{"title":"动态结构方程模型中的测量模型规格错误:功率、可靠性和其他考虑。","authors":"Hyungeun Oh, Michael D Hunter, Sy-Miin Chow","doi":"10.1080/10705511.2025.2452884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEMs) integrate multilevel modeling, time series analysis, and structural equation modeling within a Bayesian estimation framework, offering a versatile tool for analyzing intensive longitudinal data (ILD). However, the impact of measurement structure misspecification in DSEMs, especially under varying reliability conditions and model complexities, remains underexplored. Our Monte Carlo simulation revealed that omitting measurement errors when present led to severe biases in dynamic parameters regardless of reliability conditions, though power remained high. Increasing the number of participants and time points ameliorated but did not eliminate all biases. A single-indicator DSEMs with a measurement structure using composite scores showed similar performance to multiple indicators DSEMs. Empirical applications showed discrepancies in dynamic parameters based on the number of indicators and measurement structures used. Leveraging these findings, we provide design recommendations, functions for extending reliability indices from single-indicator to multiple-indicator models, and guidelines for power evaluations under different reliability conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21964,"journal":{"name":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"32 3","pages":"511-528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Model Misspecification in Dynamic Structural Equation Models: Power, Reliability, and Other Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Hyungeun Oh, Michael D Hunter, Sy-Miin Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10705511.2025.2452884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEMs) integrate multilevel modeling, time series analysis, and structural equation modeling within a Bayesian estimation framework, offering a versatile tool for analyzing intensive longitudinal data (ILD). However, the impact of measurement structure misspecification in DSEMs, especially under varying reliability conditions and model complexities, remains underexplored. Our Monte Carlo simulation revealed that omitting measurement errors when present led to severe biases in dynamic parameters regardless of reliability conditions, though power remained high. Increasing the number of participants and time points ameliorated but did not eliminate all biases. A single-indicator DSEMs with a measurement structure using composite scores showed similar performance to multiple indicators DSEMs. Empirical applications showed discrepancies in dynamic parameters based on the number of indicators and measurement structures used. Leveraging these findings, we provide design recommendations, functions for extending reliability indices from single-indicator to multiple-indicator models, and guidelines for power evaluations under different reliability conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"511-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2025.2452884\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2025.2452884","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement Model Misspecification in Dynamic Structural Equation Models: Power, Reliability, and Other Considerations.
Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEMs) integrate multilevel modeling, time series analysis, and structural equation modeling within a Bayesian estimation framework, offering a versatile tool for analyzing intensive longitudinal data (ILD). However, the impact of measurement structure misspecification in DSEMs, especially under varying reliability conditions and model complexities, remains underexplored. Our Monte Carlo simulation revealed that omitting measurement errors when present led to severe biases in dynamic parameters regardless of reliability conditions, though power remained high. Increasing the number of participants and time points ameliorated but did not eliminate all biases. A single-indicator DSEMs with a measurement structure using composite scores showed similar performance to multiple indicators DSEMs. Empirical applications showed discrepancies in dynamic parameters based on the number of indicators and measurement structures used. Leveraging these findings, we provide design recommendations, functions for extending reliability indices from single-indicator to multiple-indicator models, and guidelines for power evaluations under different reliability conditions.
期刊介绍:
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal publishes refereed scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in structural equation modeling. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, psychology, medicine, sociology, education, political science, economics, management, and business/marketing. Theoretical articles address new developments; applied articles deal with innovative structural equation modeling applications; the Teacher’s Corner provides instructional modules on aspects of structural equation modeling; book and software reviews examine new modeling information and techniques; and advertising alerts readers to new products. Comments on technical or substantive issues addressed in articles or reviews published in the journal are encouraged; comments are reviewed, and authors of the original works are invited to respond.