保护瘤胃脂肪和保护瘤胃胆碱共同添加对生长羔羊生产性能和肉品质的影响

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Haitao Liu, Fadi Li, Fei Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Tao Wang, Qinwu Li, Xinji Wang, Kaidong Li
{"title":"保护瘤胃脂肪和保护瘤胃胆碱共同添加对生长羔羊生产性能和肉品质的影响","authors":"Haitao Liu, Fadi Li, Fei Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Tao Wang, Qinwu Li, Xinji Wang, Kaidong Li","doi":"10.3390/vetsci12060525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the effect of co-supplementing rumen-protected fat and rumen-protected choline on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in lambs. Using a randomized experimental design, 45 weaned female Tian×Hu crossbred lambs (3 months old; average body weight: 27.34 ± 0.57 kg, mean ± SD) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatment groups. The three dietary treatments were as follows: a basal diet group (CON), a group receiving 2% rumen-protected fat in place of 2% barley (RPF), and a group supplemented with 2% rumen-protected fat and 0.4% rumen-protected choline, replacing 2% barley and 0.4% corn germ in the basal diet (RPFC). Compared to the CON group, neither the RPF nor RPFC treatments resulted in significant differences in growth performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, the RPFC group showed a 5.3% increase in dry matter intake (DMI) compared to the RPF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared with the CON, the RPF treatment increased 69.23% the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but the content of C17:0, C17:1, C18:1n-9c, and iso-C18:0 in <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> was decreased by 16.49%, 15.78%, 6.45% and 27.78%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPFC treatment increased the relative abundance of C16:1 in <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPF and RPFC treatments significantly increased serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol compared to the CON group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPF treatment raised HDL by 50.00% and total cholesterol by 38.03%, while the RPFC treatment increased HDL by 39.47% and total cholesterol by 26.03%. Furthermore, compared to the RPF group, the RPFC treatment led to a 13.47% increase in the 45 min b* color value of the <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and a significant 45.45% reduction in the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t fatty acid in the same muscle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In summary, rumen-protected choline reduces the negative effects of rumen-protected fat on feed intake in lambs and changes fatty acid profile in meat.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rumen-Protected Fat and Rumen-Protected Choline Co-Supplementation: Impacts on Performance and Meat Quality of Growing Lambs.\",\"authors\":\"Haitao Liu, Fadi Li, Fei Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Tao Wang, Qinwu Li, Xinji Wang, Kaidong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vetsci12060525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the effect of co-supplementing rumen-protected fat and rumen-protected choline on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in lambs. Using a randomized experimental design, 45 weaned female Tian×Hu crossbred lambs (3 months old; average body weight: 27.34 ± 0.57 kg, mean ± SD) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatment groups. The three dietary treatments were as follows: a basal diet group (CON), a group receiving 2% rumen-protected fat in place of 2% barley (RPF), and a group supplemented with 2% rumen-protected fat and 0.4% rumen-protected choline, replacing 2% barley and 0.4% corn germ in the basal diet (RPFC). Compared to the CON group, neither the RPF nor RPFC treatments resulted in significant differences in growth performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, the RPFC group showed a 5.3% increase in dry matter intake (DMI) compared to the RPF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared with the CON, the RPF treatment increased 69.23% the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but the content of C17:0, C17:1, C18:1n-9c, and iso-C18:0 in <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> was decreased by 16.49%, 15.78%, 6.45% and 27.78%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPFC treatment increased the relative abundance of C16:1 in <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPF and RPFC treatments significantly increased serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol compared to the CON group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RPF treatment raised HDL by 50.00% and total cholesterol by 38.03%, while the RPFC treatment increased HDL by 39.47% and total cholesterol by 26.03%. Furthermore, compared to the RPF group, the RPFC treatment led to a 13.47% increase in the 45 min b* color value of the <i>Longissimus lumborum</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and a significant 45.45% reduction in the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t fatty acid in the same muscle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In summary, rumen-protected choline reduces the negative effects of rumen-protected fat on feed intake in lambs and changes fatty acid profile in meat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Sciences\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在评价共同添加保护瘤胃脂肪和保护瘤胃胆碱对羔羊生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质的影响。采用随机试验设计,选取45只断奶Tian×Hu杂交母羊(3个月大;平均体重:27.34±0.57 kg,平均±SD),随机分为3个饲粮处理组。3种饲粮处理分别为:基础饲粮组(CON)、以2%保护瘤胃脂肪代替2%大麦组(RPF)和以2%保护瘤胃脂肪和0.4%保护瘤胃胆碱代替基础饲粮中2%大麦和0.4%玉米胚芽组(RPFC)。与CON组相比,RPF和RPFC处理均未导致生长性能的显著差异(p < 0.05)。而rfc组干物质采食量(DMI)较RPF组提高5.3% (p < 0.05)。与对照相比,RPF处理使腰最长肌中C18:2n-6t的相对丰度提高了69.23% (p < 0.05),而C17:0、C17:1、C18:1n-9c和iso-C18:0的含量分别降低了16.49%、15.78%、6.45%和27.78% (p < 0.05)。RPFC处理增加了腰最长肌中C16:1的相对丰度(p < 0.05)。与CON组相比,RPF和RPFC治疗显著提高了血清高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和总胆固醇水平(p < 0.05)。RPF组HDL升高50.00%,总胆固醇升高38.03%,RPFC组HDL升高39.47%,总胆固醇升高26.03%。此外,与RPF组相比,RPFC处理导致腰最长肌45 min b*色值增加13.47% (p < 0.01),同一肌肉中C18:2n-6t脂肪酸相对丰度显著降低45.45% (p < 0.05)。综上所述,保护瘤胃胆碱降低了保护瘤胃脂肪对羔羊采食量的负面影响,改变了肉中的脂肪酸分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rumen-Protected Fat and Rumen-Protected Choline Co-Supplementation: Impacts on Performance and Meat Quality of Growing Lambs.

This study aimed to assess the effect of co-supplementing rumen-protected fat and rumen-protected choline on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in lambs. Using a randomized experimental design, 45 weaned female Tian×Hu crossbred lambs (3 months old; average body weight: 27.34 ± 0.57 kg, mean ± SD) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatment groups. The three dietary treatments were as follows: a basal diet group (CON), a group receiving 2% rumen-protected fat in place of 2% barley (RPF), and a group supplemented with 2% rumen-protected fat and 0.4% rumen-protected choline, replacing 2% barley and 0.4% corn germ in the basal diet (RPFC). Compared to the CON group, neither the RPF nor RPFC treatments resulted in significant differences in growth performance (p > 0.05). However, the RPFC group showed a 5.3% increase in dry matter intake (DMI) compared to the RPF group (p < 0.05). Compared with the CON, the RPF treatment increased 69.23% the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t (p < 0.05), but the content of C17:0, C17:1, C18:1n-9c, and iso-C18:0 in Longissimus lumborum was decreased by 16.49%, 15.78%, 6.45% and 27.78%, respectively (p < 0.05). The RPFC treatment increased the relative abundance of C16:1 in Longissimus lumborum (p < 0.05). The RPF and RPFC treatments significantly increased serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol compared to the CON group (p < 0.05). The RPF treatment raised HDL by 50.00% and total cholesterol by 38.03%, while the RPFC treatment increased HDL by 39.47% and total cholesterol by 26.03%. Furthermore, compared to the RPF group, the RPFC treatment led to a 13.47% increase in the 45 min b* color value of the Longissimus lumborum (p < 0.01) and a significant 45.45% reduction in the relative abundance of C18:2n-6t fatty acid in the same muscle (p < 0.05). In summary, rumen-protected choline reduces the negative effects of rumen-protected fat on feed intake in lambs and changes fatty acid profile in meat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信