大环内酯类药物耐药时代的生殖支原体治疗策略:来自英格兰西北部多中心审计的结果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Izuchukwu Ezeh, Bethany Harrison, Eva Klesnik-Edwards, Alisha Varia, Emily Clarke, Vincent Lee
{"title":"大环内酯类药物耐药时代的生殖支原体治疗策略:来自英格兰西北部多中心审计的结果。","authors":"Izuchukwu Ezeh, Bethany Harrison, Eva Klesnik-Edwards, Alisha Varia, Emily Clarke, Vincent Lee","doi":"10.1177/09564624251353583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAzithromycin is first-line for uncomplicated <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> (Mgen) treatment in UK and European guidelines, however the rates of azithromycin resistance have increased significantly in recent years leading to higher rates of treatment failure. This study aims to review the disease epidemiology to guide service improvement.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective case note review of 1036 persons treated for Mgen over 1067 Mgen-related attendances. We obtained data on demographics, site(s) of infection, antibiotic resistance, treatment regimen received and results of test of cure.Results71.1% (<i>n</i> = 759) patients received the recommended first-line regimen of doxycycline and azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is the recommended first-line management for macrolide-resistant or complicated infection. 15% (<i>n</i> = 155) patients received moxifloxacin alone as first-line treatment, and 6.9% (<i>n</i> = 72) patients received doxycycline and moxifloxacin dual therapy. 72.9% (<i>n</i> = 753) samples were successfully tested for macrolide resistance. Of these, 55.5% (<i>n</i> = 418) showed macrolide resistance. 20.6% (<i>n</i> = 7) showed fluoroquinolone resistance.ConclusionsResistance data show a macrolide resistance rate of 55.5% across our region, and at least 1 in 10 persons were inappropriately screened for Mgen. We propose a multi-pronged approach which includes strict adherence to testing criteria, local resistance testing, resistance-guided management as well as innovative approaches to improve test of cure rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"9564624251353583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> treatment strategies in the era of significant macrolide resistance: Findings from a multi-centre audit in Northwest England.\",\"authors\":\"Izuchukwu Ezeh, Bethany Harrison, Eva Klesnik-Edwards, Alisha Varia, Emily Clarke, Vincent Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09564624251353583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionAzithromycin is first-line for uncomplicated <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> (Mgen) treatment in UK and European guidelines, however the rates of azithromycin resistance have increased significantly in recent years leading to higher rates of treatment failure. This study aims to review the disease epidemiology to guide service improvement.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective case note review of 1036 persons treated for Mgen over 1067 Mgen-related attendances. We obtained data on demographics, site(s) of infection, antibiotic resistance, treatment regimen received and results of test of cure.Results71.1% (<i>n</i> = 759) patients received the recommended first-line regimen of doxycycline and azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is the recommended first-line management for macrolide-resistant or complicated infection. 15% (<i>n</i> = 155) patients received moxifloxacin alone as first-line treatment, and 6.9% (<i>n</i> = 72) patients received doxycycline and moxifloxacin dual therapy. 72.9% (<i>n</i> = 753) samples were successfully tested for macrolide resistance. Of these, 55.5% (<i>n</i> = 418) showed macrolide resistance. 20.6% (<i>n</i> = 7) showed fluoroquinolone resistance.ConclusionsResistance data show a macrolide resistance rate of 55.5% across our region, and at least 1 in 10 persons were inappropriately screened for Mgen. We propose a multi-pronged approach which includes strict adherence to testing criteria, local resistance testing, resistance-guided management as well as innovative approaches to improve test of cure rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9564624251353583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251353583\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251353583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国和欧洲指南中,阿奇霉素是治疗无并发症生殖支原体(Mgen)的一线药物,然而近年来阿奇霉素耐药率显著增加,导致治疗失败率上升。本研究旨在回顾疾病流行病学,以指导服务的改进。方法:我们对1036例Mgen患者进行了回顾性病例回顾,共1067例Mgen相关就诊。结果71.1% (n = 759)的患者接受了多西环素和阿奇霉素推荐的一线治疗方案。莫西沙星是大环内酯耐药或并发症感染的首选治疗方法。15% (n = 155)的患者接受莫西沙星单用一线治疗,6.9% (n = 72)的患者接受强力霉素和莫西沙星双用治疗。72.9% (n = 753)样品成功检测大环内酯类药物耐药性。其中,55.5% (n = 418)出现大环内酯类药物耐药性。20.6% (n = 7)对氟喹诺酮类药物耐药。结论耐药数据显示,本地区大环内酯类药物耐药率为55.5%,每10人中至少有1人未进行Mgen筛查。我们建议采取多管齐下的方法,包括严格遵守检测标准、局部耐药检测、耐药性指导管理以及提高治愈率检测的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mycoplasma genitalium treatment strategies in the era of significant macrolide resistance: Findings from a multi-centre audit in Northwest England.

IntroductionAzithromycin is first-line for uncomplicated Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) treatment in UK and European guidelines, however the rates of azithromycin resistance have increased significantly in recent years leading to higher rates of treatment failure. This study aims to review the disease epidemiology to guide service improvement.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective case note review of 1036 persons treated for Mgen over 1067 Mgen-related attendances. We obtained data on demographics, site(s) of infection, antibiotic resistance, treatment regimen received and results of test of cure.Results71.1% (n = 759) patients received the recommended first-line regimen of doxycycline and azithromycin. Moxifloxacin is the recommended first-line management for macrolide-resistant or complicated infection. 15% (n = 155) patients received moxifloxacin alone as first-line treatment, and 6.9% (n = 72) patients received doxycycline and moxifloxacin dual therapy. 72.9% (n = 753) samples were successfully tested for macrolide resistance. Of these, 55.5% (n = 418) showed macrolide resistance. 20.6% (n = 7) showed fluoroquinolone resistance.ConclusionsResistance data show a macrolide resistance rate of 55.5% across our region, and at least 1 in 10 persons were inappropriately screened for Mgen. We propose a multi-pronged approach which includes strict adherence to testing criteria, local resistance testing, resistance-guided management as well as innovative approaches to improve test of cure rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信