不同纤维放置技术对直接树脂复合材料修复前磨牙抗断性影响的体外研究。

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Reham Hesham Ibrahim, Dina Wafik ElKassas, Sameh Mahmoud Nabih, Mennatallah Naguib Salem, Rasha Haridy
{"title":"不同纤维放置技术对直接树脂复合材料修复前磨牙抗断性影响的体外研究。","authors":"Reham Hesham Ibrahim, Dina Wafik ElKassas, Sameh Mahmoud Nabih, Mennatallah Naguib Salem, Rasha Haridy","doi":"10.3390/jfb16060225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) are recognized for enhancing the fracture resistance of structurally compromised teeth. However, the optimal orientation and placement of fibers in direct resin composite restorations remain under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored using polyethylene fibers with different placement techniques, compared to conventional incremental composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty intact maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10). Group 1: intact teeth (positive control); Group 2: MOD cavity without restoration (negative control); Group 3: MOD cavity restored with nanohybrid composite using the incremental technique; Group 4: polyethylene fiber placed on the pulpal floor; Group 5: fiber placed circumferentially along cavity walls (wall-papering technique); Group 6: fiber placed buccolingually in an occlusal groove (occlusal splinting). Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 6 (occlusal splinting) exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1137.72 ± 316.20 N), significantly exceeding Group 3 (546.93 ± 59.89 N) and other fiber-reinforced groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Failure mode analysis revealed no significant differences between the fiber-reinforced groups and the intact teeth. Group 6 also had the highest percentage of restorable fractures (90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating polyethylene fibers, especially through occlusal splinting, significantly improves fracture resistance in MOD-restored maxillary premolars. This technique may offer a promising alternative to conventional composite restorations in structurally weakened posterior teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Different Fiber Placement Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars Restored with Direct Resin Composite, In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Reham Hesham Ibrahim, Dina Wafik ElKassas, Sameh Mahmoud Nabih, Mennatallah Naguib Salem, Rasha Haridy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfb16060225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) are recognized for enhancing the fracture resistance of structurally compromised teeth. However, the optimal orientation and placement of fibers in direct resin composite restorations remain under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored using polyethylene fibers with different placement techniques, compared to conventional incremental composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty intact maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10). Group 1: intact teeth (positive control); Group 2: MOD cavity without restoration (negative control); Group 3: MOD cavity restored with nanohybrid composite using the incremental technique; Group 4: polyethylene fiber placed on the pulpal floor; Group 5: fiber placed circumferentially along cavity walls (wall-papering technique); Group 6: fiber placed buccolingually in an occlusal groove (occlusal splinting). Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 6 (occlusal splinting) exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1137.72 ± 316.20 N), significantly exceeding Group 3 (546.93 ± 59.89 N) and other fiber-reinforced groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Failure mode analysis revealed no significant differences between the fiber-reinforced groups and the intact teeth. Group 6 also had the highest percentage of restorable fractures (90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating polyethylene fibers, especially through occlusal splinting, significantly improves fracture resistance in MOD-restored maxillary premolars. This technique may offer a promising alternative to conventional composite restorations in structurally weakened posterior teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16060225\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16060225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纤维增强复合材料(FRCs)被认为可以增强结构受损牙齿的抗断裂能力。然而,在直接树脂复合修复中纤维的最佳取向和放置仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估不同放置技术的聚乙烯纤维修复上颌前磨牙中牙合远端(MOD)腔的抗骨折性,并与传统的增量复合修复进行比较。方法:60颗完整上颌前磨牙随机分为6组(n = 10)。第一组:完整牙(阳性对照);组2:未修复MOD空腔(阴性对照);第三组:采用增量法修复纳米复合材料模腔;第4组:聚乙烯纤维放置于牙髓底;第五组:纤维沿空腔壁周向放置(墙纸技术);第六组:将纤维以咬合方式置于咬合槽内(咬合夹板)。使用万能试验机评估断裂抗力。并对失效模式进行了分析。结果:第6组(咬合夹板)抗骨折强度最高(1137.72±316.20 N),显著高于第3组(546.93±59.89 N)及其他纤维增强组(p < 0.05)。失效模式分析显示纤维增强组与完整牙组之间无显著差异。第6组骨折可修复率最高(90%)。结论:应用聚乙烯纤维,特别是通过咬合夹板,可以显著提高mod修复的上颌前磨牙的抗骨折能力。该技术为结构薄弱的后牙提供了一种替代传统复合修复的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Different Fiber Placement Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars Restored with Direct Resin Composite, In Vitro Study.

Fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) are recognized for enhancing the fracture resistance of structurally compromised teeth. However, the optimal orientation and placement of fibers in direct resin composite restorations remain under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored using polyethylene fibers with different placement techniques, compared to conventional incremental composite restoration.

Methods: Sixty intact maxillary premolars were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10). Group 1: intact teeth (positive control); Group 2: MOD cavity without restoration (negative control); Group 3: MOD cavity restored with nanohybrid composite using the incremental technique; Group 4: polyethylene fiber placed on the pulpal floor; Group 5: fiber placed circumferentially along cavity walls (wall-papering technique); Group 6: fiber placed buccolingually in an occlusal groove (occlusal splinting). Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was also analyzed.

Results: Group 6 (occlusal splinting) exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1137.72 ± 316.20 N), significantly exceeding Group 3 (546.93 ± 59.89 N) and other fiber-reinforced groups (p < 0.05). Failure mode analysis revealed no significant differences between the fiber-reinforced groups and the intact teeth. Group 6 also had the highest percentage of restorable fractures (90%).

Conclusions: Incorporating polyethylene fibers, especially through occlusal splinting, significantly improves fracture resistance in MOD-restored maxillary premolars. This technique may offer a promising alternative to conventional composite restorations in structurally weakened posterior teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信