埃博拉病毒病死亡率的临床和职业预测因素:刚果民主共和国评论(2018-2020)。

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jean Paul Muambangu Milambo, Charles Bitamazire Businge
{"title":"埃博拉病毒病死亡率的临床和职业预测因素:刚果民主共和国评论(2018-2020)。","authors":"Jean Paul Muambangu Milambo, Charles Bitamazire Businge","doi":"10.3390/idr17030071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This commentary analyzes demographic, clinical, and occupational characteristics associated with Ebola virus disease (EVD) outcomes during the 2018-2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). <b>Methods:</b> A total of 3477 EVD cases were included. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and patient characteristics. Comorbidity estimates and healthcare worker (HCW) occupational exposure data were incorporated based on the literature. <b>Results:</b> The median age was 26.5 years (SD = 16.1), with the majority (59.7%) aged 20-59. Males represented 51.3% of the cohort. Most patients (81.8%) worked in occupations that were not disease-exposing. Overall, 450 patients (12.9%) died. Although comorbidities initially appeared predictive of mortality (unadjusted HR: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.41-3.87), their effect was not statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.87-1.59; <i>p</i> = 0.301). The strongest predictor of death was clinical status at admission: patients classified as \"very sick\" had an alarmingly high adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 236.26 (95% CI: 33.18-1682.21; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Non-disease-exposing occupations were also associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.33-2.31; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite improvements in outbreak response, mortality remains disproportionately high among patients presenting in critical condition and those outside the health sector. These findings underscore the importance of early detection strategies and enhanced protection for all occupational groups during EVD outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Occupational Predictors of Mortality in Ebola Virus Disease: A Commentary from the Democratic Republic of Congo (2018-2020).\",\"authors\":\"Jean Paul Muambangu Milambo, Charles Bitamazire Businge\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/idr17030071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This commentary analyzes demographic, clinical, and occupational characteristics associated with Ebola virus disease (EVD) outcomes during the 2018-2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). <b>Methods:</b> A total of 3477 EVD cases were included. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and patient characteristics. Comorbidity estimates and healthcare worker (HCW) occupational exposure data were incorporated based on the literature. <b>Results:</b> The median age was 26.5 years (SD = 16.1), with the majority (59.7%) aged 20-59. Males represented 51.3% of the cohort. Most patients (81.8%) worked in occupations that were not disease-exposing. Overall, 450 patients (12.9%) died. Although comorbidities initially appeared predictive of mortality (unadjusted HR: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.41-3.87), their effect was not statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.87-1.59; <i>p</i> = 0.301). The strongest predictor of death was clinical status at admission: patients classified as \\\"very sick\\\" had an alarmingly high adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 236.26 (95% CI: 33.18-1682.21; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Non-disease-exposing occupations were also associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.33-2.31; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite improvements in outbreak response, mortality remains disproportionately high among patients presenting in critical condition and those outside the health sector. These findings underscore the importance of early detection strategies and enhanced protection for all occupational groups during EVD outbreaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本评论分析了2018-2020年刚果民主共和国(DRC)暴发期间与埃博拉病毒病(EVD)结果相关的人口学、临床和职业特征。方法:收集3477例EVD病例。采用描述性统计和单因素及多因素Cox回归分析来评估临床结果与患者特征之间的关系。根据文献,合并合并症估计和卫生保健工作者(HCW)职业暴露数据。结果:中位年龄26.5岁(SD = 16.1),以20 ~ 59岁居多(59.7%)。男性占队列的51.3%。大多数患者(81.8%)从事不接触疾病的职业。总体而言,450名患者(12.9%)死亡。虽然合并症最初似乎可以预测死亡率(未经调整的风险比:3.05;95% CI: 2.41-3.87),调整后效果无统计学意义(调整后HR: 1.17;95% ci: 0.87-1.59;P = 0.301)。死亡的最强预测因子是入院时的临床状态:被归类为“病情严重”的患者具有高得惊人的校正危险比(HR),为236.26 (95% CI: 33.18-1682.21;P < 0.001)。非疾病暴露职业也与死亡率增加相关(调整HR: 1.75;95% ci: 1.33-2.31;P < 0.001)。结论:尽管疫情应对有所改善,但危重患者和非卫生部门患者的死亡率仍然高得不成比例。这些发现强调了在埃博拉病毒病暴发期间早期发现战略和加强对所有职业群体的保护的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Occupational Predictors of Mortality in Ebola Virus Disease: A Commentary from the Democratic Republic of Congo (2018-2020).

Background: This commentary analyzes demographic, clinical, and occupational characteristics associated with Ebola virus disease (EVD) outcomes during the 2018-2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Methods: A total of 3477 EVD cases were included. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and patient characteristics. Comorbidity estimates and healthcare worker (HCW) occupational exposure data were incorporated based on the literature. Results: The median age was 26.5 years (SD = 16.1), with the majority (59.7%) aged 20-59. Males represented 51.3% of the cohort. Most patients (81.8%) worked in occupations that were not disease-exposing. Overall, 450 patients (12.9%) died. Although comorbidities initially appeared predictive of mortality (unadjusted HR: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.41-3.87), their effect was not statistically significant after adjustment (adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.87-1.59; p = 0.301). The strongest predictor of death was clinical status at admission: patients classified as "very sick" had an alarmingly high adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 236.26 (95% CI: 33.18-1682.21; p < 0.001). Non-disease-exposing occupations were also associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.33-2.31; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite improvements in outbreak response, mortality remains disproportionately high among patients presenting in critical condition and those outside the health sector. These findings underscore the importance of early detection strategies and enhanced protection for all occupational groups during EVD outbreaks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信