垂体腺瘤患者的内窥镜与显微经蝶窦手术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Chengkai Zhang, Shunchang Ma, Dan Xiao, Luwen Zhang, Songbai Gui, Pinan Liu, Jingyao Geng, Huizhen Yang, Xuyang Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Xiudong Guan, Dainan Zhang, Liwei Zhang, Deling Li, Wang Jia
{"title":"垂体腺瘤患者的内窥镜与显微经蝶窦手术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Chengkai Zhang, Shunchang Ma, Dan Xiao, Luwen Zhang, Songbai Gui, Pinan Liu, Jingyao Geng, Huizhen Yang, Xuyang Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Xiudong Guan, Dainan Zhang, Liwei Zhang, Deling Li, Wang Jia","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The comparative efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) remains controversial. Previous retrospective studies have often been limited by inconsistencies in baseline characteristics of patients, which may affect the validity of the comparisons. This study aimed to evaluate the trend in the proportion of transsphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic surgeries in China and compare outcomes in comparable patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The National Brain Tumor Registry of China (NBTRC) database was queried to extract PA patients (2011-2021) for trend analysis. Stratified sampling was performed, and a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the patients' baseline characteristics. Postoperative outcomes, complications, and prognosis were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the nationwide 17 012 PA patients, there was a gradual increase in the proportion of endoscopic surgeries (annual percent change, 11.89%). Among the 1863 stratified patients, those who underwent endoscopic surgery had a higher preoperative recurrence rate and higher Knosp and Hardy grades (P < 0.05). Endoscopic surgery showed a similar gross total resection (GTR) rate to microscopy (55.6% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.886) in the real-world cohort and a higher GTR rate (59.5% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.037) in the PSM cohort. After PSM, there was no significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid leak and secondary surgery (P > 0.05); endoscopic surgery showed more bleeding, longer surgical time, shorter hospital stay, and higher costs (all P < 0.001) compared to microscopic surgery. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between endoscopic and microscopic surgeries for comparable PA patients (P = 0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is increasingly adopted in China, demonstrating a higher GTR rate than microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in PA patients with similar characteristics, without increasing severe complication rates. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between the two techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas: a propensity score matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Chengkai Zhang, Shunchang Ma, Dan Xiao, Luwen Zhang, Songbai Gui, Pinan Liu, Jingyao Geng, Huizhen Yang, Xuyang Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Xiudong Guan, Dainan Zhang, Liwei Zhang, Deling Li, Wang Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The comparative efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) remains controversial. Previous retrospective studies have often been limited by inconsistencies in baseline characteristics of patients, which may affect the validity of the comparisons. This study aimed to evaluate the trend in the proportion of transsphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic surgeries in China and compare outcomes in comparable patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The National Brain Tumor Registry of China (NBTRC) database was queried to extract PA patients (2011-2021) for trend analysis. Stratified sampling was performed, and a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the patients' baseline characteristics. Postoperative outcomes, complications, and prognosis were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the nationwide 17 012 PA patients, there was a gradual increase in the proportion of endoscopic surgeries (annual percent change, 11.89%). Among the 1863 stratified patients, those who underwent endoscopic surgery had a higher preoperative recurrence rate and higher Knosp and Hardy grades (P < 0.05). Endoscopic surgery showed a similar gross total resection (GTR) rate to microscopy (55.6% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.886) in the real-world cohort and a higher GTR rate (59.5% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.037) in the PSM cohort. After PSM, there was no significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid leak and secondary surgery (P > 0.05); endoscopic surgery showed more bleeding, longer surgical time, shorter hospital stay, and higher costs (all P < 0.001) compared to microscopic surgery. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between endoscopic and microscopic surgeries for comparable PA patients (P = 0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is increasingly adopted in China, demonstrating a higher GTR rate than microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in PA patients with similar characteristics, without increasing severe complication rates. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between the two techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002889\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:垂体腺瘤(PA)患者的内镜与显微镜下经蝶窦手术的比较疗效仍然存在争议。以往的回顾性研究常常受到患者基线特征不一致的限制,这可能会影响比较的有效性。本研究旨在评估中国经蝶窦内窥镜和显微手术比例的趋势,并比较可比患者的结果。材料和方法:查询中国国家脑肿瘤登记处(NBTRC)数据库,提取PA患者(2011-2021)进行趋势分析。进行分层抽样,采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡患者的基线特征。比较术后结局、并发症及预后。结果:在全国17 012例PA患者中,内镜手术比例逐渐上升(年变化百分比为11.89%)。在1863例分层患者中,内镜手术患者术前复发率较高,Knosp和Hardy评分较高(P < 0.05)。内镜手术显示,在真实世界队列中,GTR率与显微镜相似(55.6%对54.9%,P = 0.886),而在PSM队列中,GTR率更高(59.5%对54.3%,P = 0.037)。PSM术后脑脊液漏及二次手术发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05);内窥镜手术出血较多,手术时间较长,住院时间较短,费用较高(P < 0.001)。在可比较的PA患者中,内镜手术和显微镜手术的术后进展风险相似(P = 0.45)。结论:内镜下经蝶窦手术在中国越来越多的被采用,在相似特征的PA患者中,GTR率高于镜下经蝶窦手术,且未增加严重并发症的发生率。两种技术的术后进展风险相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas: a propensity score matched study.

Background: The comparative efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) remains controversial. Previous retrospective studies have often been limited by inconsistencies in baseline characteristics of patients, which may affect the validity of the comparisons. This study aimed to evaluate the trend in the proportion of transsphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic surgeries in China and compare outcomes in comparable patients.

Materials and methods: The National Brain Tumor Registry of China (NBTRC) database was queried to extract PA patients (2011-2021) for trend analysis. Stratified sampling was performed, and a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the patients' baseline characteristics. Postoperative outcomes, complications, and prognosis were compared.

Results: Among the nationwide 17 012 PA patients, there was a gradual increase in the proportion of endoscopic surgeries (annual percent change, 11.89%). Among the 1863 stratified patients, those who underwent endoscopic surgery had a higher preoperative recurrence rate and higher Knosp and Hardy grades (P < 0.05). Endoscopic surgery showed a similar gross total resection (GTR) rate to microscopy (55.6% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.886) in the real-world cohort and a higher GTR rate (59.5% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.037) in the PSM cohort. After PSM, there was no significant difference in cerebrospinal fluid leak and secondary surgery (P > 0.05); endoscopic surgery showed more bleeding, longer surgical time, shorter hospital stay, and higher costs (all P < 0.001) compared to microscopic surgery. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between endoscopic and microscopic surgeries for comparable PA patients (P = 0.45).

Conclusion: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is increasingly adopted in China, demonstrating a higher GTR rate than microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in PA patients with similar characteristics, without increasing severe complication rates. The risk of postoperative progression was similar between the two techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信