高危中性粒细胞减少患者肺炎的性别分类分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Alva Seltmann, Karin Mayer, Corinna Hahn-Ast, Annamaria Brioli, Maria Madeleine Rüthrich, Peter Brossart, Andreas Hochhaus, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
{"title":"高危中性粒细胞减少患者肺炎的性别分类分析。","authors":"Alva Seltmann, Karin Mayer, Corinna Hahn-Ast, Annamaria Brioli, Maria Madeleine Rüthrich, Peter Brossart, Andreas Hochhaus, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal","doi":"10.1159/000546911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pneumonia is a common and serious complication during high-risk neutropenia in patients with cancer. Even though sex differences were described in patients with infectious diseases or cancer in general, sex-specific analyses for pneumonia are lacking. This exploratory study aimed to compare epidemiology and outcome of pneumonia between men and women in this high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient data were harmonized from four primary databases collected by our research group at two tertiary care centers in Germany. High-risk neutropenia was either defined by duration of neutropenia or assumed for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients who developed pneumonia associated with febrile neutropenia were stratified by sex, and their characteristics during the first observed pneumonia case were compared. Additionally, all identified causative pathogens were stratified by sex and described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 906 patients contributed 1,511 cases of high-risk neutropenia. Pneumonia occurred in 110/689 (16.0%) of cases in women and 132/822 (16.1%) of cases in men. Patient characteristics such as age, underlying disease, and risk factors like duration of neutropenia did not show significant differences. Intensive care unit treatment was needed by 15/97 (15.5%) women and 22/104 (21.2%) men, and the inhospital mortality was 5/98 (5.1%) in women and 12/113 (10.6%) in men, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Seventy-three causative pathogens were identified. Among them, Gram-positive pathogens were identified in three times as often in women (13/36 [36.1%]) than in men (5/37 [13.5%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002). In contrast, fungi were identified twice as often in men (13/37 [35.1%]) than in women (7/36 [19.4%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our exploratory study suggests that while pneumonia rates are similar in women and men, pathogen patterns differ and outcomes may be different. These findings should be verified prospectively and in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Pneumonia in Patients with High-Risk Neutropenia.\",\"authors\":\"Alva Seltmann, Karin Mayer, Corinna Hahn-Ast, Annamaria Brioli, Maria Madeleine Rüthrich, Peter Brossart, Andreas Hochhaus, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pneumonia is a common and serious complication during high-risk neutropenia in patients with cancer. Even though sex differences were described in patients with infectious diseases or cancer in general, sex-specific analyses for pneumonia are lacking. This exploratory study aimed to compare epidemiology and outcome of pneumonia between men and women in this high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient data were harmonized from four primary databases collected by our research group at two tertiary care centers in Germany. High-risk neutropenia was either defined by duration of neutropenia or assumed for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients who developed pneumonia associated with febrile neutropenia were stratified by sex, and their characteristics during the first observed pneumonia case were compared. Additionally, all identified causative pathogens were stratified by sex and described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 906 patients contributed 1,511 cases of high-risk neutropenia. Pneumonia occurred in 110/689 (16.0%) of cases in women and 132/822 (16.1%) of cases in men. Patient characteristics such as age, underlying disease, and risk factors like duration of neutropenia did not show significant differences. Intensive care unit treatment was needed by 15/97 (15.5%) women and 22/104 (21.2%) men, and the inhospital mortality was 5/98 (5.1%) in women and 12/113 (10.6%) in men, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Seventy-three causative pathogens were identified. Among them, Gram-positive pathogens were identified in three times as often in women (13/36 [36.1%]) than in men (5/37 [13.5%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002). In contrast, fungi were identified twice as often in men (13/37 [35.1%]) than in women (7/36 [19.4%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our exploratory study suggests that while pneumonia rates are similar in women and men, pathogen patterns differ and outcomes may be different. These findings should be verified prospectively and in larger cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺炎是癌症高危中性粒细胞减少患者常见且严重的并发症。尽管传染病或癌症患者的性别差异在一般情况下得到了描述,但对肺炎的性别特异性分析却缺乏。本探索性研究旨在比较这一高危队列中男性和女性肺炎的流行病学和预后。方法从德国两个三级医疗中心收集的四个主要数据库中整理患者数据。高风险中性粒细胞减少症要么由中性粒细胞减少的持续时间来定义,要么假定为自体或异体造血干细胞移植。所有合并发热性中性粒细胞减少的肺炎患者按性别分层,并比较他们在首次观察到的肺炎病例中的特征。此外,所有确定的致病病原体都按性别分层并进行了描述。结果906例患者共发生高危中性粒细胞减少1511例。肺炎发生在110/689(16.0%)的女性病例和132/822(16.1%)的男性病例中。患者的年龄、基础疾病等特征和中性粒细胞减少持续时间等危险因素无显著差异。女性15/97(15.5%)、男性22/104(21.2%)需要ICU治疗,住院死亡率女性5/98(5.1%)、男性12/113(10.6%),但该结果无统计学意义。鉴定出73种致病菌。其中,女性革兰氏阳性病原菌检出率(13/36[36.1%])是男性的3倍(5/37 [13.5%]);P < 0.001, q = 0.002)。相比之下,真菌在男性中的检出率(13/37[35.1%])是女性(7/36[19.4%])的两倍;P < 0.001, q = 0.002)。我们的探索性研究表明,尽管女性和男性的肺炎发病率相似,但病原体模式不同,结果可能不同。这些发现应该在更大的队列中进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Pneumonia in Patients with High-Risk Neutropenia.

Introduction: Pneumonia is a common and serious complication during high-risk neutropenia in patients with cancer. Even though sex differences were described in patients with infectious diseases or cancer in general, sex-specific analyses for pneumonia are lacking. This exploratory study aimed to compare epidemiology and outcome of pneumonia between men and women in this high-risk cohort.

Methods: Patient data were harmonized from four primary databases collected by our research group at two tertiary care centers in Germany. High-risk neutropenia was either defined by duration of neutropenia or assumed for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients who developed pneumonia associated with febrile neutropenia were stratified by sex, and their characteristics during the first observed pneumonia case were compared. Additionally, all identified causative pathogens were stratified by sex and described.

Results: In total, 906 patients contributed 1,511 cases of high-risk neutropenia. Pneumonia occurred in 110/689 (16.0%) of cases in women and 132/822 (16.1%) of cases in men. Patient characteristics such as age, underlying disease, and risk factors like duration of neutropenia did not show significant differences. Intensive care unit treatment was needed by 15/97 (15.5%) women and 22/104 (21.2%) men, and the inhospital mortality was 5/98 (5.1%) in women and 12/113 (10.6%) in men, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Seventy-three causative pathogens were identified. Among them, Gram-positive pathogens were identified in three times as often in women (13/36 [36.1%]) than in men (5/37 [13.5%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002). In contrast, fungi were identified twice as often in men (13/37 [35.1%]) than in women (7/36 [19.4%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002).

Conclusion: Our exploratory study suggests that while pneumonia rates are similar in women and men, pathogen patterns differ and outcomes may be different. These findings should be verified prospectively and in larger cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信