在一项多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验中,不同生活方式对体重管理服务中利拉鲁肽3.0 mg处方整合实用途径的有效性的结果(STRIVE研究)。

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Metabolites Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.3390/metabo15060398
Werd Al-Najim, Babak Dehestani, Ahmed W Al-Humadi, Danielle H Bodicoat, Dimitris Papamargaritis, Michael Lean, Barbara McGowan, David R Webb, John Ph Wilding, Melanie J Davies, Carel W le Roux
{"title":"在一项多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验中,不同生活方式对体重管理服务中利拉鲁肽3.0 mg处方整合实用途径的有效性的结果(STRIVE研究)。","authors":"Werd Al-Najim, Babak Dehestani, Ahmed W Al-Humadi, Danielle H Bodicoat, Dimitris Papamargaritis, Michael Lean, Barbara McGowan, David R Webb, John Ph Wilding, Melanie J Davies, Carel W le Roux","doi":"10.3390/metabo15060398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The STRIVE study was a multicentre, open-label, real-world clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a targeted prescribing pathway for liraglutide 3.0 mg as an adjunct to standard care versus standard care alone in people with obesity attending Specialist Weight Management Services (SWMS) in the UK and Ireland. This post hoc analysis focuses on the standard care arm to explore differences in outcomes between sites, particularly the potential impact of offering meal replacements as part of usual care. <b>Methods:</b> Participants included individuals with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² and at least one obesity-related complication who received standard care at five SWMS sites. All sites provided specialist nutrition and exercise counselling; however, only the Dublin site (n = 40) included meal replacements as part of routine care. Baseline characteristics and weight change data were compared between the Dublin and UK cohorts (n = 92) at 52 and 104 weeks. Statistical comparisons were made using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests. <b>Results:</b> At baseline, the Dublin cohort was significantly older (<i>p</i> < 0.01), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and a lower reported incidence of depression/anxiety (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the UK cohort. At week 52, the Dublin group achieved greater mean weight loss (-6.1%, SD ± 5.7%) compared to the UK cohort (-1.3%, SD ± 6.7%, n = 27, <i>p</i> < 0.01). By week 104, Dublin participants maintained a mean weight loss of -4.4% (SD ± 5.7%) while UK participants had a mean weight gain of 0.37% (SD ± 7.6%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of meal replacements as part of usual care may have contributed to the greater and sustained weight loss observed in the Dublin cohort compared to other SWMS in the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Different Lifestyle Approaches in a Multicentre, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Integrating a Pragmatic Pathway for Prescribing Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Weight Management Services (STRIVE Study).\",\"authors\":\"Werd Al-Najim, Babak Dehestani, Ahmed W Al-Humadi, Danielle H Bodicoat, Dimitris Papamargaritis, Michael Lean, Barbara McGowan, David R Webb, John Ph Wilding, Melanie J Davies, Carel W le Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/metabo15060398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The STRIVE study was a multicentre, open-label, real-world clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a targeted prescribing pathway for liraglutide 3.0 mg as an adjunct to standard care versus standard care alone in people with obesity attending Specialist Weight Management Services (SWMS) in the UK and Ireland. This post hoc analysis focuses on the standard care arm to explore differences in outcomes between sites, particularly the potential impact of offering meal replacements as part of usual care. <b>Methods:</b> Participants included individuals with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² and at least one obesity-related complication who received standard care at five SWMS sites. All sites provided specialist nutrition and exercise counselling; however, only the Dublin site (n = 40) included meal replacements as part of routine care. Baseline characteristics and weight change data were compared between the Dublin and UK cohorts (n = 92) at 52 and 104 weeks. Statistical comparisons were made using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests. <b>Results:</b> At baseline, the Dublin cohort was significantly older (<i>p</i> < 0.01), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and a lower reported incidence of depression/anxiety (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the UK cohort. At week 52, the Dublin group achieved greater mean weight loss (-6.1%, SD ± 5.7%) compared to the UK cohort (-1.3%, SD ± 6.7%, n = 27, <i>p</i> < 0.01). By week 104, Dublin participants maintained a mean weight loss of -4.4% (SD ± 5.7%) while UK participants had a mean weight gain of 0.37% (SD ± 7.6%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The integration of meal replacements as part of usual care may have contributed to the greater and sustained weight loss observed in the Dublin cohort compared to other SWMS in the UK.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolites\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060398\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15060398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:STRIVE研究是一项多中心、开放标签、真实世界的临床试验,评估利拉鲁肽3.0 mg作为标准治疗的辅助处方途径与在英国和爱尔兰参加专家体重管理服务(SWMS)的肥胖患者单独标准治疗的有效性。本事后分析侧重于标准护理组,以探讨不同地点之间结果的差异,特别是作为常规护理的一部分提供代餐的潜在影响。方法:参与者包括BMI≥35 kg/m²和至少一种肥胖相关并发症的个体,他们在五个SWMS站点接受标准治疗。所有网站都提供专业的营养和运动咨询;然而,只有都柏林地区(n = 40)将代餐作为常规护理的一部分。在52周和104周时比较都柏林组和英国组(n = 92)的基线特征和体重变化数据。采用适当的参数检验和非参数检验进行统计比较。结果:在基线时,都柏林队列的年龄明显大于英国队列(p < 0.01),高血压患病率较高(p < 0.05),抑郁/焦虑发生率较低(p < 0.05)。在第52周,与英国组(-1.3%,SD±6.7%,n = 27, p < 0.01)相比,都柏林组取得了更大的平均体重减轻(-6.1%,SD±5.7%)。到第104周,都柏林参与者的平均体重下降了-4.4% (SD±5.7%),而英国参与者的平均体重增加了0.37% (SD±7.6%)(p < 0.05)。结论:与英国其他SWMS相比,将代餐作为常规护理的一部分可能有助于在都柏林队列中观察到更大和持续的体重减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Different Lifestyle Approaches in a Multicentre, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Integrating a Pragmatic Pathway for Prescribing Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Weight Management Services (STRIVE Study).

Background/Objectives: The STRIVE study was a multicentre, open-label, real-world clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a targeted prescribing pathway for liraglutide 3.0 mg as an adjunct to standard care versus standard care alone in people with obesity attending Specialist Weight Management Services (SWMS) in the UK and Ireland. This post hoc analysis focuses on the standard care arm to explore differences in outcomes between sites, particularly the potential impact of offering meal replacements as part of usual care. Methods: Participants included individuals with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² and at least one obesity-related complication who received standard care at five SWMS sites. All sites provided specialist nutrition and exercise counselling; however, only the Dublin site (n = 40) included meal replacements as part of routine care. Baseline characteristics and weight change data were compared between the Dublin and UK cohorts (n = 92) at 52 and 104 weeks. Statistical comparisons were made using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests. Results: At baseline, the Dublin cohort was significantly older (p < 0.01), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.05), and a lower reported incidence of depression/anxiety (p < 0.05) than the UK cohort. At week 52, the Dublin group achieved greater mean weight loss (-6.1%, SD ± 5.7%) compared to the UK cohort (-1.3%, SD ± 6.7%, n = 27, p < 0.01). By week 104, Dublin participants maintained a mean weight loss of -4.4% (SD ± 5.7%) while UK participants had a mean weight gain of 0.37% (SD ± 7.6%) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The integration of meal replacements as part of usual care may have contributed to the greater and sustained weight loss observed in the Dublin cohort compared to other SWMS in the UK.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolites
Metabolites Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍: Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信