[德国眶底骨折:缺乏统一标准的跨学科治疗-多中心调查结果]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2642-2470
Christoph Holtmann, Mathias Roth, Gesine Szurman, Ulrike Grenzebach, Norbert Schrage, Christian Brinkmann, Bettina Wabbels, Burkhard Dick, Markus Kohlhaas, Gernot Freißler, Marc Schargus, Lutz Hesse, Johann Roider, Agata Anna Wykrota, Arthur Müller, Gangolf Sauder, Frank Tost, Jürgen Walther, Andreas Scheider, Mathias M Maier, Kathi Hartmann, Eckart Bertelmann, Christoph Hintschich, Markus Ladewig, Anja Eckstein, Thomas Reinhard, Michael P Schittkowski, Alexander C Rokohl, Ludwig Maximilian Heindl, Ina Sterker, Salvatore Grisanti, Giulia Renieri, Heike Maria Elflein, Tobias Brockmann, Patrizia Krauss, Karsten Hufendiek, Volker Besgen, Katja Ruediger, Jens Heichel, Arne Viestenz, Maria Borrelli, Gerd Geerling
{"title":"[德国眶底骨折:缺乏统一标准的跨学科治疗-多中心调查结果]。","authors":"Christoph Holtmann, Mathias Roth, Gesine Szurman, Ulrike Grenzebach, Norbert Schrage, Christian Brinkmann, Bettina Wabbels, Burkhard Dick, Markus Kohlhaas, Gernot Freißler, Marc Schargus, Lutz Hesse, Johann Roider, Agata Anna Wykrota, Arthur Müller, Gangolf Sauder, Frank Tost, Jürgen Walther, Andreas Scheider, Mathias M Maier, Kathi Hartmann, Eckart Bertelmann, Christoph Hintschich, Markus Ladewig, Anja Eckstein, Thomas Reinhard, Michael P Schittkowski, Alexander C Rokohl, Ludwig Maximilian Heindl, Ina Sterker, Salvatore Grisanti, Giulia Renieri, Heike Maria Elflein, Tobias Brockmann, Patrizia Krauss, Karsten Hufendiek, Volker Besgen, Katja Ruediger, Jens Heichel, Arne Viestenz, Maria Borrelli, Gerd Geerling","doi":"10.1055/a-2642-2470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgical treatment of orbital floor fractures (OFF) in Germany is performed by several subspecialties. In an emergency setting, the question of necessity and urgency of surgery is frequently answered without ophthalmological consultation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this survey was to investigate the current management of OFF in German centres with emergency care, among the members of the national oculoplastic society (Section Ophthalmoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery [SORC]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-question questionnaire was sent to the main ophthalmology departments and members of the Section for Ophthalmic Reconstructive Surgery (SORC). Open (2), semi-open/multiple choice variant with multiple choice (6) and closed/dichotomous questions were used (3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire response rate was 36.3% (37/102). Patients with OFF are treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons at 86.1% of the sites and by ear, nose and throat specialists (in some cases interdisciplinary) at 25% of the sites. When the indication for surgery was made, the orthoptic status was only carried out at 72% of the sites and preoperative imaging was carried out at 75%. At 58.3% of the sites, OFF correction was also performed without any preoperative clarification by an ophthalmologist, predominantly in cases of polytrauma. The time of surgery was between 0 and 25 days, with a median of 7 days after the accident (8 ± 6 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Germany, the initial surgical treatment of OFF is predominantly performed without prior ophthalmologic consultation and not by ophthalmologists. As early reconstruction can cause considerable individual ophthalmologic loss of function, it is important to promote interdisciplinary cooperation and, in particular, the corresponding oculoplastic care expertise in ophthalmology in order more reliably to avoid inadequate indications. The development of an interdisciplinary S2 guideline and the establishment of a national registry for orbital floor fractures appear to be urgently required to improve the quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":"927-934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orbital Floor Fractures in Germany: Interdisciplinary Care without a Uniform Standard - Results of a Multicentre Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Holtmann, Mathias Roth, Gesine Szurman, Ulrike Grenzebach, Norbert Schrage, Christian Brinkmann, Bettina Wabbels, Burkhard Dick, Markus Kohlhaas, Gernot Freißler, Marc Schargus, Lutz Hesse, Johann Roider, Agata Anna Wykrota, Arthur Müller, Gangolf Sauder, Frank Tost, Jürgen Walther, Andreas Scheider, Mathias M Maier, Kathi Hartmann, Eckart Bertelmann, Christoph Hintschich, Markus Ladewig, Anja Eckstein, Thomas Reinhard, Michael P Schittkowski, Alexander C Rokohl, Ludwig Maximilian Heindl, Ina Sterker, Salvatore Grisanti, Giulia Renieri, Heike Maria Elflein, Tobias Brockmann, Patrizia Krauss, Karsten Hufendiek, Volker Besgen, Katja Ruediger, Jens Heichel, Arne Viestenz, Maria Borrelli, Gerd Geerling\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2642-2470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgical treatment of orbital floor fractures (OFF) in Germany is performed by several subspecialties. In an emergency setting, the question of necessity and urgency of surgery is frequently answered without ophthalmological consultation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this survey was to investigate the current management of OFF in German centres with emergency care, among the members of the national oculoplastic society (Section Ophthalmoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery [SORC]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-question questionnaire was sent to the main ophthalmology departments and members of the Section for Ophthalmic Reconstructive Surgery (SORC). Open (2), semi-open/multiple choice variant with multiple choice (6) and closed/dichotomous questions were used (3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire response rate was 36.3% (37/102). Patients with OFF are treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons at 86.1% of the sites and by ear, nose and throat specialists (in some cases interdisciplinary) at 25% of the sites. When the indication for surgery was made, the orthoptic status was only carried out at 72% of the sites and preoperative imaging was carried out at 75%. At 58.3% of the sites, OFF correction was also performed without any preoperative clarification by an ophthalmologist, predominantly in cases of polytrauma. The time of surgery was between 0 and 25 days, with a median of 7 days after the accident (8 ± 6 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Germany, the initial surgical treatment of OFF is predominantly performed without prior ophthalmologic consultation and not by ophthalmologists. As early reconstruction can cause considerable individual ophthalmologic loss of function, it is important to promote interdisciplinary cooperation and, in particular, the corresponding oculoplastic care expertise in ophthalmology in order more reliably to avoid inadequate indications. The development of an interdisciplinary S2 guideline and the establishment of a national registry for orbital floor fractures appear to be urgently required to improve the quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"927-934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2642-2470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2642-2470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在德国,眼眶底骨折(OFF)的手术治疗分为几个亚专科。在紧急情况下,手术的必要性和紧迫性的问题往往没有眼科咨询回答。目的:本调查的目的是调查德国国家眼科整形学会(眼科整形和重建外科分会[SORC])成员中急诊护理中心OFF的当前管理情况。方法:对眼科主要科室及眼科重建外科(SORC)成员进行问卷调查,问卷共11题。采用了开放式(2)、半开放式/多项选择变体、多项选择题(6)和封闭式/二分题(3)。结果:问卷回复率为36.3%(37/102)。OFF患者在86.1%的地点由口腔颌面外科医生治疗,在25%的地点由耳鼻喉专科医生(在某些情况下是跨学科的)治疗。当有手术指征时,仅在72%的部位进行了正视状态检查,75%的部位进行了术前成像。在58.3%的位置,OFF矫正也在术前没有任何眼科医生的澄清下进行,主要是在多发外伤的情况下。手术时间为0 ~ 25天,中位时间为7天(8±6天)。结论:在德国,OFF的初始手术治疗主要是在没有事先眼科会诊的情况下进行的,而不是由眼科医生进行的。由于早期重建可导致相当大的个体眼科功能丧失,因此促进跨学科合作,特别是相应的眼科整形护理专业知识,以更可靠地避免适应症不充分,是非常重要的。为了提高护理质量,迫切需要制定跨学科的S2指南和建立国家眶底骨折登记处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orbital Floor Fractures in Germany: Interdisciplinary Care without a Uniform Standard - Results of a Multicentre Survey.

Objective: Surgical treatment of orbital floor fractures (OFF) in Germany is performed by several subspecialties. In an emergency setting, the question of necessity and urgency of surgery is frequently answered without ophthalmological consultation.

Purpose: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current management of OFF in German centres with emergency care, among the members of the national oculoplastic society (Section Ophthalmoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery [SORC]).

Methods: An 11-question questionnaire was sent to the main ophthalmology departments and members of the Section for Ophthalmic Reconstructive Surgery (SORC). Open (2), semi-open/multiple choice variant with multiple choice (6) and closed/dichotomous questions were used (3).

Results: The questionnaire response rate was 36.3% (37/102). Patients with OFF are treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons at 86.1% of the sites and by ear, nose and throat specialists (in some cases interdisciplinary) at 25% of the sites. When the indication for surgery was made, the orthoptic status was only carried out at 72% of the sites and preoperative imaging was carried out at 75%. At 58.3% of the sites, OFF correction was also performed without any preoperative clarification by an ophthalmologist, predominantly in cases of polytrauma. The time of surgery was between 0 and 25 days, with a median of 7 days after the accident (8 ± 6 days).

Conclusions: In Germany, the initial surgical treatment of OFF is predominantly performed without prior ophthalmologic consultation and not by ophthalmologists. As early reconstruction can cause considerable individual ophthalmologic loss of function, it is important to promote interdisciplinary cooperation and, in particular, the corresponding oculoplastic care expertise in ophthalmology in order more reliably to avoid inadequate indications. The development of an interdisciplinary S2 guideline and the establishment of a national registry for orbital floor fractures appear to be urgently required to improve the quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信