail: An Educational Intervention to Promote Public Awareness on Medication Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Flornoy-Guédon, Liliane Gschwind, Antoine Poncet, Pierre Chopard, Caroline Fonzo-Christe, Pascal Bonnabry\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy13030075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Engaging patients in medication safety is essential but remains under-addressed in hospital settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the impact of an educational intervention-the Medication Safety Adventure Trail-on medication safety knowledge and satisfaction among hospital visitors. A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention using this educational tool was conducted over five days. A booth was set up in a hospital lobby inviting all passers-by to follow a six-step trail involving riddles to solve. The experiment comprised three phases: 1. Briefing plus pre-test; 2. The trail; 3. Debriefing plus post-test. A logistic mixed-effects model was employed to assess changes in the odds of correct responses to eight items between the pre-test and post-test. A five-point scale assessed participants' degrees of certainty (DC) in their answers, and a comparison pre- and post-test was performed with a linear mixed-effects model. Satisfaction was based on Kirkpatrick's levels 1 and 2 (reaction and learning) and was assessed using categorical scales and open-ended questions. A total of 93 participants completed the trail (60% non-healthcare professionals, 36% healthcare professionals, and 4% unspecified). The odds of a correct answer were higher at post-test than at pre-test (72% vs. 51%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the odds of providing a correct answer were nearly five times higher following the activity compared to before (OR = 4.8 [95%CI 3.5 to 6.4], <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean DC was also improved from pre-test to post-test (4.43, 95%CI [4.36-4.49] vs. 4.83, 95%CI [4.80-4.86]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). All 93 participants reported being either very satisfied (89%) or satisfied (11%) with the educational tool. The tool significantly improved participants' knowledge about medication safety issues and was appreciated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

让患者参与药物安全至关重要,但在医院环境中仍未得到充分重视。本初步研究旨在评估教育干预-用药安全冒险活动-对医院访客用药安全知识和满意度的影响。使用这种教育工具进行了为期五天的准实验前后干预。在一家医院的大厅里设立了一个摊位,邀请所有的路人遵循一个包含谜语的六步路径来解决。实验分为三个阶段:简报加预试;2. 小道;3. 汇报和事后测试。采用logistic混合效应模型来评估测试前和测试后对8个项目的正确反应几率的变化。一个五分制量表评估参与者的确定性程度(DC)在他们的答案,和比较前后测试进行了线性混合效应模型。满意度是基于柯克帕特里克的1级和2级(反应和学习),并使用分类量表和开放式问题进行评估。共有93名参与者完成了试验(60%非医疗保健专业人员,36%医疗保健专业人员,4%未指定)。在测试后得到正确答案的几率比测试前高(72%对51%,p < 0.001),并且在活动后提供正确答案的几率比之前高出近5倍(OR = 4.8 [95%CI 3.5至6.4],p < 0.001)。平均DC从测试前到测试后也有所改善(4.43,95%CI [4.36-4.49] vs. 4.83, 95%CI [4.80-4.86];P < 0.001)。所有93名参与者报告对教育工具非常满意(89%)或满意(11%)。该工具显著提高了参与者对药物安全问题的认识,受到赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Medication Safety Adventure Trail: An Educational Intervention to Promote Public Awareness on Medication Safety.

The Medication Safety Adventure Trail: An Educational Intervention to Promote Public Awareness on Medication Safety.

The Medication Safety Adventure Trail: An Educational Intervention to Promote Public Awareness on Medication Safety.

The Medication Safety Adventure Trail: An Educational Intervention to Promote Public Awareness on Medication Safety.

Engaging patients in medication safety is essential but remains under-addressed in hospital settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the impact of an educational intervention-the Medication Safety Adventure Trail-on medication safety knowledge and satisfaction among hospital visitors. A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention using this educational tool was conducted over five days. A booth was set up in a hospital lobby inviting all passers-by to follow a six-step trail involving riddles to solve. The experiment comprised three phases: 1. Briefing plus pre-test; 2. The trail; 3. Debriefing plus post-test. A logistic mixed-effects model was employed to assess changes in the odds of correct responses to eight items between the pre-test and post-test. A five-point scale assessed participants' degrees of certainty (DC) in their answers, and a comparison pre- and post-test was performed with a linear mixed-effects model. Satisfaction was based on Kirkpatrick's levels 1 and 2 (reaction and learning) and was assessed using categorical scales and open-ended questions. A total of 93 participants completed the trail (60% non-healthcare professionals, 36% healthcare professionals, and 4% unspecified). The odds of a correct answer were higher at post-test than at pre-test (72% vs. 51%, p < 0.001), and the odds of providing a correct answer were nearly five times higher following the activity compared to before (OR = 4.8 [95%CI 3.5 to 6.4], p < 0.001). The mean DC was also improved from pre-test to post-test (4.43, 95%CI [4.36-4.49] vs. 4.83, 95%CI [4.80-4.86]; p < 0.001). All 93 participants reported being either very satisfied (89%) or satisfied (11%) with the educational tool. The tool significantly improved participants' knowledge about medication safety issues and was appreciated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信