癫痫的个性化反应性神经刺激。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vikram R Rao
{"title":"癫痫的个性化反应性神经刺激。","authors":"Vikram R Rao","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Over the past 20 years, responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop device for treating certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, has become ensconced in the epileptologist's therapeutic armamentarium. Through neuromodulatory effects, RNS therapy gradually reduces seizures over years, providing diagnostically valuable intracranial recordings along the way. However, the neuromodulatory potential of RNS therapy has not been fully harnessed. Seizure reduction is often slow, outcomes vary across individuals and defy prognostication, seizure freedom is uncommon, and many patients do not derive significant benefit. These limitations may stem from the \"black box\" nature of RNS therapy. The antiseizure mechanism(s) of RNS remain poorly understood, and, in the absence of first principles to inform selection of the candidates most likely to benefit, the ideal brain regions to target, and the most effective stimulation parameters, contemporary use of RNS therapy is largely empiric. Fortunately, recent advances in neuroimaging, neurophysiology, artificial intelligence, and engineering have made the goal of rational, personalized neurostimulation a near-term reality. Here, we review recent progress toward this goal, focusing on novel approaches to patient selection, brain network topology, state-dependent effects, and stimulation parameter optimization. By considering the who, where, when, and how of RNS, we highlight emerging paradigm shifts that will help usher in a new age of RNS therapy that is more personalized and more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalizing Responsive Neurostimulation for Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Vikram R Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Over the past 20 years, responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop device for treating certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, has become ensconced in the epileptologist's therapeutic armamentarium. Through neuromodulatory effects, RNS therapy gradually reduces seizures over years, providing diagnostically valuable intracranial recordings along the way. However, the neuromodulatory potential of RNS therapy has not been fully harnessed. Seizure reduction is often slow, outcomes vary across individuals and defy prognostication, seizure freedom is uncommon, and many patients do not derive significant benefit. These limitations may stem from the \\\"black box\\\" nature of RNS therapy. The antiseizure mechanism(s) of RNS remain poorly understood, and, in the absence of first principles to inform selection of the candidates most likely to benefit, the ideal brain regions to target, and the most effective stimulation parameters, contemporary use of RNS therapy is largely empiric. Fortunately, recent advances in neuroimaging, neurophysiology, artificial intelligence, and engineering have made the goal of rational, personalized neurostimulation a near-term reality. Here, we review recent progress toward this goal, focusing on novel approaches to patient selection, brain network topology, state-dependent effects, and stimulation parameter optimization. By considering the who, where, when, and how of RNS, we highlight emerging paradigm shifts that will help usher in a new age of RNS therapy that is more personalized and more effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在过去的20年里,反应性神经刺激(RNS),一种用于治疗某些形式的耐药局灶性癫痫的闭环装置,已经成为癫痫学家的治疗设备。通过神经调节作用,RNS治疗多年来逐渐减少癫痫发作,在此过程中提供了有诊断价值的颅内记录。然而,RNS疗法的神经调节潜能尚未得到充分利用。癫痫发作的减少往往是缓慢的,结果因人而异,难以预测,癫痫发作自由是罕见的,许多患者没有得到显著的好处。这些限制可能源于RNS疗法的“黑箱”性质。RNS的抗癫痫机制仍然知之甚少,而且,由于缺乏第一流的原则来选择最有可能受益的候选人,理想的大脑区域,以及最有效的刺激参数,RNS治疗的当代使用在很大程度上是经经验的。幸运的是,神经影像学、神经生理学、人工智能和工程学的最新进展已经使理性、个性化的神经刺激成为近期的现实。在此,我们回顾了这一目标的最新进展,重点关注患者选择,大脑网络拓扑,状态依赖效应和刺激参数优化的新方法。通过考虑RNS的对象、地点、时间和方式,我们强调了新兴的范式转变,这将有助于迎来一个更个性化、更有效的RNS治疗的新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalizing Responsive Neurostimulation for Epilepsy.

Summary: Over the past 20 years, responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop device for treating certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, has become ensconced in the epileptologist's therapeutic armamentarium. Through neuromodulatory effects, RNS therapy gradually reduces seizures over years, providing diagnostically valuable intracranial recordings along the way. However, the neuromodulatory potential of RNS therapy has not been fully harnessed. Seizure reduction is often slow, outcomes vary across individuals and defy prognostication, seizure freedom is uncommon, and many patients do not derive significant benefit. These limitations may stem from the "black box" nature of RNS therapy. The antiseizure mechanism(s) of RNS remain poorly understood, and, in the absence of first principles to inform selection of the candidates most likely to benefit, the ideal brain regions to target, and the most effective stimulation parameters, contemporary use of RNS therapy is largely empiric. Fortunately, recent advances in neuroimaging, neurophysiology, artificial intelligence, and engineering have made the goal of rational, personalized neurostimulation a near-term reality. Here, we review recent progress toward this goal, focusing on novel approaches to patient selection, brain network topology, state-dependent effects, and stimulation parameter optimization. By considering the who, where, when, and how of RNS, we highlight emerging paradigm shifts that will help usher in a new age of RNS therapy that is more personalized and more effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信