痴呆患者躁动检测技术的实施结果:系统综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nicolas Farina, Lorna Smith, Melissa Rajalingam, Sube Banerjee
{"title":"痴呆患者躁动检测技术的实施结果:系统综述。","authors":"Nicolas Farina, Lorna Smith, Melissa Rajalingam, Sube Banerjee","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10030070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Experiencing agitation can be particularly distressing for people with dementia and their caregivers. Using technologies to detect agitation can help monitor and intervene when agitation occurs, potentially reducing overall care and support needs. This systematic review aims to explore the implementation outcomes related to the use of agitation detection technologies in people with dementia. By adopting a taxonomy of implementation outcomes, this review seeks to provide insights valuable for the real-world adoption of such technologies for people with dementia. <b>Methods:</b> Searches were conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, PubMed, PsychINFO, IEEEXplore, and CINAHL Plus. Included studies were required to have implemented, evaluated, or validated technology with the intention to detect agitation in people with dementia in real-time. <b>Results:</b> On 14 May 2024, 1697 records were identified, and 19 were included in the review. The median sample size was 10, and around two-thirds of the records (n = 12, 63%) used 'multimodal' technologies for detecting agitation. Over half of the records (n = 10, 53%) were reporting from two studies. Across technologies, there was evidence of acceptability and feasibility, though there was a general absence of primary data related to implementation outcomes. There were, however, a number of technical issues and limitations that affected the fidelity and appropriateness of the technology, albeit not unique to people with dementia. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a need for more empirical data on this topic to maximise uptake and adoption. Future research needs to ensure that the voice of the person with dementia is integrated within the evaluation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Outcomes for Agitation Detection Technologies in People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Farina, Lorna Smith, Melissa Rajalingam, Sube Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/geriatrics10030070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Experiencing agitation can be particularly distressing for people with dementia and their caregivers. Using technologies to detect agitation can help monitor and intervene when agitation occurs, potentially reducing overall care and support needs. This systematic review aims to explore the implementation outcomes related to the use of agitation detection technologies in people with dementia. By adopting a taxonomy of implementation outcomes, this review seeks to provide insights valuable for the real-world adoption of such technologies for people with dementia. <b>Methods:</b> Searches were conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, PubMed, PsychINFO, IEEEXplore, and CINAHL Plus. Included studies were required to have implemented, evaluated, or validated technology with the intention to detect agitation in people with dementia in real-time. <b>Results:</b> On 14 May 2024, 1697 records were identified, and 19 were included in the review. The median sample size was 10, and around two-thirds of the records (n = 12, 63%) used 'multimodal' technologies for detecting agitation. Over half of the records (n = 10, 53%) were reporting from two studies. Across technologies, there was evidence of acceptability and feasibility, though there was a general absence of primary data related to implementation outcomes. There were, however, a number of technical issues and limitations that affected the fidelity and appropriateness of the technology, albeit not unique to people with dementia. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a need for more empirical data on this topic to maximise uptake and adoption. Future research needs to ensure that the voice of the person with dementia is integrated within the evaluation process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10030070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10030070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经历躁动对痴呆症患者及其照顾者来说尤其令人痛苦。使用检测躁动的技术有助于在躁动发生时进行监测和干预,从而潜在地减少总体护理和支持需求。本系统综述旨在探讨与痴呆患者使用躁动检测技术相关的实施结果。通过采用实施结果分类,本综述旨在为痴呆症患者在现实世界中采用此类技术提供有价值的见解。方法:在SCOPUS、PubMed、PsychINFO、IEEEXplore、CINAHL Plus等数据库中进行检索。纳入的研究需要实施、评估或验证旨在实时检测痴呆患者躁动的技术。结果:2024年5月14日,共鉴定出1697份记录,其中19份纳入综述。中位数样本量为10,大约三分之二的记录(n = 12,63%)使用“多模式”技术检测躁动。超过一半的记录(n = 10,53 %)来自两项研究。所有技术都有可接受性和可行性的证据,尽管普遍缺乏与实施结果相关的原始数据。然而,有一些技术问题和限制影响了该技术的保真度和适当性,尽管不是痴呆症患者独有的。结论:需要更多关于这一主题的经验数据,以最大限度地吸收和采用。未来的研究需要确保将痴呆症患者的声音纳入评估过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation Outcomes for Agitation Detection Technologies in People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Background: Experiencing agitation can be particularly distressing for people with dementia and their caregivers. Using technologies to detect agitation can help monitor and intervene when agitation occurs, potentially reducing overall care and support needs. This systematic review aims to explore the implementation outcomes related to the use of agitation detection technologies in people with dementia. By adopting a taxonomy of implementation outcomes, this review seeks to provide insights valuable for the real-world adoption of such technologies for people with dementia. Methods: Searches were conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, PubMed, PsychINFO, IEEEXplore, and CINAHL Plus. Included studies were required to have implemented, evaluated, or validated technology with the intention to detect agitation in people with dementia in real-time. Results: On 14 May 2024, 1697 records were identified, and 19 were included in the review. The median sample size was 10, and around two-thirds of the records (n = 12, 63%) used 'multimodal' technologies for detecting agitation. Over half of the records (n = 10, 53%) were reporting from two studies. Across technologies, there was evidence of acceptability and feasibility, though there was a general absence of primary data related to implementation outcomes. There were, however, a number of technical issues and limitations that affected the fidelity and appropriateness of the technology, albeit not unique to people with dementia. Conclusions: There is a need for more empirical data on this topic to maximise uptake and adoption. Future research needs to ensure that the voice of the person with dementia is integrated within the evaluation process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信