针对抗p26和gp45抗体的多株间接ELISA检测EIAV的比较评价。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Angela Ostuni, Raffaele Frontoso, Maria Antonietta Crudele, Lorella Barca, Mario Amati, Raffaele Boni, Jolanda De Vendel, Paolo Raimondi, Alfonso Bavoso
{"title":"针对抗p26和gp45抗体的多株间接ELISA检测EIAV的比较评价。","authors":"Angela Ostuni, Raffaele Frontoso, Maria Antonietta Crudele, Lorella Barca, Mario Amati, Raffaele Boni, Jolanda De Vendel, Paolo Raimondi, Alfonso Bavoso","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14060575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV), a lentivirus marked by considerable genetic variability, poses significant diagnostic challenges. Existing diagnostic tools encompass the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion Assay (AGID), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Western blotting (WB). ELISA and AGID mainly utilize the p26 capsid protein, often sourced from the Wyoming reference strain. To broaden the range of viral proteins and strains employed in these immunoassays, we previously developed a novel p26/double-strain gp45 indirect ELISA. In this study, we evaluated the performance of this ELISA in comparison to two commercial EIAV ELISAs using Cohen's Kappa test and Bayesian Latent Class Analysis (BLCA), a statistical method that estimates test performance without requiring a perfect reference standard. A comparison with the official classification of the sera by the Italian Veterinary Service was also performed. A total of 372 serum samples, including 96 that were positives by all three tests, were analyzed. Results from both Cohen's Kappa test and BLCA, alongside comparison with official classifications, affirm the diagnostic reliability of the two commercial ELISAs and suggest that the novel ELISA, with its enhanced antigenic diversity, could offer an accurate and reliable diagnostic option for EIAV. This novel assay enhances existing commercial ELISAs and has the potential to strengthen routine diagnostic workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of a Multistrain Indirect ELISA Targeting Anti- p26 and gp45 Antibodies for EIAV Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Ostuni, Raffaele Frontoso, Maria Antonietta Crudele, Lorella Barca, Mario Amati, Raffaele Boni, Jolanda De Vendel, Paolo Raimondi, Alfonso Bavoso\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens14060575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV), a lentivirus marked by considerable genetic variability, poses significant diagnostic challenges. Existing diagnostic tools encompass the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion Assay (AGID), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Western blotting (WB). ELISA and AGID mainly utilize the p26 capsid protein, often sourced from the Wyoming reference strain. To broaden the range of viral proteins and strains employed in these immunoassays, we previously developed a novel p26/double-strain gp45 indirect ELISA. In this study, we evaluated the performance of this ELISA in comparison to two commercial EIAV ELISAs using Cohen's Kappa test and Bayesian Latent Class Analysis (BLCA), a statistical method that estimates test performance without requiring a perfect reference standard. A comparison with the official classification of the sera by the Italian Veterinary Service was also performed. A total of 372 serum samples, including 96 that were positives by all three tests, were analyzed. Results from both Cohen's Kappa test and BLCA, alongside comparison with official classifications, affirm the diagnostic reliability of the two commercial ELISAs and suggest that the novel ELISA, with its enhanced antigenic diversity, could offer an accurate and reliable diagnostic option for EIAV. This novel assay enhances existing commercial ELISAs and has the potential to strengthen routine diagnostic workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14060575\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14060575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马传染性贫血病毒(EIAV)是一种慢病毒,具有相当大的遗传变异性,给诊断带来了重大挑战。现有的诊断工具包括琼脂凝胶免疫扩散试验(AGID),酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和Western blotting (WB)。ELISA和AGID主要利用p26衣壳蛋白,通常来自怀俄明州的参考菌株。为了扩大这些免疫分析中使用的病毒蛋白和菌株的范围,我们先前开发了一种新的p26/双株gp45间接ELISA。在本研究中,我们使用Cohen's Kappa检验和贝叶斯潜类分析(BLCA)来评估该ELISA与两种商用EIAV ELISA的性能,BLCA是一种不需要完美参考标准即可估计测试性能的统计方法。还进行了与意大利兽医服务的官方血清分类的比较。共分析了372份血清样本,其中96份在所有三项检测中均呈阳性。Cohen’s Kappa试验和BLCA的结果,以及与官方分类的比较,证实了这两种商用ELISA的诊断可靠性,并表明新型ELISA具有增强的抗原多样性,可以为EIAV提供准确可靠的诊断选择。这种新型检测方法增强了现有的商用elisa,并有可能加强常规诊断工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of a Multistrain Indirect ELISA Targeting Anti- p26 and gp45 Antibodies for EIAV Detection.

Equine Infectious Anemia Virus (EIAV), a lentivirus marked by considerable genetic variability, poses significant diagnostic challenges. Existing diagnostic tools encompass the Agar Gel Immunodiffusion Assay (AGID), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Western blotting (WB). ELISA and AGID mainly utilize the p26 capsid protein, often sourced from the Wyoming reference strain. To broaden the range of viral proteins and strains employed in these immunoassays, we previously developed a novel p26/double-strain gp45 indirect ELISA. In this study, we evaluated the performance of this ELISA in comparison to two commercial EIAV ELISAs using Cohen's Kappa test and Bayesian Latent Class Analysis (BLCA), a statistical method that estimates test performance without requiring a perfect reference standard. A comparison with the official classification of the sera by the Italian Veterinary Service was also performed. A total of 372 serum samples, including 96 that were positives by all three tests, were analyzed. Results from both Cohen's Kappa test and BLCA, alongside comparison with official classifications, affirm the diagnostic reliability of the two commercial ELISAs and suggest that the novel ELISA, with its enhanced antigenic diversity, could offer an accurate and reliable diagnostic option for EIAV. This novel assay enhances existing commercial ELISAs and has the potential to strengthen routine diagnostic workflows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信