自体富血小板血浆和凝胶增强颞筋膜鼓室成形术的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nejc Steiner, Domen Vozel, Nina Bozanic Urbancic, Kaja Troha, Andraz Lazar, Veronika Kralj-Iglic, Saba Battelino
{"title":"自体富血小板血浆和凝胶增强颞筋膜鼓室成形术的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Nejc Steiner, Domen Vozel, Nina Bozanic Urbancic, Kaja Troha, Andraz Lazar, Veronika Kralj-Iglic, Saba Battelino","doi":"10.3390/jpm15060233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to investigate the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich gel (PRG) on tympanic membrane closure rates, hearing improvement, and quality of life following tympanoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-two patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations were enrolled in a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single tertiary referral center. All patients underwent tympanoplasty using a temporalis fascia graft and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received standard tympanoplasty alone, while the other received intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG, in addition to the standard procedure. <b>Results:</b> The PRP group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of complete tympanic membrane closure compared to the control group (32/36; 88.9% vs. 24/36; 66.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Bone conduction hearing remained unchanged in both groups, while air conduction hearing improved significantly from pre- to post-treatment in each group. However, the difference in air conduction improvement between the PRP group and the control group was not statistically significant (PRP group: Mdn = -8.25; control group: Mdn = -12.20; U = 618; z = -0.54; <i>p</i> = 0.30). Quality of life improved in both the PRP and control groups; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (PRP group: 10.44 ± 10.46; control group: 10.47 ± 8.22; 95% CI [-4.45; 4.40]; <i>t</i>(66) = -0.01; <i>p</i> = 0.16). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG may improve tympanoplasty outcomes, particularly in cases with lower expected success rates or when performing minimally invasive transcanal procedures under local anesthesia. However, variability in PRP preparation, application methods, and graft materials across studies limits direct comparisons. Standardized protocols and further controlled studies are necessary to clarify PRP's clinical value in tympanoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the Outcomes of Temporalis Fascia Tympanoplasty Using Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Gel: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nejc Steiner, Domen Vozel, Nina Bozanic Urbancic, Kaja Troha, Andraz Lazar, Veronika Kralj-Iglic, Saba Battelino\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15060233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to investigate the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich gel (PRG) on tympanic membrane closure rates, hearing improvement, and quality of life following tympanoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-two patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations were enrolled in a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single tertiary referral center. All patients underwent tympanoplasty using a temporalis fascia graft and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received standard tympanoplasty alone, while the other received intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG, in addition to the standard procedure. <b>Results:</b> The PRP group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of complete tympanic membrane closure compared to the control group (32/36; 88.9% vs. 24/36; 66.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Bone conduction hearing remained unchanged in both groups, while air conduction hearing improved significantly from pre- to post-treatment in each group. However, the difference in air conduction improvement between the PRP group and the control group was not statistically significant (PRP group: Mdn = -8.25; control group: Mdn = -12.20; U = 618; z = -0.54; <i>p</i> = 0.30). Quality of life improved in both the PRP and control groups; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (PRP group: 10.44 ± 10.46; control group: 10.47 ± 8.22; 95% CI [-4.45; 4.40]; <i>t</i>(66) = -0.01; <i>p</i> = 0.16). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG may improve tympanoplasty outcomes, particularly in cases with lower expected success rates or when performing minimally invasive transcanal procedures under local anesthesia. However, variability in PRP preparation, application methods, and graft materials across studies limits direct comparisons. Standardized protocols and further controlled studies are necessary to clarify PRP's clinical value in tympanoplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15060233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15060233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板凝胶(PRG)对鼓室成形术后鼓膜闭合率、听力改善和生活质量的影响。方法:72例慢性鼓膜穿孔患者在单一三级转诊中心进行双盲、随机对照试验。所有患者均使用颞筋膜移植物进行鼓室成形术,并随机分为两组:一组单独接受标准鼓室成形术,另一组在标准程序的基础上接受术中自体PRP和PRG的应用。结果:PRP组鼓膜完全闭合率明显高于对照组(32/36;88.9% vs. 24/36;66.7%;P < 0.05)。两组骨传导听力均无变化,而空气传导听力在治疗前后均有显著改善。但PRP组与对照组在空气传导改善方面差异无统计学意义(PRP组:Mdn = -8.25;对照组:Mdn = -12.20;U = 618;Z = -0.54;P = 0.30)。PRP组和对照组的生活质量均有改善;但两组间差异无统计学意义(PRP组:10.44±10.46;对照组:10.47±8.22;95% ci [-4.45;4.40);T (66) = -0.01;P = 0.16)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,术中应用自体PRP和PRG可以改善鼓室成形术的结果,特别是在预期成功率较低的病例或在局部麻醉下进行微创经鼻手术时。然而,研究中PRP制备、应用方法和接枝材料的可变性限制了直接比较。需要标准化的方案和进一步的对照研究来阐明PRP在鼓室成形术中的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing the Outcomes of Temporalis Fascia Tympanoplasty Using Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Gel: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich gel (PRG) on tympanic membrane closure rates, hearing improvement, and quality of life following tympanoplasty. Methods: Seventy-two patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations were enrolled in a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single tertiary referral center. All patients underwent tympanoplasty using a temporalis fascia graft and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received standard tympanoplasty alone, while the other received intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG, in addition to the standard procedure. Results: The PRP group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of complete tympanic membrane closure compared to the control group (32/36; 88.9% vs. 24/36; 66.7%; p < 0.05). Bone conduction hearing remained unchanged in both groups, while air conduction hearing improved significantly from pre- to post-treatment in each group. However, the difference in air conduction improvement between the PRP group and the control group was not statistically significant (PRP group: Mdn = -8.25; control group: Mdn = -12.20; U = 618; z = -0.54; p = 0.30). Quality of life improved in both the PRP and control groups; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (PRP group: 10.44 ± 10.46; control group: 10.47 ± 8.22; 95% CI [-4.45; 4.40]; t(66) = -0.01; p = 0.16). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that intraoperative application of autologous PRP and PRG may improve tympanoplasty outcomes, particularly in cases with lower expected success rates or when performing minimally invasive transcanal procedures under local anesthesia. However, variability in PRP preparation, application methods, and graft materials across studies limits direct comparisons. Standardized protocols and further controlled studies are necessary to clarify PRP's clinical value in tympanoplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信