3d打印羟基磷灰石-聚乳酸骨再生支架体外生物学性能评估

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Eddy Shan, Cristina Chamorro, Ana Ferrández-Montero, Rosa M Martin-Rodriguez, Begoña Ferrari, Antonio Javier Sanchez-Herencia, Leire Virto, María José Marín, Elena Figuero, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"3d打印羟基磷灰石-聚乳酸骨再生支架体外生物学性能评估","authors":"Eddy Shan, Cristina Chamorro, Ana Ferrández-Montero, Rosa M Martin-Rodriguez, Begoña Ferrari, Antonio Javier Sanchez-Herencia, Leire Virto, María José Marín, Elena Figuero, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.3390/jfb16060218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the biological performance in vitro of two 3D-printed hydroxyapatite (HA) and polylactic acid (PLA) composite scaffolds with two different infill densities (50% [HA-PLA50] and 70% [HA-PLA70]). Comparative analysis using MG-63 cell cultures evaluated the following: (1) integrity after exposure to various sterilization methods; (2) cell viability; (3) morphological characteristics; (4) cell proliferation; (5) cytotoxicity; (6) gene expression; and (7) protein synthesis. Ultraviolet radiation was the preferred sterilization method. Both scaffolds maintained adequate cell viability and proliferation over 7 days without significant differences in cytotoxicity. Notably, HA-PLA50 scaffolds demonstrated superior osteogenic potential, showing a significantly higher expression of collagen type I (COL1A1) and an increased synthesis of interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6, IL-8) compared to HA-PLA70 scaffolds. While both scaffold types supported robust cell growth, the HA-PLA50 formulation exhibited enhanced bioactivity, suggesting a potential advantage for bone tissue engineering applications. These findings provide important insights for optimizing 3D-printed bone graft substitutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Biological Properties Assessment of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Intended for Bone Regeneration.\",\"authors\":\"Eddy Shan, Cristina Chamorro, Ana Ferrández-Montero, Rosa M Martin-Rodriguez, Begoña Ferrari, Antonio Javier Sanchez-Herencia, Leire Virto, María José Marín, Elena Figuero, Mariano Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfb16060218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the biological performance in vitro of two 3D-printed hydroxyapatite (HA) and polylactic acid (PLA) composite scaffolds with two different infill densities (50% [HA-PLA50] and 70% [HA-PLA70]). Comparative analysis using MG-63 cell cultures evaluated the following: (1) integrity after exposure to various sterilization methods; (2) cell viability; (3) morphological characteristics; (4) cell proliferation; (5) cytotoxicity; (6) gene expression; and (7) protein synthesis. Ultraviolet radiation was the preferred sterilization method. Both scaffolds maintained adequate cell viability and proliferation over 7 days without significant differences in cytotoxicity. Notably, HA-PLA50 scaffolds demonstrated superior osteogenic potential, showing a significantly higher expression of collagen type I (COL1A1) and an increased synthesis of interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6, IL-8) compared to HA-PLA70 scaffolds. While both scaffold types supported robust cell growth, the HA-PLA50 formulation exhibited enhanced bioactivity, suggesting a potential advantage for bone tissue engineering applications. These findings provide important insights for optimizing 3D-printed bone graft substitutes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16060218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16060218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了两种不同填充密度(50% [HA- pla50]和70% [HA- pla70])的3d打印羟基磷灰石(HA)和聚乳酸(PLA)复合支架的体外生物学性能。MG-63细胞培养物的对比分析评估了以下方面:(1)暴露于各种灭菌方法后的完整性;(2)细胞活力;(3)形态特征;(4)细胞增殖;(5)细胞毒性;(6)基因表达;(7)蛋白质合成。紫外线是首选的灭菌方法。两种支架在7天内保持足够的细胞活力和增殖,细胞毒性无显著差异。值得注意的是,HA-PLA50支架显示出优越的成骨潜力,与HA-PLA70支架相比,其I型胶原(COL1A1)的表达显著增加,白细胞介素6和8 (IL-6, IL-8)的合成增加。虽然两种支架类型都支持稳健的细胞生长,但HA-PLA50制剂表现出增强的生物活性,这表明在骨组织工程应用方面具有潜在的优势。这些发现为优化3d打印骨移植替代物提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Biological Properties Assessment of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Polylactic Acid Scaffolds Intended for Bone Regeneration.

This study evaluated the biological performance in vitro of two 3D-printed hydroxyapatite (HA) and polylactic acid (PLA) composite scaffolds with two different infill densities (50% [HA-PLA50] and 70% [HA-PLA70]). Comparative analysis using MG-63 cell cultures evaluated the following: (1) integrity after exposure to various sterilization methods; (2) cell viability; (3) morphological characteristics; (4) cell proliferation; (5) cytotoxicity; (6) gene expression; and (7) protein synthesis. Ultraviolet radiation was the preferred sterilization method. Both scaffolds maintained adequate cell viability and proliferation over 7 days without significant differences in cytotoxicity. Notably, HA-PLA50 scaffolds demonstrated superior osteogenic potential, showing a significantly higher expression of collagen type I (COL1A1) and an increased synthesis of interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6, IL-8) compared to HA-PLA70 scaffolds. While both scaffold types supported robust cell growth, the HA-PLA50 formulation exhibited enhanced bioactivity, suggesting a potential advantage for bone tissue engineering applications. These findings provide important insights for optimizing 3D-printed bone graft substitutes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信