FDA的见解:实施评估药物诱导QTc延长的新策略。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yanyan Ji, Lars Johannesen, Christine Garnett
{"title":"FDA的见解:实施评估药物诱导QTc延长的新策略。","authors":"Yanyan Ji, Lars Johannesen, Christine Garnett","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09985-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The questions and answers (Q&A) document for ICH E14/S7B provides the following advancements for QTc assessment: concentration-QTc modeling (C-QTc) as the primary analysis, accepting alternative approaches (Q&A 5.1 and 6.1) to thorough QT (TQT) studies, and incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment as supporting evidence. Based on QT study reports reviewed by the FDA between 2016 and 2024, changes to the E14 guideline have resulted in a 34% decrease in the proportion of TQT studies, while the use of C-QTc analysis as the primary analysis has significantly increased. Studies using C-QTc instead of by-time analysis as the primary analysis reduced median sample sizes by 67%, 42%, and 35% for parallel, nested crossover, and crossover studies, respectively. The white paper C-QTc model was used for 60% of drugs that prolonged the QTc interval. From 2020 to 2024, reviews incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment have also increased. The advancements in QTc assessments have streamlined QTc assessment and made clinical trials less resource-intensive. As the advancements continue to evolve the drug safety evaluation is likely to become even more adaptive and enable more precise and targeted QTc assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 4","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA's insights: implementing new strategies for evaluating drug-induced QTc prolongation.\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Ji, Lars Johannesen, Christine Garnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10928-025-09985-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The questions and answers (Q&A) document for ICH E14/S7B provides the following advancements for QTc assessment: concentration-QTc modeling (C-QTc) as the primary analysis, accepting alternative approaches (Q&A 5.1 and 6.1) to thorough QT (TQT) studies, and incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment as supporting evidence. Based on QT study reports reviewed by the FDA between 2016 and 2024, changes to the E14 guideline have resulted in a 34% decrease in the proportion of TQT studies, while the use of C-QTc analysis as the primary analysis has significantly increased. Studies using C-QTc instead of by-time analysis as the primary analysis reduced median sample sizes by 67%, 42%, and 35% for parallel, nested crossover, and crossover studies, respectively. The white paper C-QTc model was used for 60% of drugs that prolonged the QTc interval. From 2020 to 2024, reviews incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment have also increased. The advancements in QTc assessments have streamlined QTc assessment and made clinical trials less resource-intensive. As the advancements continue to evolve the drug safety evaluation is likely to become even more adaptive and enable more precise and targeted QTc assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-025-09985-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-025-09985-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ICH E14/S7B的问答(Q&A)文件提供了QTc评估的以下进展:浓度-QTc建模(C-QTc)作为主要分析,接受替代方法(Q&A 5.1和6.1)以彻底的QT (TQT)研究,并纳入综合非临床风险评估作为支持证据。根据FDA在2016年至2024年间审查的QT研究报告,E14指南的变化导致TQT研究的比例下降了34%,而使用C-QTc分析作为主要分析的比例显著增加。使用C-QTc代替按时间分析作为主要分析的研究,在平行研究、嵌套交叉研究和交叉研究中,中位样本量分别减少了67%、42%和35%。60%延长QTc间期的药物采用白皮书C-QTc模型。从2020年到2024年,纳入综合非临床风险评估的审查也有所增加。QTc评估的进步简化了QTc评估,减少了临床试验的资源密集程度。随着技术的不断进步,药物安全性评价可能会变得更具适应性,并使QTc评估更加精确和有针对性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDA's insights: implementing new strategies for evaluating drug-induced QTc prolongation.

The questions and answers (Q&A) document for ICH E14/S7B provides the following advancements for QTc assessment: concentration-QTc modeling (C-QTc) as the primary analysis, accepting alternative approaches (Q&A 5.1 and 6.1) to thorough QT (TQT) studies, and incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment as supporting evidence. Based on QT study reports reviewed by the FDA between 2016 and 2024, changes to the E14 guideline have resulted in a 34% decrease in the proportion of TQT studies, while the use of C-QTc analysis as the primary analysis has significantly increased. Studies using C-QTc instead of by-time analysis as the primary analysis reduced median sample sizes by 67%, 42%, and 35% for parallel, nested crossover, and crossover studies, respectively. The white paper C-QTc model was used for 60% of drugs that prolonged the QTc interval. From 2020 to 2024, reviews incorporating an integrated nonclinical risk assessment have also increased. The advancements in QTc assessments have streamlined QTc assessment and made clinical trials less resource-intensive. As the advancements continue to evolve the drug safety evaluation is likely to become even more adaptive and enable more precise and targeted QTc assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Broadly speaking, the Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics covers the area of pharmacometrics. The journal is devoted to illustrating the importance of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacometrics in drug development, clinical care, and the understanding of drug action. The journal publishes on a variety of topics related to pharmacometrics, including, but not limited to, clinical, experimental, and theoretical papers examining the kinetics of drug disposition and effects of drug action in humans, animals, in vitro, or in silico; modeling and simulation methodology, including optimal design; precision medicine; systems pharmacology; and mathematical pharmacology (including computational biology, bioengineering, and biophysics related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, orpharmacodynamics). Clinical papers that include population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships are welcome. The journal actively invites and promotes up-and-coming areas of pharmacometric research, such as real-world evidence, quality of life analyses, and artificial intelligence. The Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics is an official journal of the International Society of Pharmacometrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信