Lluís Marquès, Arantza Vega, Federico de la Roca, Carmen Domínguez, Víctor Soriano-Gomis, Teresa Alfaya, Laia Ferré-Ybarz, José-María Vega, Mario Tubella, Berta Ruiz-León
{"title":"膜翅目变态反应的分子诊断:Euroline DPA-Dx和ImmunoCAP的比较。","authors":"Lluís Marquès, Arantza Vega, Federico de la Roca, Carmen Domínguez, Víctor Soriano-Gomis, Teresa Alfaya, Laia Ferré-Ybarz, José-María Vega, Mario Tubella, Berta Ruiz-León","doi":"10.3390/toxins17060310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is contingent upon the accurate identification of the insect responsible for the allergic reaction. The techniques used to detect specific IgE suffer from difficulties due to the cross-reactivity between Hymenoptera venoms (false positives), diagnostic ability, and the limited availability of allergenic components (false negatives). In this study, we analyzed the discrepancies in the results obtained with Euroline<sup>®</sup> DPA-Dx and ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> in the diagnosis of allergic reactions due to Hymenoptera stings in 151 patients. The results (positive/negative) of ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> and Euroline<sup>®</sup> agreed in 77/151 (50.99%) cases; with 15/151 (9.93%) cases positive for the same insect, and 61/151 (40.4%) cases positive for multiple insects. When the results were used to decide which venom to use for immunotherapy, there was a statistically significant discrepancy for <i>Polistes dominula</i> (21.8% of cases with ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> compared to only 8.4% with Euroline<sup>®</sup>). The presence of <i>Polistes</i> venom phospholipase (Pol d 1) in Euroline<sup>®</sup> did not increase its ability to differentiate double sensitization to wasps. ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> and Euroline<sup>®</sup> exhibited comparable diagnostic performance in bee venom allergy. For vespid venom allergy-particularly involving <i>Polistes</i> species-ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> appeared to show a slight diagnostic advantage, although this finding should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Diagnosis in Hymenoptera Allergy: Comparison of Euroline DPA-Dx and ImmunoCAP.\",\"authors\":\"Lluís Marquès, Arantza Vega, Federico de la Roca, Carmen Domínguez, Víctor Soriano-Gomis, Teresa Alfaya, Laia Ferré-Ybarz, José-María Vega, Mario Tubella, Berta Ruiz-León\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins17060310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is contingent upon the accurate identification of the insect responsible for the allergic reaction. The techniques used to detect specific IgE suffer from difficulties due to the cross-reactivity between Hymenoptera venoms (false positives), diagnostic ability, and the limited availability of allergenic components (false negatives). In this study, we analyzed the discrepancies in the results obtained with Euroline<sup>®</sup> DPA-Dx and ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> in the diagnosis of allergic reactions due to Hymenoptera stings in 151 patients. The results (positive/negative) of ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> and Euroline<sup>®</sup> agreed in 77/151 (50.99%) cases; with 15/151 (9.93%) cases positive for the same insect, and 61/151 (40.4%) cases positive for multiple insects. When the results were used to decide which venom to use for immunotherapy, there was a statistically significant discrepancy for <i>Polistes dominula</i> (21.8% of cases with ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> compared to only 8.4% with Euroline<sup>®</sup>). The presence of <i>Polistes</i> venom phospholipase (Pol d 1) in Euroline<sup>®</sup> did not increase its ability to differentiate double sensitization to wasps. ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> and Euroline<sup>®</sup> exhibited comparable diagnostic performance in bee venom allergy. For vespid venom allergy-particularly involving <i>Polistes</i> species-ImmunoCAP<sup>®</sup> appeared to show a slight diagnostic advantage, although this finding should be interpreted with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular Diagnosis in Hymenoptera Allergy: Comparison of Euroline DPA-Dx and ImmunoCAP.
The efficacy of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is contingent upon the accurate identification of the insect responsible for the allergic reaction. The techniques used to detect specific IgE suffer from difficulties due to the cross-reactivity between Hymenoptera venoms (false positives), diagnostic ability, and the limited availability of allergenic components (false negatives). In this study, we analyzed the discrepancies in the results obtained with Euroline® DPA-Dx and ImmunoCAP® in the diagnosis of allergic reactions due to Hymenoptera stings in 151 patients. The results (positive/negative) of ImmunoCAP® and Euroline® agreed in 77/151 (50.99%) cases; with 15/151 (9.93%) cases positive for the same insect, and 61/151 (40.4%) cases positive for multiple insects. When the results were used to decide which venom to use for immunotherapy, there was a statistically significant discrepancy for Polistes dominula (21.8% of cases with ImmunoCAP® compared to only 8.4% with Euroline®). The presence of Polistes venom phospholipase (Pol d 1) in Euroline® did not increase its ability to differentiate double sensitization to wasps. ImmunoCAP® and Euroline® exhibited comparable diagnostic performance in bee venom allergy. For vespid venom allergy-particularly involving Polistes species-ImmunoCAP® appeared to show a slight diagnostic advantage, although this finding should be interpreted with caution.
期刊介绍:
Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.