Ching Yang Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yu Fu Wu, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Chun Ting Kuo, Ching Feng Wu
{"title":"单门机器人辅助胸外科手术的发展:对肺部解剖切除的原始和改进技术的回顾性研究。","authors":"Ching Yang Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yu Fu Wu, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Chun Ting Kuo, Ching Feng Wu","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS) has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach for lung anatomic resections. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of uRATS, comparing the original technique with a modified approach utilizing a novel trocar configuration to minimize incision size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent uRATS for lung cancer between August 2023 and August 2024 at a tertiary medical center. The first 20 cases employed a 4 cm incision with three 8 mm trocars, while the subsequent 20 cases utilized a modified technique incorporating two flared trocars and a central 8 mm trocar, reducing the incision to 3.5 cm. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean docking, console, and operative times showed no significant differences between the original and modified techniques. The mean postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were comparable. No conversions to multiport RATS, VATS, or open surgery were required. The most common complication was mild subcutaneous emphysema (5%). Learning curve analysis indicated that approximately 20 cases were needed to achieve technical proficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uRATS is a safe and feasible approach for lung anatomic resections. The modified technique with flared trocars enables a smaller incision without compromising outcomes. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term oncologic efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 12","pages":"e70085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.\",\"authors\":\"Ching Yang Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yu Fu Wu, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Chun Ting Kuo, Ching Feng Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.70085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS) has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach for lung anatomic resections. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of uRATS, comparing the original technique with a modified approach utilizing a novel trocar configuration to minimize incision size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent uRATS for lung cancer between August 2023 and August 2024 at a tertiary medical center. The first 20 cases employed a 4 cm incision with three 8 mm trocars, while the subsequent 20 cases utilized a modified technique incorporating two flared trocars and a central 8 mm trocar, reducing the incision to 3.5 cm. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean docking, console, and operative times showed no significant differences between the original and modified techniques. The mean postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were comparable. No conversions to multiport RATS, VATS, or open surgery were required. The most common complication was mild subcutaneous emphysema (5%). Learning curve analysis indicated that approximately 20 cases were needed to achieve technical proficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uRATS is a safe and feasible approach for lung anatomic resections. The modified technique with flared trocars enables a smaller incision without compromising outcomes. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term oncologic efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"e70085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolution of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Study on the Original and Modified Techniques for Lung Anatomic Resections.
Background: Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (uRATS) has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach for lung anatomic resections. This study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of uRATS, comparing the original technique with a modified approach utilizing a novel trocar configuration to minimize incision size.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent uRATS for lung cancer between August 2023 and August 2024 at a tertiary medical center. The first 20 cases employed a 4 cm incision with three 8 mm trocars, while the subsequent 20 cases utilized a modified technique incorporating two flared trocars and a central 8 mm trocar, reducing the incision to 3.5 cm. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain, and complications were analyzed.
Results: The mean docking, console, and operative times showed no significant differences between the original and modified techniques. The mean postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were comparable. No conversions to multiport RATS, VATS, or open surgery were required. The most common complication was mild subcutaneous emphysema (5%). Learning curve analysis indicated that approximately 20 cases were needed to achieve technical proficiency.
Conclusion: uRATS is a safe and feasible approach for lung anatomic resections. The modified technique with flared trocars enables a smaller incision without compromising outcomes. Further studies are warranted to assess long-term oncologic efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.